Friday, April 27, 2012
Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me? (And Other Concerns) by Mindy Kaling
★★★½
For most of the book, I thought I would end up rating it 3 stars for sure. Mindy Kaling is frequently self-congratulatory, and even though you know she's doing it to be funny, sometimes I had to remind myself of that perspective. She mentions several times that teenage girls are something of a target audience for the book - and I do agree, I think I'd like to give this book to Isabelle maybe when she's in high school, though all the pop cultural references will be outdated by then - but for a book that was expected to be in the hand of teenage girls, I wasn't crazy about the use of profanity.
Mindy Kaling is definitely funny, and I was certainly entertained by the book, chuckling at times. The more I got to know her through her writing, the more I liked her. I love the way her relationship with her mom is portrayed, and it is so clear that she respects her parents immensely. Despite her emotional and dramatic tendencies (as she describes herself), she seems to be remarkably down-to-earth with good morals and healthy perspectives on friendships, family, and romances. I like that she is a loyal and devoted friend, which is made especially clear in the chapter titled "Best Friend Rights and Responsibilities". And I think it's great that she shared some her most embarrassing and humiliating experiences - it really makes the reader (perhaps a teenage girl!) feel like it's okay to be embarrassed and humiliated, that it really does happen to everybody, and you'll get over it.
I'm always especially pleased when a book takes place in the Boston area, and since Mindy Kaling grew up around here, it was fun to read about her experiences at places I know. Also, I was SO thrilled to see that photos were interspersed throughout the book. I've always found it kind of annoying when memoirs have photos grouped together in the middle of the book, so I have to constantly flip back and forth between the text and the photos to get the full contextual meaning of the pictures.
I definitely finished the book thinking I might rate it 4 stars, which is why I averaged it out to 3 1/2 stars. She mentions at the end of her book that maybe she'd write another about married life and having kids, once she is married and has kids. If she ever does write that book, I'd definitely read it!
Monday, April 23, 2012
Catching Fire (The Hunger Game #2) by Suzanne Collins
★★★½
*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***
First, the negatives. As the book opened, I really thought the first-person narrative voice of Katniss sounded forced, somehow not as natural as in the first book. The writing improved as the book progressed, but it was a bit of a hurdle to get over.
I never liked the idea of this kind of violence being in young adult novels, and I actually found Catching Fire a lot more violent than The Hunger Games, what with all the descriptions of Katniss's nightmares, the violence of past Games, and the violence of the current Games.
Finally, after Peeta's character was built up a bit in District 12, it was disappointing to see that once the Games began, he was again relegated to being little more than dead weight. It would've been nice to see him be more useful in the arena this time.
Anyway, despite the above, there were plenty of positives to keep me interested in this trilogy. The first thing that struck me in this book was the way it lends itself to potential discussions about revolutions. What makes people want to rebel? What does it take to spark a rebellion? Why would one district be more willing or able to stage an uprising than another?
I thought the mockingjay as a symbol of hope and rebellion - and the idea of Katniss as the mockingjay personified - was great. I really loved the resurrection of District 13, though Ken tells me that kind of thing is a very common plot device in sci-fi fiction. (But I didn't know! So it's new to me.)
In some ways, this book redeemed the trilogy in terms of complaints I had about the first book. The significance of the mockingjay pin is made more clear, and I liked that some of Katniss's inner psychological struggle of having to kill other tributes finally surfaced in these Games.
The ending was unsatisfying, but I think that can be forgiven because it's a trilogy. I'll just have to read the final installment and hope that its ending doesn't disappoint.
*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***
First, the negatives. As the book opened, I really thought the first-person narrative voice of Katniss sounded forced, somehow not as natural as in the first book. The writing improved as the book progressed, but it was a bit of a hurdle to get over.
I never liked the idea of this kind of violence being in young adult novels, and I actually found Catching Fire a lot more violent than The Hunger Games, what with all the descriptions of Katniss's nightmares, the violence of past Games, and the violence of the current Games.
Finally, after Peeta's character was built up a bit in District 12, it was disappointing to see that once the Games began, he was again relegated to being little more than dead weight. It would've been nice to see him be more useful in the arena this time.
Anyway, despite the above, there were plenty of positives to keep me interested in this trilogy. The first thing that struck me in this book was the way it lends itself to potential discussions about revolutions. What makes people want to rebel? What does it take to spark a rebellion? Why would one district be more willing or able to stage an uprising than another?
I thought the mockingjay as a symbol of hope and rebellion - and the idea of Katniss as the mockingjay personified - was great. I really loved the resurrection of District 13, though Ken tells me that kind of thing is a very common plot device in sci-fi fiction. (But I didn't know! So it's new to me.)
In some ways, this book redeemed the trilogy in terms of complaints I had about the first book. The significance of the mockingjay pin is made more clear, and I liked that some of Katniss's inner psychological struggle of having to kill other tributes finally surfaced in these Games.
The ending was unsatisfying, but I think that can be forgiven because it's a trilogy. I'll just have to read the final installment and hope that its ending doesn't disappoint.
Labels:
book,
book: 3-and-a-half stars,
series,
young adult
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)
★★★★
*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***
Wow, am I really giving this movie 4 stars?! I totally got sucked in way more than I thought I would. Little Caesar was so cute, so human, that I couldn't help but root for him - even though I knew that his rise would mean the fall of the entire human race!
Caesar's sense of "humanity" was moving - and by "humanity" I mean his kindred connection with his fellow primates, and his respect for human life.
I know it's sci-fi, but I actually got a little worried, wondering how the U.S. National Guard might take down a powerful mob of intelligent primates. I expected the human race to fall at the hands of the primates, so the way it actually unfolded at the very end was an interesting twist. If a super virus really was on the loose - well, okay, I'd have to assume that in real life, Franklin would have been quarantined immediately after having been exposed to the gas, so it wouldn't actually have had a chance to spread. Alright, alright, I know, it's just a movie - I just can't believe how much it sucked me in!
*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***
Wow, am I really giving this movie 4 stars?! I totally got sucked in way more than I thought I would. Little Caesar was so cute, so human, that I couldn't help but root for him - even though I knew that his rise would mean the fall of the entire human race!
Caesar's sense of "humanity" was moving - and by "humanity" I mean his kindred connection with his fellow primates, and his respect for human life.
I know it's sci-fi, but I actually got a little worried, wondering how the U.S. National Guard might take down a powerful mob of intelligent primates. I expected the human race to fall at the hands of the primates, so the way it actually unfolded at the very end was an interesting twist. If a super virus really was on the loose - well, okay, I'd have to assume that in real life, Franklin would have been quarantined immediately after having been exposed to the gas, so it wouldn't actually have had a chance to spread. Alright, alright, I know, it's just a movie - I just can't believe how much it sucked me in!
Friday, April 20, 2012
The Hunger Games (2012)
★★★½
A rare case in which I enjoyed the movie more than the book. I wasn't entirely comfortable with the premise of the book, but it does seem to work better as a movie. I don't know, maybe I hold books to a higher standard than movies.
I might even have given this movie 4 stars if they hadn't left out my absolute favorite scene from the book - District 11's gesture towards Katniss, and Katniss's response.
I actually really enjoyed the way the Capitol was over-stylized, and I liked the Gamemasters' control room (which was not at all in the book). I thought the movie improved on the book in a number of ways, including the way the mockingjay pin was incorporated into the story (its significance was questionable in the book), the introduction of the primary Gamemaster character, and the toning down of the book's crazy sci-fi wolves. Also, Katniss and Peeta's relationship just unfolded much more naturally and less frustratingly in the movie than it did in the book. I liked the casting. I didn't like the frequent use of the shaky camera trick.
A rare case in which I enjoyed the movie more than the book. I wasn't entirely comfortable with the premise of the book, but it does seem to work better as a movie. I don't know, maybe I hold books to a higher standard than movies.
I might even have given this movie 4 stars if they hadn't left out my absolute favorite scene from the book - District 11's gesture towards Katniss, and Katniss's response.
I actually really enjoyed the way the Capitol was over-stylized, and I liked the Gamemasters' control room (which was not at all in the book). I thought the movie improved on the book in a number of ways, including the way the mockingjay pin was incorporated into the story (its significance was questionable in the book), the introduction of the primary Gamemaster character, and the toning down of the book's crazy sci-fi wolves. Also, Katniss and Peeta's relationship just unfolded much more naturally and less frustratingly in the movie than it did in the book. I liked the casting. I didn't like the frequent use of the shaky camera trick.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
★★★
Yeah, I don't know. I read this book back in middle school, I think, maybe early high school, and I do remember thinking it was funny. I remember my cousin being enthusiastic when I told him I was reading it, and him saying he laughed out loud at parts. I've just re-read it for the first time, and I did chuckle to myself a few times. There were certainly a handful of one-liners that I thought were especially clever, but I wasn't rolling on the floor laughing like I thought I would be. Mostly this book is just plain silly. A light and fun read, though I have to admit, considering how light and fun it is, I'm surprised at how long it took me to finish it.
Yeah, I don't know. I read this book back in middle school, I think, maybe early high school, and I do remember thinking it was funny. I remember my cousin being enthusiastic when I told him I was reading it, and him saying he laughed out loud at parts. I've just re-read it for the first time, and I did chuckle to myself a few times. There were certainly a handful of one-liners that I thought were especially clever, but I wasn't rolling on the floor laughing like I thought I would be. Mostly this book is just plain silly. A light and fun read, though I have to admit, considering how light and fun it is, I'm surprised at how long it took me to finish it.
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Rethinking Tikki Tikki Tembo
As a child, did you love Tikki Tikki Tembo by Arlene Mosel? Did you find the absurdly long name "Tikki Tikki Tembo-no Sa Rembo-chari Bari Ruchi-pip Peri Pembo" intoxicatingly fun to chant or sing? First published in 1968, the book has won some honors:
When I overheard my half-Chinese/half-Caucasian 6-year-old daughter singing the name a couple months ago, I had to ask her where she learned it. "In music class, at school," she replied. And to tell you the truth, I felt uneasy.
My first encounter with Tikki Tikki Tembo occurred around middle school. A Chinese-American friend was talking about the way other kids chanted "Tikki Tikki Tembo" around her. I had never heard those words before, so I asked her, "What does that mean?" The quiet seriousness of her response struck me. She looked me in the eye and said, "It's racist."
This is how the story is summarized on Amazon.com:
"In this beautiful edition--complete with line and wash illustrations by artist Blair Lent--Arlene Mosel retells an old Chinese folktale about how the people of China came to give their children short names after traditionally giving their "first and honored" sons grand, long names. Tikki tikki tembo (which means "the most wonderful thing in the whole wide world") and his brother Chang (which means "little or nothing") get into trouble with a well, are saved by the Old Man with the Ladder, and change history while they're at it." (http://www.amazon.com/Tikki-Tembo-Arlene-Mosel/dp/0312367481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1332508100&sr=8-1)
The Multiculturalist, a publication by Northern Illinois University, warns that, contrary to common misconception, not all children's books about other cultures are authentic.(http://www.niu.edu/mct/newsletter/2009-2010/vol3_num1.pdf) On page 4, the article states:
"Teachers who want to share other cultures may unintentionally choose books that are racist or not representative of a particular group... A book that is often recommended (see Huck, Hepler, & Hickman, 1987) is Tikki Tikki Tembo (Mosel, 1968)... The text and illustrations, however, are inaccurate depictions of any Chinese... The message about Chinese names is less than flattering."
I do think the use of the word "unintentional" is important. I hold my daughter's school system in very high regard, and from the beginning, I had to assume that the teachers and administration - not a single person of color among them! - simply did not know about the racist perceptions of this popular tale. I mulled over the idea of calling up the school principal and just letting him know that the story isn't exactly culturally sensitive. But I admit, part of me thought, "Maybe another Asian parent will do it." It wasn't until I found out that the entire school would be acting out the story and performing the song "Tikki Tikki Tembo" at a school meeting that I finally realized, "No one else is going to speak up."
So, in a phone call with the principal, I explained why the story is racist.
When I read online forums and discussions about the potentially offensive nature of Tikki Tikki Tembo, I am disappointed because so frequently the responses are dismissive. People say, "Oh, lighten up, it's just a fun story for kids." There is, of course, a difference between INTENT and IMPACT. I feel pretty confident in surmising that the author and illustrator of Tikki Tikki Tembo did not set out to offend anyone. In fact, the INTENT may even have been to honor the Chinese culture by sharing a charming story of their understanding of China. But the IMPACT is that an entire culture is misrepresented, and it is not unreasonable that people within the misrepresented culture might feel offended. It's understandable that some people may have happy and fond childhood memories of this book, but their positive experiences with this book does not make other people's negative experiences any less valid.
Another common argument in defense of Tikki Tikki Tembo is, "Children know the difference between truth and fiction. They know this is not a real story of actual Chinese culture." Perhaps some do, but what if the book is actually presented by a teacher or librarian as an authentic Chinese folktale describing Chinese culture? Weston Woods, a production arm of Scholastic, a children's book publisher that specifically creates educational materials for schools, provides a lesson plan for use with their Tikki Tikki Tembo video. Two explicit objectives of the lesson are to "learn about Chinese culture" and "enjoy a well-known Chinese folktale." (http://westonwoods.scholastic.com/products/westonwoods/study_guides/tikki_tikki_tembo.pdf) Of course, in reading this particular book - or watching a video based on the book - the class will do neither.
In 1968, when cultural diversity wasn't yet the major issue it is today, any book that featured a foreign culture was probably welcomed, even if only for its novelty factor. But now that it's 2012, and the children's sections of our libraries are filled with authentic books about other cultures, there is no longer any need to rely on inauthentic tales like Tikki Tikki Tembo as an example of Chinese culture. I am a big fan of Grace Lin, who writes children's books of all levels ranging from picture books to chapter books. Her books are set in America, but they feature a Chinese-American family and plenty of Chinese and Taiwanese culture. For a book set in "old China," I recommend Ruby's Wish by Shirin Yim, a book my daughter actually discovered herself in the school library.
So what did my daughter's school principal say and do in response to my concerns? (My on-the-spot explanations were not quite as organized as my post here, but I think I got the ideas across!) I was so pleased and relieved to hear him say, "I had never thought about the book that way before, but now that you explain it to me, of course I understand." He repeatedly stressed his desire to be culturally sensitive, and he suggested a compromise for the school's upcoming performance of Tikki Tikki Tembo. (I knew the school had been practicing the show for months, and it was too late to do anything drastic like cancel the performance or choose a new story and song.) Rather than introduce it as "a Chinese folktale," they would simply call it "a story" and avoid any references to China or Chinese culture. I thought that was a great idea.
Moving forward, seeing how popular Tikki Tikki Tembo is in schools and with parents, I think it's unrealistic to expect everyone to simply remove it from their bookshelves. My hope is that if people do continue to pass on the story of Tikki Tikki Tembo, they do it in a responsible way.
For another person's insights, I recommend this article. It gives what I think is a fair and balanced review of the book, and then it discusses the appropriateness of the book in today's diverse society. It goes even further by suggesting other books about names, and Asian names in particular, that can be used to supplement a reading of Tikki Tikki Tembo.
- In 1968, it won the Boston Globe - Horn Book Award for Picture Books. (http://us.macmillan.com/tikkitikkitembo/ArleneMosel)
- In 1997, the New York Times named it "one of the 50 best books in the last 50 years." (http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6634456.html?desc=topstory)
- In 2007, the book was #53 on the National Education Association's Teachers' Top 100 Books for Children. (http://www.nea.org/grants/13154.htm)
- The Fall 2009 Audio Book version was Parents' Choice Approved by the Parents' Choice Foundation. (http://www.parents-choice.org/product.cfm?product_id=26879&StepNum=1&award=aw)
When I overheard my half-Chinese/half-Caucasian 6-year-old daughter singing the name a couple months ago, I had to ask her where she learned it. "In music class, at school," she replied. And to tell you the truth, I felt uneasy.
My first encounter with Tikki Tikki Tembo occurred around middle school. A Chinese-American friend was talking about the way other kids chanted "Tikki Tikki Tembo" around her. I had never heard those words before, so I asked her, "What does that mean?" The quiet seriousness of her response struck me. She looked me in the eye and said, "It's racist."
This is how the story is summarized on Amazon.com:
"In this beautiful edition--complete with line and wash illustrations by artist Blair Lent--Arlene Mosel retells an old Chinese folktale about how the people of China came to give their children short names after traditionally giving their "first and honored" sons grand, long names. Tikki tikki tembo (which means "the most wonderful thing in the whole wide world") and his brother Chang (which means "little or nothing") get into trouble with a well, are saved by the Old Man with the Ladder, and change history while they're at it." (http://www.amazon.com/Tikki-Tembo-Arlene-Mosel/dp/0312367481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1332508100&sr=8-1)
The Multiculturalist, a publication by Northern Illinois University, warns that, contrary to common misconception, not all children's books about other cultures are authentic.(http://www.niu.edu/mct/newsletter/2009-2010/vol3_num1.pdf) On page 4, the article states:
"Teachers who want to share other cultures may unintentionally choose books that are racist or not representative of a particular group... A book that is often recommended (see Huck, Hepler, & Hickman, 1987) is Tikki Tikki Tembo (Mosel, 1968)... The text and illustrations, however, are inaccurate depictions of any Chinese... The message about Chinese names is less than flattering."
I do think the use of the word "unintentional" is important. I hold my daughter's school system in very high regard, and from the beginning, I had to assume that the teachers and administration - not a single person of color among them! - simply did not know about the racist perceptions of this popular tale. I mulled over the idea of calling up the school principal and just letting him know that the story isn't exactly culturally sensitive. But I admit, part of me thought, "Maybe another Asian parent will do it." It wasn't until I found out that the entire school would be acting out the story and performing the song "Tikki Tikki Tembo" at a school meeting that I finally realized, "No one else is going to speak up."
So, in a phone call with the principal, I explained why the story is racist.
- The book purports to be an "old Chinese folktale," but it is not. It is actually thought to be based on a Japanese folktale called Jugemu. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jugemu) Presumably, that tale was picked up and retold by Westerners, who mistakenly attributed it to China and added to the story. The result is a story that is neither Japanese nor Chinese, and it exemplifies the racist attitude of, "Chinese, Japanese, what's the difference, they're all the same."
- Though the book's illustrations are beautifully drawn by Caldecott Medal-winning artist Blair Lent, they do not authentically depict Chinese people, as noted by The Multiculturalist above. Tikki Tikki Tembo's shoes are actually strikingly similar to traditional Japanese geta footwear, again reinforcing the inaccurate perception that all Asian cultures are the same.
- Tikki Tikki Tembo's full name does not include any actual Chinese words, and it perpetuates the stereotype that Chinese words and names sound like nonsensical syllables. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikki_Tikki_Tembo) If anyone doubts that this stereotype continues to persist in modern society, look no further than the 2011 racist rant by a UCLA student.
- Tikki Tikki Tembo's little brother does have a Chinese name, Chang, which, according to the book, means "little or nothing." The book was written in 1968, well before pinyin was standardized, but even if we generously consider all tones of "chang" and "zhang," none of the dozens of possible translations even come close to meaning "little" or "nothing."
- According to the story, Chinese people traditionally gave their first-born sons long and honorable names. This is not true. I tried to find a source to back up this point, but apparently there isn't really a good way to find evidence of what a culture is not. This Wikipedia article, at least, provides information on Chinese names, modern and historical, and makes no mention of first-born sons ever getting especially long names.
When I read online forums and discussions about the potentially offensive nature of Tikki Tikki Tembo, I am disappointed because so frequently the responses are dismissive. People say, "Oh, lighten up, it's just a fun story for kids." There is, of course, a difference between INTENT and IMPACT. I feel pretty confident in surmising that the author and illustrator of Tikki Tikki Tembo did not set out to offend anyone. In fact, the INTENT may even have been to honor the Chinese culture by sharing a charming story of their understanding of China. But the IMPACT is that an entire culture is misrepresented, and it is not unreasonable that people within the misrepresented culture might feel offended. It's understandable that some people may have happy and fond childhood memories of this book, but their positive experiences with this book does not make other people's negative experiences any less valid.
Another common argument in defense of Tikki Tikki Tembo is, "Children know the difference between truth and fiction. They know this is not a real story of actual Chinese culture." Perhaps some do, but what if the book is actually presented by a teacher or librarian as an authentic Chinese folktale describing Chinese culture? Weston Woods, a production arm of Scholastic, a children's book publisher that specifically creates educational materials for schools, provides a lesson plan for use with their Tikki Tikki Tembo video. Two explicit objectives of the lesson are to "learn about Chinese culture" and "enjoy a well-known Chinese folktale." (http://westonwoods.scholastic.com/products/westonwoods/study_guides/tikki_tikki_tembo.pdf) Of course, in reading this particular book - or watching a video based on the book - the class will do neither.
In 1968, when cultural diversity wasn't yet the major issue it is today, any book that featured a foreign culture was probably welcomed, even if only for its novelty factor. But now that it's 2012, and the children's sections of our libraries are filled with authentic books about other cultures, there is no longer any need to rely on inauthentic tales like Tikki Tikki Tembo as an example of Chinese culture. I am a big fan of Grace Lin, who writes children's books of all levels ranging from picture books to chapter books. Her books are set in America, but they feature a Chinese-American family and plenty of Chinese and Taiwanese culture. For a book set in "old China," I recommend Ruby's Wish by Shirin Yim, a book my daughter actually discovered herself in the school library.
So what did my daughter's school principal say and do in response to my concerns? (My on-the-spot explanations were not quite as organized as my post here, but I think I got the ideas across!) I was so pleased and relieved to hear him say, "I had never thought about the book that way before, but now that you explain it to me, of course I understand." He repeatedly stressed his desire to be culturally sensitive, and he suggested a compromise for the school's upcoming performance of Tikki Tikki Tembo. (I knew the school had been practicing the show for months, and it was too late to do anything drastic like cancel the performance or choose a new story and song.) Rather than introduce it as "a Chinese folktale," they would simply call it "a story" and avoid any references to China or Chinese culture. I thought that was a great idea.
Moving forward, seeing how popular Tikki Tikki Tembo is in schools and with parents, I think it's unrealistic to expect everyone to simply remove it from their bookshelves. My hope is that if people do continue to pass on the story of Tikki Tikki Tembo, they do it in a responsible way.
- One option is to use the story to bring back oral storytelling, and to leave out all references of China and Chinese culture. Without using the actual book at all, parents and teachers can tell the tale of Tikki Tikki Tembo, simply setting it in "a far away land." The younger brother can have a name that does not strongly evoke any particular foreign culture, and it can be comparable to the syllables in Tikki Tikki Tembo's name. Perhaps something like Bip.
- Another option is to use the book as a teaching opportunity. Parents and teachers can enjoy the book and its illustrations, but follow it up with a discussion about how not all books are true stories, and not all pictures are true representations of what they are trying to depict. Inaccuracies in the story and pictures can be explicitly pointed out, and the book can be followed by a reading of another book that does authentically portray Chinese culture.
For another person's insights, I recommend this article. It gives what I think is a fair and balanced review of the book, and then it discusses the appropriateness of the book in today's diverse society. It goes even further by suggesting other books about names, and Asian names in particular, that can be used to supplement a reading of Tikki Tikki Tembo.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games #1) by Suzanne Collins
★★★
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!!! ***
Okay, okay, I have to admit, I went into this book with a bias against it. I already knew the premise, and I just didn't think it was appropriate for middle schoolers to be reading about kids killing kids. (Amazon lists the book as being for ages 12 and up.) Once I started reading, though, I saw right away that the killings weren't actually a real focus of the book, so I lightened up. There are explicit descriptions of killings, but they are brief and infrequent, so I guess I can get over it. But, I still don't like the premise, and I still don't think it's appropriate for middle schoolers. Maybe it's okay for high schoolers.
I do like the idea of parents reading this book along with their kids and having discussions about the bigger themes. When a society is made up of haves and have-nots, how does that affect the attitudes of the people within those populations? What does it say about the range of humanity that in some districts, being chosen as a tribute is feared, but in others, it's an honor? Though the premise of the book involves killings, how does the book actually turn attention to positive human emotions like compassion and loyalty?
The examples of compassion and loyalty were really my favorite parts of the book. I even teared up when District 11 sent a gesture of thanks for Katniss's kindness towards Rue. I really liked Peeta's devotion to Katniss - even though, once they teamed up, Peeta only seemed to weigh Katniss down.
I liked that the book was easy to read; the literary voice of the teenage girl was convincing. As a reader, I got a pretty good understanding of her confusing emotions regarding Gale and Peeta. But, with Katniss narrating, it seemed like there were only a limited number of possible outcomes, and I wonder if a third-person narration would have been more effective. And, after a while, her dense inability to see Peeta's true feelings got kind of annoying.
One thing that really kept bothering me as the book progressed was that even though the author chose to use this controversial premise of kids killing kids, she actually side-stepped all the difficult issues. Once the Hunger Games actually started, it was one cop-out after another: Katniss kills a boy basically in self-defense, after he kills Rue; Peeta accidentally causes the death of Foxface; both Katniss and Peeta "finish off" a dying competitor, presumably putting them out of their misery more than anything else; Cato kills Thresh so they don't have to. Conveniently, neither Katniss nor Peeta ever had to kill anyone in cold blood. Katniss wasn't even ever in a position to face that question head-on. Not that I would necessarily WANT them to be in that position, but for a book based on the premise of kids killing kids, I think it would have been worth exploring the difficult questions of whether or not Katniss or Peeta could have actually brought themselves to kill someone for the sake of killing, or what the psychological aftermath would have been if they did.
Another thing that really threw me off was the arrival of the mutts at the lake. Where did that come from?! The book suddenly had a weird horror element. The idea of the fallen tributes being turned into monsters - rather than their bodies being sent home to their families - was truly horrifying. It seemed even to go beyond the level of inhumanity previously attributed to the Capitol. I just didn't see the point of that twist. Why not use killer wolf-like mutts without the human connection? Is the author setting the groundwork for something in one of the sequels?
One more thing - I was a little annoyed that the significance of the mocking-jay pin was never revealed. Why was Madge SO insistent that Katniss wear it into the arena? I can only hope it's revealed in a sequel.
Given that the book ended on a clear cliff-hanger, I will be putting the next book in the series on my to-read list. I admit, I'm dying to find out what happens between Katniss and Gale.
Overall, despite my misgivings about the premise, it was entertaining, and it was easy reading - like eating popcorn, Ken says - but I think it ultimately fell short of its potential.
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!!! ***
Okay, okay, I have to admit, I went into this book with a bias against it. I already knew the premise, and I just didn't think it was appropriate for middle schoolers to be reading about kids killing kids. (Amazon lists the book as being for ages 12 and up.) Once I started reading, though, I saw right away that the killings weren't actually a real focus of the book, so I lightened up. There are explicit descriptions of killings, but they are brief and infrequent, so I guess I can get over it. But, I still don't like the premise, and I still don't think it's appropriate for middle schoolers. Maybe it's okay for high schoolers.
I do like the idea of parents reading this book along with their kids and having discussions about the bigger themes. When a society is made up of haves and have-nots, how does that affect the attitudes of the people within those populations? What does it say about the range of humanity that in some districts, being chosen as a tribute is feared, but in others, it's an honor? Though the premise of the book involves killings, how does the book actually turn attention to positive human emotions like compassion and loyalty?
The examples of compassion and loyalty were really my favorite parts of the book. I even teared up when District 11 sent a gesture of thanks for Katniss's kindness towards Rue. I really liked Peeta's devotion to Katniss - even though, once they teamed up, Peeta only seemed to weigh Katniss down.
I liked that the book was easy to read; the literary voice of the teenage girl was convincing. As a reader, I got a pretty good understanding of her confusing emotions regarding Gale and Peeta. But, with Katniss narrating, it seemed like there were only a limited number of possible outcomes, and I wonder if a third-person narration would have been more effective. And, after a while, her dense inability to see Peeta's true feelings got kind of annoying.
One thing that really kept bothering me as the book progressed was that even though the author chose to use this controversial premise of kids killing kids, she actually side-stepped all the difficult issues. Once the Hunger Games actually started, it was one cop-out after another: Katniss kills a boy basically in self-defense, after he kills Rue; Peeta accidentally causes the death of Foxface; both Katniss and Peeta "finish off" a dying competitor, presumably putting them out of their misery more than anything else; Cato kills Thresh so they don't have to. Conveniently, neither Katniss nor Peeta ever had to kill anyone in cold blood. Katniss wasn't even ever in a position to face that question head-on. Not that I would necessarily WANT them to be in that position, but for a book based on the premise of kids killing kids, I think it would have been worth exploring the difficult questions of whether or not Katniss or Peeta could have actually brought themselves to kill someone for the sake of killing, or what the psychological aftermath would have been if they did.
Another thing that really threw me off was the arrival of the mutts at the lake. Where did that come from?! The book suddenly had a weird horror element. The idea of the fallen tributes being turned into monsters - rather than their bodies being sent home to their families - was truly horrifying. It seemed even to go beyond the level of inhumanity previously attributed to the Capitol. I just didn't see the point of that twist. Why not use killer wolf-like mutts without the human connection? Is the author setting the groundwork for something in one of the sequels?
One more thing - I was a little annoyed that the significance of the mocking-jay pin was never revealed. Why was Madge SO insistent that Katniss wear it into the arena? I can only hope it's revealed in a sequel.
Given that the book ended on a clear cliff-hanger, I will be putting the next book in the series on my to-read list. I admit, I'm dying to find out what happens between Katniss and Gale.
Overall, despite my misgivings about the premise, it was entertaining, and it was easy reading - like eating popcorn, Ken says - but I think it ultimately fell short of its potential.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)