★★
I can appreciate that this movie was a grand, large-scale project, but simply put, I just couldn't get past the yellowface. I know there was a theme of souls transcending race and gender, but this excerpt from the linked article sums it up for me:
In one plotline concerning black slaves, each slave was played by a black actor.
"You have to ask yourself: Would the directors have used blackface on a white actor to play Gyasi’s role?” asked Aoki [founding president of Media Action Network for Asian Americans], referring to David Gyasi, the freed slave in the film. I don’t think so: That would have outraged African American viewers. But badly done yellowface is still OK."
And yes, the yellowface was badly done. When I saw the first yellowfaced actor on screen, I expressed my indignation. In response, Ken assured me that the man was not meant to be Asian; surely he was some kind of conglomerate alien race / human / machine hybrid. Uh, actually, it turned out he was meant to be Korean.
Anyway, I liked the idea of a single soul being reincarnated through time and space, but my eyes weren't keen enough to spot the fleeting birthmark in each of the story lines. After the movie, I had to resort to an Internet search to find out who had the birthmark.
Also, I honestly just kept getting confused. We watched the movie after the kids went to bed, not knowing how long it was, and it went on well past midnight. Maybe I just wasn't fully awake enough to follow the many angles being presented. This first viewing, though, didn't pique my interest enough to encourage a second viewing.
Monday, December 30, 2013
Much Ado About Anne (The Mother-Daughter Book Club #2) by Heather Vogel Frederick
★★★★½
Well, I guess it's pretty meaningful that even though I'm a slow reader, I read this book in just two days.
Once again, Isabelle loved this book and said she would give it 6 stars if possible. I definitely enjoyed this book a lot more than the first.
I liked that the Chadwicks all became more complex characters, and I loved the development of Stewart in particular.
I liked that the book revealed the different perspectives of each of the four girls. So much of one's middle school years are spent comparing your life with others', and I think this book does a really great job of showing that it's only human nature to compare, but at the same time, we should appreciate what we have, and it usually doesn't do any good to make comparisons. For example, Jess can't stand her little brothers, but Megan is an only child and thinks Jess's little brothers are cute. Emma likes having an older brother, but sometimes she wishes she can have an older sister like Cassidy's.
I love that this book makes mention of other books. Isabelle was very excited when she found out that the book club book was Anne of Green Gables, which we read together, and that Emma had read the shoe books, some of which we've read, too. This book, like the first book in the series, also does a nice job of including educational tidbits about the author of the book club book - in this case, Lucy Maud Montgomery - as well as bits of local history, this time about Henry David Thoreau and Walden Pond.
Again, all the middle school problems in this book seemed pretty spot on, but I stopped short of giving this book 5 stars because of the way the over-the-top factor ramped up towards the end. I was more forgiving this time, since it came as less of a surprise after the first book. But what I really couldn't forgive was the misspelling of the name of the author of the shoe books! The author is Noel Streatfeild, but this book spelled it Streatfield. I know it's an unusual spelling, but all the more reason why the author and the editor should have made a point to get it right!
Well, I guess it's pretty meaningful that even though I'm a slow reader, I read this book in just two days.
Once again, Isabelle loved this book and said she would give it 6 stars if possible. I definitely enjoyed this book a lot more than the first.
I liked that the Chadwicks all became more complex characters, and I loved the development of Stewart in particular.
I liked that the book revealed the different perspectives of each of the four girls. So much of one's middle school years are spent comparing your life with others', and I think this book does a really great job of showing that it's only human nature to compare, but at the same time, we should appreciate what we have, and it usually doesn't do any good to make comparisons. For example, Jess can't stand her little brothers, but Megan is an only child and thinks Jess's little brothers are cute. Emma likes having an older brother, but sometimes she wishes she can have an older sister like Cassidy's.
I love that this book makes mention of other books. Isabelle was very excited when she found out that the book club book was Anne of Green Gables, which we read together, and that Emma had read the shoe books, some of which we've read, too. This book, like the first book in the series, also does a nice job of including educational tidbits about the author of the book club book - in this case, Lucy Maud Montgomery - as well as bits of local history, this time about Henry David Thoreau and Walden Pond.
Again, all the middle school problems in this book seemed pretty spot on, but I stopped short of giving this book 5 stars because of the way the over-the-top factor ramped up towards the end. I was more forgiving this time, since it came as less of a surprise after the first book. But what I really couldn't forgive was the misspelling of the name of the author of the shoe books! The author is Noel Streatfeild, but this book spelled it Streatfield. I know it's an unusual spelling, but all the more reason why the author and the editor should have made a point to get it right!
Labels:
book,
book: 4-and-a-half stars,
children,
series
Saturday, December 28, 2013
The Prophet of Yonwood (The Books of Ember #3) by Jeanne DuPrau
★★★
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
Coming third in the Ember series, this book surprised me by being a prequel rather than a sequel. Admittedly, I was disappointed once I realized that I would not be reading about Lina and Doon.
The Prophet of Yonwood takes place before the apocalyptic event that necessitated the building of Ember. By the end, I was again disappointed to realize that despite being a prequel, this book was only tangentially related to Ember, and the Builders of Ember were only lightly touched upon. In fact, this book takes place a good 50 years before "the Disaster".
As it turns out, this book is basically the story of a young girl named Nickie who tries to figure out the world around her. It just so happens that the world is under threat of annihilation, but for the most part, life goes on as usual even while people fear imminent war. The reason I'm giving this book 3 stars - which may seem a little high - is because I think the philosophical questions about "good" versus "bad" make good food for thought for young readers. The book does discuss God, but not any particular religion. There is something of a warning against those who claim to know exactly what God wants, and a push to encourage readers to think for themselves. On page 185 of my edition, Grover says to Nickie, "You should think about what's the right thing to do. Not just take someone's word for it." For those who fear that the book may be anti-religious, it may help to know that Nickie doesn't come to any final conclusions about God, but she does come to terms with Him by giving an offering to "her" God, who is "the god who loves everyone and who makes everything marvelous." (Page 256)
Strangely, this book had all sorts of random references - to dust mites, snakes, Siamese twins, etc. It was so bizarre, but I was pleasantly surprised when all the random pieces turned out to be relevant in some way. Except for the doings of Hoyt McCoy, and a small bit of a journal left by Nickie's great-grandfather... There are hints of some kind of supernatural, parallel universe stuff going on, and that it somehow played a part in delaying world war, but it's not at all fleshed out, and really only adds confusion.
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
Coming third in the Ember series, this book surprised me by being a prequel rather than a sequel. Admittedly, I was disappointed once I realized that I would not be reading about Lina and Doon.
The Prophet of Yonwood takes place before the apocalyptic event that necessitated the building of Ember. By the end, I was again disappointed to realize that despite being a prequel, this book was only tangentially related to Ember, and the Builders of Ember were only lightly touched upon. In fact, this book takes place a good 50 years before "the Disaster".
As it turns out, this book is basically the story of a young girl named Nickie who tries to figure out the world around her. It just so happens that the world is under threat of annihilation, but for the most part, life goes on as usual even while people fear imminent war. The reason I'm giving this book 3 stars - which may seem a little high - is because I think the philosophical questions about "good" versus "bad" make good food for thought for young readers. The book does discuss God, but not any particular religion. There is something of a warning against those who claim to know exactly what God wants, and a push to encourage readers to think for themselves. On page 185 of my edition, Grover says to Nickie, "You should think about what's the right thing to do. Not just take someone's word for it." For those who fear that the book may be anti-religious, it may help to know that Nickie doesn't come to any final conclusions about God, but she does come to terms with Him by giving an offering to "her" God, who is "the god who loves everyone and who makes everything marvelous." (Page 256)
Strangely, this book had all sorts of random references - to dust mites, snakes, Siamese twins, etc. It was so bizarre, but I was pleasantly surprised when all the random pieces turned out to be relevant in some way. Except for the doings of Hoyt McCoy, and a small bit of a journal left by Nickie's great-grandfather... There are hints of some kind of supernatural, parallel universe stuff going on, and that it somehow played a part in delaying world war, but it's not at all fleshed out, and really only adds confusion.
Friday, December 27, 2013
Frozen (2013)
★★★★★
*** WARNING: This review contains spoilers!! ***
I think my rating is overly generous because it was just so much fun going to the movies!! I hadn't been to a movie theatre in months, and it was especially nice going with just Isabelle and me.
Excitement aside, I do think this was a good movie. Instead of the usual girl-meets-prince-and-gets-married plot, we have girl-meets-prince-and-falls-in-love-only-to-find-out-later-he's-a-scoundrel! It actually has a very good "Don't rush into relationships!" message.
This movie was also interesting because, besides the prince-turned-scoundrel - the revelation of which only occurred towards the end of the movie - there really was no evil villain. There was one guy who was not exactly nice, but he wasn't an evil mastermind, and was more of a nuisance than anything else. The "badness" that propelled the story stemmed from a princess having been born with ice powers that she didn't know how to control. A really great twist on the usual Disney MO, I thought.
Also, I loved that the "true love" that saved the kingdom was not romantic love, but sisterly love. Plus, even though this movie does have romantic love, Elsa was just fine without it.
And of course, there's also a comic sidekick, and in this case, I really did enjoy Olaf the snowman!
*** WARNING: This review contains spoilers!! ***
I think my rating is overly generous because it was just so much fun going to the movies!! I hadn't been to a movie theatre in months, and it was especially nice going with just Isabelle and me.
Excitement aside, I do think this was a good movie. Instead of the usual girl-meets-prince-and-gets-married plot, we have girl-meets-prince-and-falls-in-love-only-to-find-out-later-he's-a-scoundrel! It actually has a very good "Don't rush into relationships!" message.
This movie was also interesting because, besides the prince-turned-scoundrel - the revelation of which only occurred towards the end of the movie - there really was no evil villain. There was one guy who was not exactly nice, but he wasn't an evil mastermind, and was more of a nuisance than anything else. The "badness" that propelled the story stemmed from a princess having been born with ice powers that she didn't know how to control. A really great twist on the usual Disney MO, I thought.
Also, I loved that the "true love" that saved the kingdom was not romantic love, but sisterly love. Plus, even though this movie does have romantic love, Elsa was just fine without it.
And of course, there's also a comic sidekick, and in this case, I really did enjoy Olaf the snowman!
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
The Mother-Daughter Book Club (The Mother-Daughter Book Club #1) by Heather Vogel Frederick
★★★½
It's hard keeping up with Isabelle's reading! She picked this one up randomly from the local library. She said she would give this book 6 stars if possible! Alas, I am giving it 3 1/2 stars. Reading this book, I was really torn between things I liked and things I didn't like.
The main characters are four sixth grade girls who are in a mother-daughter book club. I think the book tries hard to have enough variety that most readers would find something to identify with in someone. Emma loves to read and belongs to a financially modest family. Megan is a Chinese-American who loves fashion and bucks the model minority stereotype, much to the chagrin of her wealthy MIT-educated parents. (Megan's tiger mom has the added quirk of being super into all-naturalness in a really over the top way that is, unfortunately, not at all a flattering representation of the vegan / eat local / environmental community.) Jess loves animals, is a whiz at math and science, has an organic farmer for a dad, and a soap opera actress for a mom. (What? Yeah.) Cassidy, a transplant from CA, is an athlete with a former supermodel for a mom. (Huh? Yeah.)
As this book got started, I really thought it had so much potential, despite the crazy portraits of the tree-hugger / supermodel / actress moms. Each chapter is written from the first-person perspective of one of the daughters, which I thought was a fun twist for young readers. The narrative sounds natural and flows well. The girls have typical middle school problems, and I can easily see how this book would appeal to late elementary and early middle school girls.
I loved that the book club was reading Little Women. Each chapter started with a relevant quote from the book, and interesting tidbits about the book and Louisa May Alcott popped up here and there. Additionally, the book takes place in Concord, MA (Louisa May Alcott's hometown), and I liked how information about the Revolutionary War was incorporated, too.
Unfortunately, there was also lot I didn't like about this book. Members of the Chadwick family were either sadly unfortunate or one-dimensionally unlikable. A queen bee daughter, an unpleasant my-daughter-can-do-no-wrong mother, a brother characterized only by his lack of athletic talent, and even a father with an ancestry worthy of ridicule. They had no redeeming qualities, no nuanced character development. And even though this mother-daughter pair were the bullies of the book, I didn't like the way the members of the book club - mothers and daughters alike - made fun of the mom for being overweight. Just not the type of behavior I want my daughter thinking is acceptable or funny.
Having knowledge of Little Women isn't necessary to read this book, but it would be helpful as references to the March girls and their experiences are strewn throughout the book. Many young girls in elementary school probably will not have tackled Little Women yet, but reading this book might inspire them to do so. Unfortunately - and I really can't forgive the book for this shortcoming - this book includes three MAJOR spoilers which, honestly, could ruin a person's Little Women reading experience.
The book has an over-the-top fairy-tale ending for just about everyone, and though the cheese factor was high, I can see how the happy ending would appeal to young girls.
It's hard keeping up with Isabelle's reading! She picked this one up randomly from the local library. She said she would give this book 6 stars if possible! Alas, I am giving it 3 1/2 stars. Reading this book, I was really torn between things I liked and things I didn't like.
The main characters are four sixth grade girls who are in a mother-daughter book club. I think the book tries hard to have enough variety that most readers would find something to identify with in someone. Emma loves to read and belongs to a financially modest family. Megan is a Chinese-American who loves fashion and bucks the model minority stereotype, much to the chagrin of her wealthy MIT-educated parents. (Megan's tiger mom has the added quirk of being super into all-naturalness in a really over the top way that is, unfortunately, not at all a flattering representation of the vegan / eat local / environmental community.) Jess loves animals, is a whiz at math and science, has an organic farmer for a dad, and a soap opera actress for a mom. (What? Yeah.) Cassidy, a transplant from CA, is an athlete with a former supermodel for a mom. (Huh? Yeah.)
As this book got started, I really thought it had so much potential, despite the crazy portraits of the tree-hugger / supermodel / actress moms. Each chapter is written from the first-person perspective of one of the daughters, which I thought was a fun twist for young readers. The narrative sounds natural and flows well. The girls have typical middle school problems, and I can easily see how this book would appeal to late elementary and early middle school girls.
I loved that the book club was reading Little Women. Each chapter started with a relevant quote from the book, and interesting tidbits about the book and Louisa May Alcott popped up here and there. Additionally, the book takes place in Concord, MA (Louisa May Alcott's hometown), and I liked how information about the Revolutionary War was incorporated, too.
Unfortunately, there was also lot I didn't like about this book. Members of the Chadwick family were either sadly unfortunate or one-dimensionally unlikable. A queen bee daughter, an unpleasant my-daughter-can-do-no-wrong mother, a brother characterized only by his lack of athletic talent, and even a father with an ancestry worthy of ridicule. They had no redeeming qualities, no nuanced character development. And even though this mother-daughter pair were the bullies of the book, I didn't like the way the members of the book club - mothers and daughters alike - made fun of the mom for being overweight. Just not the type of behavior I want my daughter thinking is acceptable or funny.
Having knowledge of Little Women isn't necessary to read this book, but it would be helpful as references to the March girls and their experiences are strewn throughout the book. Many young girls in elementary school probably will not have tackled Little Women yet, but reading this book might inspire them to do so. Unfortunately - and I really can't forgive the book for this shortcoming - this book includes three MAJOR spoilers which, honestly, could ruin a person's Little Women reading experience.
The book has an over-the-top fairy-tale ending for just about everyone, and though the cheese factor was high, I can see how the happy ending would appeal to young girls.
Labels:
book,
book: 3-and-a-half stars,
children,
series
Saturday, December 14, 2013
The People of Sparks (The Books of Ember #2) by Jeanne DuPrau
★★★★★
I'm surprising myself by giving this book 5 stars. I keep trying to think of reasons to downgrade my rating, but I just can't think of any. Maybe if I had more extensive post-apocalyptic reading under my belt, I would be less impressed by this book, but as it is, I just really liked it.
This book starts with a couple chapters that I really think should have been in the first book. The people of Ember have come out of from underground, and they now need to somehow put together a new life for themselves in this big, open world they have discovered.
Mostly, this book is a discourse on war. There's nothing new in it for me, but considering the target audience, I think this book would be a really valuable read for kids in elementary and middle school. I think the author did a remarkable job crafting the two communities - the people of Ember and the people of Sparks - and exploring the emotions and thought processes of various characters. Young readers will get a glimpse into the dark side of human nature, but hopefully be left with the idea that goodness can prevail despite injustices - it just might involve making hard choices and finding solutions where there seem to be none. The book examines questions of morality versus survival, and charisma versus actual leadership. I especially liked the way the book delves into Doon's uncertain fascination with Tick, and Torren's angry outbursts.
Maddy quickly became one of my favorite characters, and I only wished that her role was bigger.
I was a little annoyed, at first, that in Sparks - as in Ember - jobs for Emberites seemed to be assigned randomly, whereas a much more effective plan would have been to divide labor according to people's talents and interests. Luckily, the book redeemed itself on this point at the very end.
I am happy with this book's ending, and I actually don't feel compelled to read the next book in the series, but I probably will. Meanwhile, Isabelle has read the first chapter or so of this book, but she keep stalling and I wonder if she'll finish it.
I'm surprising myself by giving this book 5 stars. I keep trying to think of reasons to downgrade my rating, but I just can't think of any. Maybe if I had more extensive post-apocalyptic reading under my belt, I would be less impressed by this book, but as it is, I just really liked it.
This book starts with a couple chapters that I really think should have been in the first book. The people of Ember have come out of from underground, and they now need to somehow put together a new life for themselves in this big, open world they have discovered.
Mostly, this book is a discourse on war. There's nothing new in it for me, but considering the target audience, I think this book would be a really valuable read for kids in elementary and middle school. I think the author did a remarkable job crafting the two communities - the people of Ember and the people of Sparks - and exploring the emotions and thought processes of various characters. Young readers will get a glimpse into the dark side of human nature, but hopefully be left with the idea that goodness can prevail despite injustices - it just might involve making hard choices and finding solutions where there seem to be none. The book examines questions of morality versus survival, and charisma versus actual leadership. I especially liked the way the book delves into Doon's uncertain fascination with Tick, and Torren's angry outbursts.
Maddy quickly became one of my favorite characters, and I only wished that her role was bigger.
I was a little annoyed, at first, that in Sparks - as in Ember - jobs for Emberites seemed to be assigned randomly, whereas a much more effective plan would have been to divide labor according to people's talents and interests. Luckily, the book redeemed itself on this point at the very end.
I am happy with this book's ending, and I actually don't feel compelled to read the next book in the series, but I probably will. Meanwhile, Isabelle has read the first chapter or so of this book, but she keep stalling and I wonder if she'll finish it.
City of Ember (2008)
★★½
I was disappointed by this movie in so many ways.
First, I will say that I liked the look of Ember in the movie even more than how I had pictured it to look in my mind's eye. I also liked the casting for Lina a lot.
And now for the things I didn't like...
The movie did not do as good of a job as the book in showing how the city of Ember was falling apart. A big deal was made in the book about how Lina longed for colored pencils, but in the movie she had assorted crayons readily available.
In the book, Lina sensibly carried around just the paper on which were printed the instructions. Why did the movie have her lugging around the big box everywhere?! There was a key in the box - that wasn't in the book - but that could easily have been carried in a pocket, as the mayor had carried his.
I didn't like how Mrs. Murdo was made into a flake, and I didn't think changing Lina's father's story really added anything at all.
The enormously sized insects were just weird.
The manner of egress was may more complex than it was in the book, which made it less believable because the movie's method depended on mechanisms still working 200+ years after they were built, whereas the book's method was simple and relied only on the continued existence of the river.
My absolute favorite part of the book - the existential image conjured up when Doon and Lina looked down upon their city - was fleeting at best. The movie poster itself was misleading, as I don't recall seeing any scene in the movie in which Lina and Doon were so closely above Ember.
Even in the book, the way in which Lina and Doon passed on the instructions to the rest of the people of Ember was pretty far-fetched, and hardly a reliable method at all, but the scene in the movie was even more unbelievable.
Finally, I had high hopes that the movie would provide better closure by incorporating information provided in the second chapter of the sequel, The People of Sparks. Alas, it did not, and the movie ended in the same way as the book, e.g., with me saying, "It ends just like that?!"
I was disappointed by this movie in so many ways.
First, I will say that I liked the look of Ember in the movie even more than how I had pictured it to look in my mind's eye. I also liked the casting for Lina a lot.
And now for the things I didn't like...
The movie did not do as good of a job as the book in showing how the city of Ember was falling apart. A big deal was made in the book about how Lina longed for colored pencils, but in the movie she had assorted crayons readily available.
In the book, Lina sensibly carried around just the paper on which were printed the instructions. Why did the movie have her lugging around the big box everywhere?! There was a key in the box - that wasn't in the book - but that could easily have been carried in a pocket, as the mayor had carried his.
I didn't like how Mrs. Murdo was made into a flake, and I didn't think changing Lina's father's story really added anything at all.
The enormously sized insects were just weird.
The manner of egress was may more complex than it was in the book, which made it less believable because the movie's method depended on mechanisms still working 200+ years after they were built, whereas the book's method was simple and relied only on the continued existence of the river.
My absolute favorite part of the book - the existential image conjured up when Doon and Lina looked down upon their city - was fleeting at best. The movie poster itself was misleading, as I don't recall seeing any scene in the movie in which Lina and Doon were so closely above Ember.
Even in the book, the way in which Lina and Doon passed on the instructions to the rest of the people of Ember was pretty far-fetched, and hardly a reliable method at all, but the scene in the movie was even more unbelievable.
Finally, I had high hopes that the movie would provide better closure by incorporating information provided in the second chapter of the sequel, The People of Sparks. Alas, it did not, and the movie ended in the same way as the book, e.g., with me saying, "It ends just like that?!"
The Secret Garden (1993)
★★★½
Of course, after reading the the book, I had to watch a film adaptation! I managed to talk Isabelle and Sebastien into watching it with me, and a nice, cozy time was had by all.
I was pleasantly surprised to see Professor McGonagall cast as Mrs. Medlock, but then I was disappointed to see that Mrs. Medlock was a bit harsher than I imagined her to be in the book. As might be expected, there were quite a few deviations from the book, mostly for the sake of moving the story along, I think. A few new details were thrown in, maybe to add drama and poignancy. It was too bad, but understandable, that Martha's mother was left out entirely.
I liked seeing a grand, full-color representation of the gorgeous secret garden.
Though the ending itself was just as it should be, I didn't like that in order to get there, this movie version had Mary relapsing into a bout of contrariness. Her transformation in the movie was not quite as dramatic as it was in the book.
The acting (by the children) was sometimes less than natural, and at times the pace just seemed slow.
Of course, after reading the the book, I had to watch a film adaptation! I managed to talk Isabelle and Sebastien into watching it with me, and a nice, cozy time was had by all.
I was pleasantly surprised to see Professor McGonagall cast as Mrs. Medlock, but then I was disappointed to see that Mrs. Medlock was a bit harsher than I imagined her to be in the book. As might be expected, there were quite a few deviations from the book, mostly for the sake of moving the story along, I think. A few new details were thrown in, maybe to add drama and poignancy. It was too bad, but understandable, that Martha's mother was left out entirely.
I liked seeing a grand, full-color representation of the gorgeous secret garden.
Though the ending itself was just as it should be, I didn't like that in order to get there, this movie version had Mary relapsing into a bout of contrariness. Her transformation in the movie was not quite as dramatic as it was in the book.
The acting (by the children) was sometimes less than natural, and at times the pace just seemed slow.
Thursday, December 12, 2013
The City of Ember (The Books of Ember #1) by Jeanne DuPrau
★★★★
Ken picked this book up at the library for Isabelle. It was in the children's section, and he thought the movie adaptation was interesting (he randomly borrowed it from the library a few years ago), so he figured why not. I had never heard of it. This was Isabelle's first science-fiction read, and I have to admit, given her usual taste in books (e.g., fairies, books about girls who dance or garden or who are just growing up and having adventures), I was surprised - and pleased! - by how much she enjoyed this book.
I was surprised, too, by how much I liked this book myself. The two main characters are Lina (a girl) and Doon (a boy), so it's nice that this book can appeal to both girls and boys. Lina - like many protagonists of children's book - is an orphan, and Doon - like many other protagonists of children's books - has a tendency to not share important information with adults. They realize that Ember, their city, is falling apart, and they look for a solution to help save their people.
It was interesting how, in the city of Ember, everything was old - broken, repaired, faded - or non-existent. Maybe young readers might realize how lucky they are to even have things like colored pencils, and to have new clothes and furniture - not at all stained or torn or dingy.
I liked that Lina and Doon did not just embark on a mission as two exceptionally competent children. When Lina comes upon a mysterious document, she does try to recruit adults to help her. It's not her fault they weren't much help. I do wish, though, that Doon hadn't kept everything secret from his father.
I was also kind of annoyed that when Lina discovered the hidden document, she and Doon didn't spend any time wondering where it came from. We readers know the answer, of course, but it still seemed like Lina and Doon should have been a little curious about how the document came to be found by Lina.
I also thought the idea of having randomly assigned jobs was ridiculous. I would think that in an enclosed city with limited resources, each person would be assigned a job based first on their actual abilities and potential in a given field.
Anyway, the book is a very fast read. Enough information is laid down so that you basically know exactly what is going to happen, but you keep reading because of the suspense in wanting to know how it happens. Still, at the very end, I literally exclaimed to Isabelle, "It ends just like that?!" And Isabelle said, "Yeah, I thought there should be more." I've already started the next book in the series, The People of Sparks, and I really think the second chapter in that book ought to have been included in this book instead.
Ken picked this book up at the library for Isabelle. It was in the children's section, and he thought the movie adaptation was interesting (he randomly borrowed it from the library a few years ago), so he figured why not. I had never heard of it. This was Isabelle's first science-fiction read, and I have to admit, given her usual taste in books (e.g., fairies, books about girls who dance or garden or who are just growing up and having adventures), I was surprised - and pleased! - by how much she enjoyed this book.
I was surprised, too, by how much I liked this book myself. The two main characters are Lina (a girl) and Doon (a boy), so it's nice that this book can appeal to both girls and boys. Lina - like many protagonists of children's book - is an orphan, and Doon - like many other protagonists of children's books - has a tendency to not share important information with adults. They realize that Ember, their city, is falling apart, and they look for a solution to help save their people.
It was interesting how, in the city of Ember, everything was old - broken, repaired, faded - or non-existent. Maybe young readers might realize how lucky they are to even have things like colored pencils, and to have new clothes and furniture - not at all stained or torn or dingy.
I liked that Lina and Doon did not just embark on a mission as two exceptionally competent children. When Lina comes upon a mysterious document, she does try to recruit adults to help her. It's not her fault they weren't much help. I do wish, though, that Doon hadn't kept everything secret from his father.
I was also kind of annoyed that when Lina discovered the hidden document, she and Doon didn't spend any time wondering where it came from. We readers know the answer, of course, but it still seemed like Lina and Doon should have been a little curious about how the document came to be found by Lina.
I also thought the idea of having randomly assigned jobs was ridiculous. I would think that in an enclosed city with limited resources, each person would be assigned a job based first on their actual abilities and potential in a given field.
Anyway, the book is a very fast read. Enough information is laid down so that you basically know exactly what is going to happen, but you keep reading because of the suspense in wanting to know how it happens. Still, at the very end, I literally exclaimed to Isabelle, "It ends just like that?!" And Isabelle said, "Yeah, I thought there should be more." I've already started the next book in the series, The People of Sparks, and I really think the second chapter in that book ought to have been included in this book instead.
Sunday, December 8, 2013
Ender's Game (Ender #1) by Orson Scott Card
★★★★½
Ken says that if I had read this book as a teenager, I'd probably give it straight up 5 stars. I can see how young people reading this book might have a much more formative experience, which kind of makes me regret not having read it earlier.
The whole Battle School institution was an intriguing concept. Though the book held my interest throughout, it felt like everything was being laid out to set up something bigger, and I kept wondering when something would really happen. When it finally came down to it, I liked the ending, and I was not disappointed.
I liked that the book detailed Ender's inner thought processes, so we could easily see how he was a genius in the way he perceived, interpreted, and responded to other people's actions. I kept forgetting that he was only a child because the extent of his capabilities were so advanced. I had to repeatedly remind myself that he was identified as the most exceptionally gifted child in the world.
I was a little annoyed that everyone kept referring to the aliens as "buggers". Didn't they have an official, less childish name? And why didn't people use it? (Ken says other books in the series do reference a more formal name for the aliens.)
The Peter / Valentine personality dichotomy was interesting, and I liked how they teamed up later on, but I wish the book had gone into more detail about what their political philosophies were. For example, apparently Valentine actually coined new phrases in her popular writings - but what kind of phrases? I think it'd be fun to know. Maybe the lack of political details actually made the book more readable for younger audiences, so I shouldn't hold that against the book.
The version I read had a great introduction by the author, which I think really did provide additional insight that allowed me to better appreciate the book.
Ken says that if I had read this book as a teenager, I'd probably give it straight up 5 stars. I can see how young people reading this book might have a much more formative experience, which kind of makes me regret not having read it earlier.
The whole Battle School institution was an intriguing concept. Though the book held my interest throughout, it felt like everything was being laid out to set up something bigger, and I kept wondering when something would really happen. When it finally came down to it, I liked the ending, and I was not disappointed.
I liked that the book detailed Ender's inner thought processes, so we could easily see how he was a genius in the way he perceived, interpreted, and responded to other people's actions. I kept forgetting that he was only a child because the extent of his capabilities were so advanced. I had to repeatedly remind myself that he was identified as the most exceptionally gifted child in the world.
I was a little annoyed that everyone kept referring to the aliens as "buggers". Didn't they have an official, less childish name? And why didn't people use it? (Ken says other books in the series do reference a more formal name for the aliens.)
The Peter / Valentine personality dichotomy was interesting, and I liked how they teamed up later on, but I wish the book had gone into more detail about what their political philosophies were. For example, apparently Valentine actually coined new phrases in her popular writings - but what kind of phrases? I think it'd be fun to know. Maybe the lack of political details actually made the book more readable for younger audiences, so I shouldn't hold that against the book.
The version I read had a great introduction by the author, which I think really did provide additional insight that allowed me to better appreciate the book.
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Two Sons of China by Andrew Lam
★★★★
I received an advance copy of this book for review.
Upon receipt of the book, I was immediately struck by the cover design. One of the "two sons of China" is Caucasian! He is an American soldier who had been born and raised in China, the son of missionaries. He seeks action in China during World War II, partly as a distraction from his own personal demons. The other "son" referred to in the title is a native Chinese man, a member of the Communist party for whom the fight to save his homeland from Japanese invaders is personal. The two soldiers, each holding his own beliefs, fight alongside each other and forge a friendship.
This book is well-written and descriptive. As might be expected in a story that takes place during a war, some passages are violent and graphic, though they are generally kept brief and matter-of-fact. The dialogue sounds natural, and the story is well-paced. Many times, it was easy to envision the scenes playing out on a big screen. There are exciting and suspenseful action sequences as well as some tender moments of romance. Events unfold naturally, though a couple unexpected twists popped up, too.
Being Chinese myself, I appreciated that every now and then, a character's words or actions gave insight into Chinese philosophies. These details illustrating the Chinese psyche gave the book as a whole a certain level of credibility.
In the interest of full disclosure, I will mention that my grandfather was a general in the Nationalist army during World War II. I think having a basic understanding of Chinese history would be helpful when reading this book, as knowing that the Communists and the Nationalists were at odds with each other, even as they both fought to dispel the Japanese, helps to put events in context more easily. Still, background knowledge is not necessary because the author sets up the time period in a very accessible way, and in fact, this book may even be a suitable introduction to modern Chinese history.
Early on, I briefly wondered if the book sought to sympathize with the Communists, but as the story unfolded, the narrative seemed to provide for a balanced perspective of both sides. I was especially impressed with how well the story depicted the shortcomings of both political parties.
As the two main characters get to know each other, it's no surprise that religion and politics are discussed. I liked that there was no heavy-handed proselytizing in this book, and it's not pedantic, either. Instead, there is just enough religion and politics to help develop the characters and put conversations and events into perspective.
While I enjoyed the writing as whole, there were a few isolated incidences of what I thought may have been questionable word choice... In the very beginning (on page 7 of my edition), a Chinese character speaks English, and his accent was specifically highlighted when the author used "Stih-weh" for "Stilwell" in the dialogue. Since all Chinese characters in the book presumably spoke English with a Chinese accent, was it necessary to emphasize the accent? It came across a bit like the way people might poke fun at English language learners. Also, in a chapter entirely focused on native Chinese people (on page 33), one man is referred to as a "Chinaman", which struck me as odd in that context, as if the third-person omniscient narrator had a Western bias. The word "Chinaman" is generally considered to be an American English construct with derogatory connotations, and its use a little later (on page 42) among American military officers was more fitting. Finally, I was put off by a few character descriptions that seemed to reinforce the negative stereotype of Asian men being short, slight, and weak. On page 63, a man is said to be "exceptionally tall and heavyset for a Chinese man," and on page 230, a man is described as being "unusually large and muscular for a Japanese" (emphasis mine). (Think: "She's smart for a girl.") Couldn't the descriptions have worked just as well without the ethnic qualifiers?
The book's poignant ending left me satisfied (and even a bit tearful), but I still wished a couple loose ends had been tied up a little more nicely. Without giving anything away that would require a spoiler warning, I will say that I was disappointed that one character never faced justice for a significant act of betrayal. Also, earlier in the book, it seemed as if two supporting characters were being positioned for an important role later on... but they weren't, and I wondered what happened to them.
Any time I read historical fiction - or see a movie "based on a true story" - I am always curious to know which parts of the story were based on fact, and which parts were fiction. I really appreciated the informative historical notes at the end of this book that told a bit about the actual Dixie Mission and some of the real-life players.
Overall, a complex backdrop for a gripping tale that held my interest throughout. A really good read.
I received an advance copy of this book for review.
Upon receipt of the book, I was immediately struck by the cover design. One of the "two sons of China" is Caucasian! He is an American soldier who had been born and raised in China, the son of missionaries. He seeks action in China during World War II, partly as a distraction from his own personal demons. The other "son" referred to in the title is a native Chinese man, a member of the Communist party for whom the fight to save his homeland from Japanese invaders is personal. The two soldiers, each holding his own beliefs, fight alongside each other and forge a friendship.
This book is well-written and descriptive. As might be expected in a story that takes place during a war, some passages are violent and graphic, though they are generally kept brief and matter-of-fact. The dialogue sounds natural, and the story is well-paced. Many times, it was easy to envision the scenes playing out on a big screen. There are exciting and suspenseful action sequences as well as some tender moments of romance. Events unfold naturally, though a couple unexpected twists popped up, too.
Being Chinese myself, I appreciated that every now and then, a character's words or actions gave insight into Chinese philosophies. These details illustrating the Chinese psyche gave the book as a whole a certain level of credibility.
In the interest of full disclosure, I will mention that my grandfather was a general in the Nationalist army during World War II. I think having a basic understanding of Chinese history would be helpful when reading this book, as knowing that the Communists and the Nationalists were at odds with each other, even as they both fought to dispel the Japanese, helps to put events in context more easily. Still, background knowledge is not necessary because the author sets up the time period in a very accessible way, and in fact, this book may even be a suitable introduction to modern Chinese history.
Early on, I briefly wondered if the book sought to sympathize with the Communists, but as the story unfolded, the narrative seemed to provide for a balanced perspective of both sides. I was especially impressed with how well the story depicted the shortcomings of both political parties.
As the two main characters get to know each other, it's no surprise that religion and politics are discussed. I liked that there was no heavy-handed proselytizing in this book, and it's not pedantic, either. Instead, there is just enough religion and politics to help develop the characters and put conversations and events into perspective.
While I enjoyed the writing as whole, there were a few isolated incidences of what I thought may have been questionable word choice... In the very beginning (on page 7 of my edition), a Chinese character speaks English, and his accent was specifically highlighted when the author used "Stih-weh" for "Stilwell" in the dialogue. Since all Chinese characters in the book presumably spoke English with a Chinese accent, was it necessary to emphasize the accent? It came across a bit like the way people might poke fun at English language learners. Also, in a chapter entirely focused on native Chinese people (on page 33), one man is referred to as a "Chinaman", which struck me as odd in that context, as if the third-person omniscient narrator had a Western bias. The word "Chinaman" is generally considered to be an American English construct with derogatory connotations, and its use a little later (on page 42) among American military officers was more fitting. Finally, I was put off by a few character descriptions that seemed to reinforce the negative stereotype of Asian men being short, slight, and weak. On page 63, a man is said to be "exceptionally tall and heavyset for a Chinese man," and on page 230, a man is described as being "unusually large and muscular for a Japanese" (emphasis mine). (Think: "She's smart for a girl.") Couldn't the descriptions have worked just as well without the ethnic qualifiers?
The book's poignant ending left me satisfied (and even a bit tearful), but I still wished a couple loose ends had been tied up a little more nicely. Without giving anything away that would require a spoiler warning, I will say that I was disappointed that one character never faced justice for a significant act of betrayal. Also, earlier in the book, it seemed as if two supporting characters were being positioned for an important role later on... but they weren't, and I wondered what happened to them.
Any time I read historical fiction - or see a movie "based on a true story" - I am always curious to know which parts of the story were based on fact, and which parts were fiction. I really appreciated the informative historical notes at the end of this book that told a bit about the actual Dixie Mission and some of the real-life players.
Overall, a complex backdrop for a gripping tale that held my interest throughout. A really good read.
Monday, December 2, 2013
The Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson Burnett
★★★★½
I clearly remember coming across this book as a child, and knowing that other people thought it was a book worth reading. Somehow, though, a book about "a secret garden" just didn't interest me, and so I didn't read it.
In retrospect, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have appreciated it anyway. But now, as an adult, I can see why this book is so popular.
Basically, the story is about a 10-year-old girl named Mary Lennox who is orphaned and sent to live with her estranged uncle. This uncle owns a huge estate which hides a few secrets, including a garden. From the beginning, the circumstances and character of Mary Lennox made for very compelling reading. I was quickly drawn in and wanted to know what happens to her. New characters are introduced well into the first half of the book, and each character is even more interesting than the last. As Mary gets used to her new home and new surroundings, she learns much about herself, about the people around her, and about the joy of fostering growth in a living thing.
The story itself is well-suited for elementary school-aged children, but it may be a challenge for younger readers, partly because of the author's occasional use of "broad Yorkshire". Dialogue written in this dialect (which, for example, uses "tha" for "thou / you") may be difficult for young readers to parse. Isabelle tried to read this book (she received it as a gift), and though she made progress, I got the feeling she was glossing over parts. We decided to read the book together - me reading aloud to her - and we both enjoyed it immensely.
We actually read a really fantastic illustrated edition. The color illustrations were soft, with muted colors, but they did bring all the characters to life. There was a picture every 1-2 pages or so. Every now and then we did get a two-page spread of just text, but that was more than made up for by the occasional two-page spread of illustration. The book was truly a delight to read.
So, with all the high praise, why not 5 stars? I have to admit, towards the end, all the talk about "the magic of things growing" just got kind of long-winded.
I clearly remember coming across this book as a child, and knowing that other people thought it was a book worth reading. Somehow, though, a book about "a secret garden" just didn't interest me, and so I didn't read it.
In retrospect, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have appreciated it anyway. But now, as an adult, I can see why this book is so popular.
Basically, the story is about a 10-year-old girl named Mary Lennox who is orphaned and sent to live with her estranged uncle. This uncle owns a huge estate which hides a few secrets, including a garden. From the beginning, the circumstances and character of Mary Lennox made for very compelling reading. I was quickly drawn in and wanted to know what happens to her. New characters are introduced well into the first half of the book, and each character is even more interesting than the last. As Mary gets used to her new home and new surroundings, she learns much about herself, about the people around her, and about the joy of fostering growth in a living thing.
The story itself is well-suited for elementary school-aged children, but it may be a challenge for younger readers, partly because of the author's occasional use of "broad Yorkshire". Dialogue written in this dialect (which, for example, uses "tha" for "thou / you") may be difficult for young readers to parse. Isabelle tried to read this book (she received it as a gift), and though she made progress, I got the feeling she was glossing over parts. We decided to read the book together - me reading aloud to her - and we both enjoyed it immensely.
We actually read a really fantastic illustrated edition. The color illustrations were soft, with muted colors, but they did bring all the characters to life. There was a picture every 1-2 pages or so. Every now and then we did get a two-page spread of just text, but that was more than made up for by the occasional two-page spread of illustration. The book was truly a delight to read.
So, with all the high praise, why not 5 stars? I have to admit, towards the end, all the talk about "the magic of things growing" just got kind of long-winded.
Monday, October 21, 2013
The Shoe Books Roundup
I haven't finished reading all the "shoe books" yet, but I figured I might as well start the roundup post. I'm not even sure if I'll be able to read all the books because many of them are out of print, and some are not available at our local library - not even in our library's entire consortium!
Mostly, these books are just variations on a theme: orphaned children with little money have some kind of talent. Though the basic premise may be similar among the books, it's interesting to see the different perspectives presented. Maybe a child has an obvious talent and it needs to be developed. In that case, is the child willing to train? Does the child like having an audience? Or, maybe the child has no obvious talent, but is able to discover a talent later on. In pretty much all the books, at least one talented child is sure to learn that "pride comes before a fall".
Within the series, there are only two pairs of books that are actually related, and really, those are the only ones that need to be read in the proper order relative to each other. Ballet Shoes should be read before Theatre Shoes, and Family Shoes should be read before New Shoes (though I haven't personally gotten to those two books yet). All the other books are stand-alone books that are completely unrelated to the others, so they can be read in no particular order.
Mostly, these books are just variations on a theme: orphaned children with little money have some kind of talent. Though the basic premise may be similar among the books, it's interesting to see the different perspectives presented. Maybe a child has an obvious talent and it needs to be developed. In that case, is the child willing to train? Does the child like having an audience? Or, maybe the child has no obvious talent, but is able to discover a talent later on. In pretty much all the books, at least one talented child is sure to learn that "pride comes before a fall".
Within the series, there are only two pairs of books that are actually related, and really, those are the only ones that need to be read in the proper order relative to each other. Ballet Shoes should be read before Theatre Shoes, and Family Shoes should be read before New Shoes (though I haven't personally gotten to those two books yet). All the other books are stand-alone books that are completely unrelated to the others, so they can be read in no particular order.
- Ballet Shoes (#1) ★★★★½
- Tennis Shoes (#2) ★★★
- Theater Shoes (#4) ★★★★½
- Party Shoes (#5) ★★½
- Skating Shoes (#7) ★★★★½
- Dancing Shoes (#9) ★★★½
Party Shoes (The Shoe Books #5) by Noel Streatfeild
★★½
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
This book was quite different from the other Shoe Books that I've read so far, and I actually found it somewhat boring. Even though there are still books in the series that I haven't read yet, I think I'll take a break from them for a while.
One of the main characters, Selina, is a temporary orphan who lives with her aunt and uncle, who have six children of their own. Unlike the other Shoe Books, we don't learn right away why Selina is living with her cousins. This lack of information was a little annoying in the beginning, but rest assured, you do find out the reason eventually.
The whole premise of the book seemed more fitting for a short story than a full-length novel. Selina receives a lovely party dress and matching shoes from her godmother in America (the story takes place in England), but since there is no upcoming event to which she can wear the dress, all the children get together and plan a pageant, just so Selina can wear her dress. Right away, the whole idea of planning an event around one dress seemed silly. Just let her wear the dress around the house! But I suppose in those days, everything was proper and people didn't do things like that.
It was a cute enough story at first. Each of the older children took responsibility for writing and planning one act of the pageant. Unlike other Shoe Books, stage talent isn't a central theme. Sally does apparently have a talent for dancing, but it's not anywhere near the focus of this book.
Instead, this book shows the reader all the work that goes on behind the scenes of a big production. The kids need to reserve a venue (a nearby Abbey that is soon to be sold), write their acts, engage actors and dancers to participate, plan and run rehearsals, and manage costumes for the entire cast. Phew! It was a lot of work, and I did enjoy the way the children's parents really got involved. Still, for the most part, it didn't make for every exciting or compelling reading.
In fact, the whole production started to become rather unbelievable when Phillip, an injured soldier who produced plays before the war, and who grew up living in the Abbey, started to take an interest in the pageant. The children had put so much work into their acts, and then Phillip came along and usurped the entire production! I felt indignant on the children's behalf, even though they were all, eventually, quite happy with their roles in the pageant. As the production grew bigger and bigger, everything just seemed to get more ridiculous.
It wasn't until towards the end of the book that finally everything started to come together, and I accepted the grand nature of the pageant. Instead of just being an event at which Selina can wear her dress, the pageant was also a realization of Phillip's dream to put on a production at the Abbey, and it was a fitting farewell for the Day family, who were moving out of the Abbey after many generations of Days had lived there. And I admit, it was satisfying to see the entire community rally behind the production.
I really enjoyed the ending, particularly the final four or five chapters, and I was glad to feel rewarded for having invested all that time reading the previous chapters.
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
This book was quite different from the other Shoe Books that I've read so far, and I actually found it somewhat boring. Even though there are still books in the series that I haven't read yet, I think I'll take a break from them for a while.
One of the main characters, Selina, is a temporary orphan who lives with her aunt and uncle, who have six children of their own. Unlike the other Shoe Books, we don't learn right away why Selina is living with her cousins. This lack of information was a little annoying in the beginning, but rest assured, you do find out the reason eventually.
The whole premise of the book seemed more fitting for a short story than a full-length novel. Selina receives a lovely party dress and matching shoes from her godmother in America (the story takes place in England), but since there is no upcoming event to which she can wear the dress, all the children get together and plan a pageant, just so Selina can wear her dress. Right away, the whole idea of planning an event around one dress seemed silly. Just let her wear the dress around the house! But I suppose in those days, everything was proper and people didn't do things like that.
It was a cute enough story at first. Each of the older children took responsibility for writing and planning one act of the pageant. Unlike other Shoe Books, stage talent isn't a central theme. Sally does apparently have a talent for dancing, but it's not anywhere near the focus of this book.
Instead, this book shows the reader all the work that goes on behind the scenes of a big production. The kids need to reserve a venue (a nearby Abbey that is soon to be sold), write their acts, engage actors and dancers to participate, plan and run rehearsals, and manage costumes for the entire cast. Phew! It was a lot of work, and I did enjoy the way the children's parents really got involved. Still, for the most part, it didn't make for every exciting or compelling reading.
In fact, the whole production started to become rather unbelievable when Phillip, an injured soldier who produced plays before the war, and who grew up living in the Abbey, started to take an interest in the pageant. The children had put so much work into their acts, and then Phillip came along and usurped the entire production! I felt indignant on the children's behalf, even though they were all, eventually, quite happy with their roles in the pageant. As the production grew bigger and bigger, everything just seemed to get more ridiculous.
It wasn't until towards the end of the book that finally everything started to come together, and I accepted the grand nature of the pageant. Instead of just being an event at which Selina can wear her dress, the pageant was also a realization of Phillip's dream to put on a production at the Abbey, and it was a fitting farewell for the Day family, who were moving out of the Abbey after many generations of Days had lived there. And I admit, it was satisfying to see the entire community rally behind the production.
I really enjoyed the ending, particularly the final four or five chapters, and I was glad to feel rewarded for having invested all that time reading the previous chapters.
Labels:
book,
book: 2-and-a-half stars,
children,
series
Magic Tree House Series by Mary Pope Osborne
★★★
I usually prefer to rate books individually, but I think in this case, I'll just rate the series as a whole.
These books are formulaic, but that's about par for the course for series at this reading level. I think it's part of what keeps kids interested, actually, having some adventure and suspense, but always knowing how it will turn out. Jack and Annie are mostly one-dimensional and predictable, with Annie running headlong into adventures and Jack preferring to proceed cautiously. It's kind of funny how much Jack likes to say, "Oh, man" and "Oh, brother," but I do like the way he takes notes in his notebook. It's cool, too, that every book has a different theme, so young readers are exposed to lots of different time periods, places, people, and animals.
Ken and I are reading this series to Sebastien, and I have to give these books credit for piquing Sebastien's interest in books. Before, while we always made an effort to read to him every day, he rarely ever suggested reading as an activity on his own. Now with this series, he can't wait to get ready for bed so we can read more chapters! He's even asked to read these books in the middle of the day, when he's usually more interested in other toys and activities. Part of me wants to save these books so he can read them on his own when he learns to read, but I'm just going to continue to plow through them as much as he wants now, since I want to encourage his interest in books.
One thing that I don't like about these books, though - and it's especially annoying given how popular this series is with early readers - is how often they include incomplete sentences! I just think early readers should be exposed to proper grammar. :P Sure, sometimes it's okay, if a particular clause should carry some emphasis. But unnecessarily breaking sentences into one full sentence and a second incomplete sentence just happens way too often. Here are some examples in book #4:
Page 3: They splashed through puddles. Until they came to the tallest oak tree in the woods.
Page 13: Then he rolled up his jeans. And ran across the hot sand into the waves.
Page 13: He shielded his eyes against the sun. And peered out at the sea.
Page 27: Together they started to back slowly away from the pirates. Toward the tree house.
Update #1:I just finished reading Book #8, Midnight on the Moon, and I was pleased to find that there were no unnecessary sentence fragments! (There were a couple fragments that I thought were fine in context, like in dialogue or used for emphasis.) Ken actually read the last couple books with Sebastien, so I don't know for sure which book along the way was the first without fragments, but I'm optimistic that the books will be grammatically correct from here on out!
Update #2: We are now reading Book #12, Polar Bears Past Bedtime, and so far, the books seem to be ordered in groups of four. In the first four books (#1-4), Jack and Annie find four clues that eventually lead them to Morgan Le Fey. In the next four books (#5-8), Jack and Annie have to find four items that begin with M in order to rescue Morgan Le Fey. In the next four books (#9-12), Jack and Annie have to solve four riddles in order to become master librarians. I assume this pattern keeps up, and it's worth mentioning because a children's librarian at our local library told me that many kids read these books all out of order without any regard to the numbering. I think it's probably best to read them in order, but if you're going to jump around, the next best plan might be to read them according to the four-book sub-series, so at least you can put the specific adventure into a bigger context.
Update #3 - March, 2014: We made it up to Book #41, Moonlight on the Magic Flute, before Sebastien finally lost interest and didn't want to read the next book. Forty-one books! Not bad. Maybe when he learns to read, he'll pick up the series himself where we left off!
I usually prefer to rate books individually, but I think in this case, I'll just rate the series as a whole.
These books are formulaic, but that's about par for the course for series at this reading level. I think it's part of what keeps kids interested, actually, having some adventure and suspense, but always knowing how it will turn out. Jack and Annie are mostly one-dimensional and predictable, with Annie running headlong into adventures and Jack preferring to proceed cautiously. It's kind of funny how much Jack likes to say, "Oh, man" and "Oh, brother," but I do like the way he takes notes in his notebook. It's cool, too, that every book has a different theme, so young readers are exposed to lots of different time periods, places, people, and animals.
Ken and I are reading this series to Sebastien, and I have to give these books credit for piquing Sebastien's interest in books. Before, while we always made an effort to read to him every day, he rarely ever suggested reading as an activity on his own. Now with this series, he can't wait to get ready for bed so we can read more chapters! He's even asked to read these books in the middle of the day, when he's usually more interested in other toys and activities. Part of me wants to save these books so he can read them on his own when he learns to read, but I'm just going to continue to plow through them as much as he wants now, since I want to encourage his interest in books.
One thing that I don't like about these books, though - and it's especially annoying given how popular this series is with early readers - is how often they include incomplete sentences! I just think early readers should be exposed to proper grammar. :P Sure, sometimes it's okay, if a particular clause should carry some emphasis. But unnecessarily breaking sentences into one full sentence and a second incomplete sentence just happens way too often. Here are some examples in book #4:
Page 3: They splashed through puddles. Until they came to the tallest oak tree in the woods.
Page 13: Then he rolled up his jeans. And ran across the hot sand into the waves.
Page 13: He shielded his eyes against the sun. And peered out at the sea.
Page 27: Together they started to back slowly away from the pirates. Toward the tree house.
Update #1:I just finished reading Book #8, Midnight on the Moon, and I was pleased to find that there were no unnecessary sentence fragments! (There were a couple fragments that I thought were fine in context, like in dialogue or used for emphasis.) Ken actually read the last couple books with Sebastien, so I don't know for sure which book along the way was the first without fragments, but I'm optimistic that the books will be grammatically correct from here on out!
Update #2: We are now reading Book #12, Polar Bears Past Bedtime, and so far, the books seem to be ordered in groups of four. In the first four books (#1-4), Jack and Annie find four clues that eventually lead them to Morgan Le Fey. In the next four books (#5-8), Jack and Annie have to find four items that begin with M in order to rescue Morgan Le Fey. In the next four books (#9-12), Jack and Annie have to solve four riddles in order to become master librarians. I assume this pattern keeps up, and it's worth mentioning because a children's librarian at our local library told me that many kids read these books all out of order without any regard to the numbering. I think it's probably best to read them in order, but if you're going to jump around, the next best plan might be to read them according to the four-book sub-series, so at least you can put the specific adventure into a bigger context.
Update #3 - March, 2014: We made it up to Book #41, Moonlight on the Magic Flute, before Sebastien finally lost interest and didn't want to read the next book. Forty-one books! Not bad. Maybe when he learns to read, he'll pick up the series himself where we left off!
Pippi Roundup
I have to say, I wasn't crazy about Pippi when I first met her, but she did grow on me!
- Pippi Longstocking ★★★
- Pippi Goes on Board ★★★★
- Pippi in the South Seas ★★★½
Sunday, October 6, 2013
Pippi in the South Seas (Pippi Longstocking #3) by Astrid Lindgren
★★★½
In this installment, Pippi, Tommy, and Annika visit Pippi's father on Kurrekurredutt Island in the South Seas. Even though the location has changed, most of the chapters had a bit of that "more of the same" feel.
Pippi is as adventurous, optimistic, brave, selfless, and loyal as always. While on the island, Pippi faces down two sea-faring bandits who were up to no good, similar to the way in which she handled two would-be burglars in the first book.
One chapter that stands out to me takes place before the children take their sea voyage. Pippi participates in a bizarre event in which some seemingly random person in town subjects all the school children to a high-stress verbal examination that results in either public praise or public shaming, depending on how well each child answers her questions. In this day and age, it seems like such a terrible situation in which the poor kids are labeled "good" or "stupid", and completely traumatized if the latter. Thankfully, Pippi saves a bunch of children from disgrace with her usual good-hearted sense of justice.
I particularly enjoyed the ending in which Pippi, as usual, completely and selflessly devotes her time and energy to making her dear friends Tommy and Annika happy. The last couple pages had a kind of wistfulness to them, as the three children hope to never grow up, and Tommy and Annika take comfort in knowing that Pippi will "always" be at Villa Villekulla.
In this installment, Pippi, Tommy, and Annika visit Pippi's father on Kurrekurredutt Island in the South Seas. Even though the location has changed, most of the chapters had a bit of that "more of the same" feel.
Pippi is as adventurous, optimistic, brave, selfless, and loyal as always. While on the island, Pippi faces down two sea-faring bandits who were up to no good, similar to the way in which she handled two would-be burglars in the first book.
One chapter that stands out to me takes place before the children take their sea voyage. Pippi participates in a bizarre event in which some seemingly random person in town subjects all the school children to a high-stress verbal examination that results in either public praise or public shaming, depending on how well each child answers her questions. In this day and age, it seems like such a terrible situation in which the poor kids are labeled "good" or "stupid", and completely traumatized if the latter. Thankfully, Pippi saves a bunch of children from disgrace with her usual good-hearted sense of justice.
I particularly enjoyed the ending in which Pippi, as usual, completely and selflessly devotes her time and energy to making her dear friends Tommy and Annika happy. The last couple pages had a kind of wistfulness to them, as the three children hope to never grow up, and Tommy and Annika take comfort in knowing that Pippi will "always" be at Villa Villekulla.
Labels:
book,
book: 3-and-a-half stars,
children,
series
Friday, October 4, 2013
Pippi Goes on Board (Pippi Longstocking #2) by Astrid Lindgren
★★★★
I was pleasantly surprised to find that I rather enjoyed this book quite a bit more than the first.
In this book, Pippi, Tommy, and Annika have all sorts of adventures that really showcase Pippi's generosity, loyalty, and kindness. Her heart is as big as her physical strength!
I liked that when Pippi spent a day with Tommy and Annika's class, their teacher used the opportunity to instruct her in proper behavior (finally Pippi gets some guidance!), and Pippi really seemed to want to learn to be good.
And when the three children basically took off on their own 2-night camping trip, I was impressed with Pippi's foresight! She brought all the necessary provisions, took good care of her friends, and even thought to leave a note for their parents.
But, again with the pistols and the talk about cannibals!
Okay, I'll read the next book in the series.
I was pleasantly surprised to find that I rather enjoyed this book quite a bit more than the first.
In this book, Pippi, Tommy, and Annika have all sorts of adventures that really showcase Pippi's generosity, loyalty, and kindness. Her heart is as big as her physical strength!
I liked that when Pippi spent a day with Tommy and Annika's class, their teacher used the opportunity to instruct her in proper behavior (finally Pippi gets some guidance!), and Pippi really seemed to want to learn to be good.
And when the three children basically took off on their own 2-night camping trip, I was impressed with Pippi's foresight! She brought all the necessary provisions, took good care of her friends, and even thought to leave a note for their parents.
But, again with the pistols and the talk about cannibals!
Okay, I'll read the next book in the series.
The Boxcar Children Roundup
It's so strange that I have such fond memories of having read these books as a kid, while also having so few memories about the actual stories themselves! Re-reading this series was truly like re-discovering them, since I only had the vaguest memories, and it was basically as if I were reading them for the first time.
I still plan to read all the original books in the series by Gertrude Chandler Warner, but I got sidetracked... Here's the roundup so far, and I'll update this post as I read additional books.
I still plan to read all the original books in the series by Gertrude Chandler Warner, but I got sidetracked... Here's the roundup so far, and I'll update this post as I read additional books.
- The Boxcar Children (#1) ★★★★
- Surprise Island (#2) ★★★★½
- The Yellow House Mystery (#3) ★★★
- Mystery Ranch (#4) ★★★★
- Mike's Mystery (#5) ★★★★
- Blue Bay Mystery (#6) ★★★★½
- The Woodshed Mystery (#7) ★★★½
- The Lighthouse Mystery (#8) ★★½
- Mountain Top Mystery (#9) ★★★
- Houseboat Mystery (#12) ★★★★
- Snowbound Mystery (#13) ★★★★
- Tree House Mystery (#14) ★★★★½
- Mystery Behind the Wall (#7) ★★★★
- Benny Uncovers a Mystery (#19) ★★★★
Monday, September 30, 2013
Pippi Longstocking (Pippi Longstocking #1) by Astrid Lindgren
★★★
Growing up, I knew there existed a fictional character named Pippi Longstocking, and I knew she had red hair and braids that stuck out. But that's pretty much about all I knew about her.
I found this series at the local library and picked up the first three books for Isabelle. She really enjoyed them, and she gave this one 5 stars. But, after reading it myself, I just can't bring myself to give it more than 3 stars. I can see why children would enjoy Pippi and her antics, but I think this kind of tall tale-ish storytelling just isn't my cup of tea. Yes, Pippi has a huge heart and can be very endearing! But, she can also be ridiculous and infuriating. :P
This book was originally published in Sweden in 1957, and it's kind of interesting to read an old-fashioned book through the lens of modern society. Even though Pippi is just nine years old, and her neighbors are presumably around the same age, there is talk about cannibals, and the kids play with real daggers and pistols! Of course it's easy to say that none of it is real, but it's still worth mentioning as a heads-up in light of today's hyper-sensitivity to guns.
Growing up, I knew there existed a fictional character named Pippi Longstocking, and I knew she had red hair and braids that stuck out. But that's pretty much about all I knew about her.
I found this series at the local library and picked up the first three books for Isabelle. She really enjoyed them, and she gave this one 5 stars. But, after reading it myself, I just can't bring myself to give it more than 3 stars. I can see why children would enjoy Pippi and her antics, but I think this kind of tall tale-ish storytelling just isn't my cup of tea. Yes, Pippi has a huge heart and can be very endearing! But, she can also be ridiculous and infuriating. :P
This book was originally published in Sweden in 1957, and it's kind of interesting to read an old-fashioned book through the lens of modern society. Even though Pippi is just nine years old, and her neighbors are presumably around the same age, there is talk about cannibals, and the kids play with real daggers and pistols! Of course it's easy to say that none of it is real, but it's still worth mentioning as a heads-up in light of today's hyper-sensitivity to guns.
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Skating Shoes (The Shoe Books #7) by Noel Streatfeild
★★★★½
*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***
This book is probably one of the most aptly named "shoe books" because skating shoes actually do play a role in the story.
Like many other "shoe books", this book features an orphan, Lalla. Readers may recognize the unlikable aunt / kind, helpful uncle paradigm from Dancing Shoes. Also, similar to the way adoptees were sometimes described as not "real" family members in Dancing Shoes, in Skating Shoes, the life of an only child is depicted rather sadly, making it perhaps not the best reading choice for insecure only children.
Though Lalla is certainly a primary character in the book, the true main character is Harriet, who has a wonderfully large family. For the first time in a "shoe book", we see some really positive family dynamics at work. Though George, the father, may have been rather inept, Olivia, the mother, was loving and sensible. Throw in two industrious older brothers (I enjoyed the side story about Alec and his paper route) and a comic relief younger brother, and you get just the kind of family Lalla longs for. Harriet has no nurse or governess, but of course Lalla does, and Harriet gets to share hers.
As with other "shoe books", this story featured a child with talent, and that talent was explored alongside other important character traits such as ambition and the ability to work hard. In some ways, Lalla reminded me of Susan in Tennis Shoes. Both girls had enough talent to stand out among observers, but both fell just short of being really great. Susan needed to work really, really hard to succeed, and even so, she didn't have the confidence of a champion and was too self-conscious in front of an audience. Lalla thrived in front of an audience, and she could work hard when she wanted to, but she lacked the passion for the "figures" part of figure skating. Besides coming to terms with their own shortcomings, both girls had the additional challenge of seeing a close loved one rise to potential greatness instead of them. I'm not sure how realistic it was, but I liked how neither Susan nor Lalla were jealous, but rather, each was happy to see her friend succeed, and was comfortable with her own lot in life.
It was interesting, too, how Tennis Shoes and Skating Shoes presented two opposing views of grooming children to be champions. In Tennis Shoes, Susan looked forward to winning lots of championship cups, but in Skating Shoes, the existence of so many cups was portrayed as vulgar. And while everyone seemed to support the idea of training children to be tennis stars, the majority of onlookers in Skating Shoes seemed to think it was downright silly to train a child to be a skating star.
Lalla may have been "a bit of a madam" sometimes, but rest assured, the author's favorite lesson - "pride comes before a fall" - was close at hand.
I was mostly pleased with the ending, but as usual, I still wished for more. It would have been nice if the book hadn't ended until we saw how Aunt Claudia reacted to Lalla not being a champion. Probably she would have been fine, after she realized that Lalla would still be a star, just a different kind of skater, and though that was implied, it would have been nice to have seen it through.
*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***
This book is probably one of the most aptly named "shoe books" because skating shoes actually do play a role in the story.
Like many other "shoe books", this book features an orphan, Lalla. Readers may recognize the unlikable aunt / kind, helpful uncle paradigm from Dancing Shoes. Also, similar to the way adoptees were sometimes described as not "real" family members in Dancing Shoes, in Skating Shoes, the life of an only child is depicted rather sadly, making it perhaps not the best reading choice for insecure only children.
Though Lalla is certainly a primary character in the book, the true main character is Harriet, who has a wonderfully large family. For the first time in a "shoe book", we see some really positive family dynamics at work. Though George, the father, may have been rather inept, Olivia, the mother, was loving and sensible. Throw in two industrious older brothers (I enjoyed the side story about Alec and his paper route) and a comic relief younger brother, and you get just the kind of family Lalla longs for. Harriet has no nurse or governess, but of course Lalla does, and Harriet gets to share hers.
As with other "shoe books", this story featured a child with talent, and that talent was explored alongside other important character traits such as ambition and the ability to work hard. In some ways, Lalla reminded me of Susan in Tennis Shoes. Both girls had enough talent to stand out among observers, but both fell just short of being really great. Susan needed to work really, really hard to succeed, and even so, she didn't have the confidence of a champion and was too self-conscious in front of an audience. Lalla thrived in front of an audience, and she could work hard when she wanted to, but she lacked the passion for the "figures" part of figure skating. Besides coming to terms with their own shortcomings, both girls had the additional challenge of seeing a close loved one rise to potential greatness instead of them. I'm not sure how realistic it was, but I liked how neither Susan nor Lalla were jealous, but rather, each was happy to see her friend succeed, and was comfortable with her own lot in life.
It was interesting, too, how Tennis Shoes and Skating Shoes presented two opposing views of grooming children to be champions. In Tennis Shoes, Susan looked forward to winning lots of championship cups, but in Skating Shoes, the existence of so many cups was portrayed as vulgar. And while everyone seemed to support the idea of training children to be tennis stars, the majority of onlookers in Skating Shoes seemed to think it was downright silly to train a child to be a skating star.
Lalla may have been "a bit of a madam" sometimes, but rest assured, the author's favorite lesson - "pride comes before a fall" - was close at hand.
I was mostly pleased with the ending, but as usual, I still wished for more. It would have been nice if the book hadn't ended until we saw how Aunt Claudia reacted to Lalla not being a champion. Probably she would have been fine, after she realized that Lalla would still be a star, just a different kind of skater, and though that was implied, it would have been nice to have seen it through.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Tennis Shoes (The Shoe Books #2) by Noel Streatfeild
★★★
This is the fourth "shoe book" that I've read, and so far it's my least favorite. For me, tennis as the talent du jour just wasn't as exciting or as interesting as the stage talents (dancing, acting, singing) of the other books.
And, dare I say it? Was the book less appealing because the children weren't orphans? In the other books, the children were surrounded by supportive caretakers - Garnie and Nana in Ballet Shoes, Hannah and Alice in Theater Shoes, and Pursey and Mrs. Storm in Dancing Shoes - who stood in for the children's missing parents. But in this book, Susan, Jim, Nicky, and David did have parents, and still, Pinny and Annie were the primary adults who supported and cared for them. Their mother basically popped in for a few cameos, while their father seemed like a gentler, British version of a male tiger mom.
As a children's book, this book may be a bit more difficult than the others for early elementary school readers. Young David - perhaps my favorite character - liked to use big words, and words that he spoke were frequently purposely misspelled to reflect his childlike pronunciation. The book also gets relatively detailed when recounting tennis matches, making certain excerpts a jumble of numbers unless the reader already understands how tennis is scored. And speaking of jumbles of numbers, there was also a lot of talk about money, as the family was not especially wealthy but needed money for tennis training. And honestly, with all the crowns, shillings, and pences being discussed, I really had no idea how much money anyone had.
As usual, the ending was abrupt and left me feeling disappointed. In this case, a very dramatic event occurred just before the ending, and I wasn't sure exactly what the point of it was, except maybe to present the lesson that just because a person is a star doesn't mean he/she can't also be a fool? Just seemed like somewhat of a sour note to end things on.
Still, I gave the book 3 stars because there was plenty also to enjoy. I liked that Pinny was a fountain of maxims, and I liked how familiar St. Clair's felt because its house structure so closely resembled Hogwarts.
Mostly I liked the nuanced character development. In previous books, we had talented children with ambition (Pauline, Posy), untalented children with other ambitions (Petrova), and talented children without ambition for that particular talent (Mark, Hilary). This time, in Susan, we had a child who was just talented enough to be noticed, but only if she worked really, really, really hard, and she had some ambition, but not a "champion temperament" (pg. 242). That is, she was willing to put in the work to become a star, but she lacked confidence and was self-conscious in front of an audience. Then there was Nicky, who certainly did have a champion temperament, and was talented to boot, but she was also lazy and needed to be taught self-discipline.
I always like it when books introduce readers to new ideas, and I can imagine that young readers today - who live in a world in which certain diseases are now rare - might be encountering "measles" and "mumps" for the first time. I suppose those illnesses seem old-fashioned these days.
I think this book is out of print, and the library edition we got is quite old, with a pretty uninteresting cover. I know you're not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but I'm pretty sure that's what Isabelle did, and she wasn't really interested in reading this one.
This is the fourth "shoe book" that I've read, and so far it's my least favorite. For me, tennis as the talent du jour just wasn't as exciting or as interesting as the stage talents (dancing, acting, singing) of the other books.
And, dare I say it? Was the book less appealing because the children weren't orphans? In the other books, the children were surrounded by supportive caretakers - Garnie and Nana in Ballet Shoes, Hannah and Alice in Theater Shoes, and Pursey and Mrs. Storm in Dancing Shoes - who stood in for the children's missing parents. But in this book, Susan, Jim, Nicky, and David did have parents, and still, Pinny and Annie were the primary adults who supported and cared for them. Their mother basically popped in for a few cameos, while their father seemed like a gentler, British version of a male tiger mom.
As a children's book, this book may be a bit more difficult than the others for early elementary school readers. Young David - perhaps my favorite character - liked to use big words, and words that he spoke were frequently purposely misspelled to reflect his childlike pronunciation. The book also gets relatively detailed when recounting tennis matches, making certain excerpts a jumble of numbers unless the reader already understands how tennis is scored. And speaking of jumbles of numbers, there was also a lot of talk about money, as the family was not especially wealthy but needed money for tennis training. And honestly, with all the crowns, shillings, and pences being discussed, I really had no idea how much money anyone had.
As usual, the ending was abrupt and left me feeling disappointed. In this case, a very dramatic event occurred just before the ending, and I wasn't sure exactly what the point of it was, except maybe to present the lesson that just because a person is a star doesn't mean he/she can't also be a fool? Just seemed like somewhat of a sour note to end things on.
Still, I gave the book 3 stars because there was plenty also to enjoy. I liked that Pinny was a fountain of maxims, and I liked how familiar St. Clair's felt because its house structure so closely resembled Hogwarts.
Mostly I liked the nuanced character development. In previous books, we had talented children with ambition (Pauline, Posy), untalented children with other ambitions (Petrova), and talented children without ambition for that particular talent (Mark, Hilary). This time, in Susan, we had a child who was just talented enough to be noticed, but only if she worked really, really, really hard, and she had some ambition, but not a "champion temperament" (pg. 242). That is, she was willing to put in the work to become a star, but she lacked confidence and was self-conscious in front of an audience. Then there was Nicky, who certainly did have a champion temperament, and was talented to boot, but she was also lazy and needed to be taught self-discipline.
I always like it when books introduce readers to new ideas, and I can imagine that young readers today - who live in a world in which certain diseases are now rare - might be encountering "measles" and "mumps" for the first time. I suppose those illnesses seem old-fashioned these days.
I think this book is out of print, and the library edition we got is quite old, with a pretty uninteresting cover. I know you're not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but I'm pretty sure that's what Isabelle did, and she wasn't really interested in reading this one.
Saturday, September 7, 2013
Dancing Shoes (The Shoe Books #9) by Noel Streatfeild
★★★½
After reading this book, I can't believe how much I want to say about it!
Isabelle didn't even finish this one. I was surprised because she gave 5 stars to both Ballet Shoes and Theatre Shoes, and how different could this book be? Once I started reading Dancing Shoes, however, I could see right away why she didn't like it.
On the surface, there is much about this book that is similar to the others. The main character, Rachel, is an orphan, and she and her adopted sister, Hilary, are forced to train for the stage. Hilary is naturally talented on the stage (like Pauline and Mark), but Rachel - we think - is not (like Petrova). In time, we find that even though Rachel can't dance, she can act (like Sorrel). Along the way, Rachel's cousin Dulcie learns that "pride will come before a fall" (the same lesson learned by Pauline and Miranda).
Unlike the other two books, however, this story begins with Rachel not yet orphaned. Her father died in an accident, but her mother is there to take care of her and Hilary, who was adopted by Rachel's father when her own parents died in a natural disaster. When Rachel's mother dies, we realize that poor young Hilary has lost two sets of parents! But, though Hilary is an important character in the book, it's really Rachel who is the main character. While we witness the ways in which Rachel deals with her mother's death, Hilary doesn't appear to deal with any emotions at all and just goes along with whatever is expected of her.
So, right off the bat, this book is different because the main character is trying to deal with the loss of her mother, and she feels a lot of anger. As you can imagine, it's kind of a downer. On top of that, the girls get taken in by Rachel's Aunt Cora, who is cold and not at all a sympathetic character. Because Hilary is not a "real" relation, Aunt Cora brushes her off as a second-class family member. Due to a huge misunderstanding that Rachel is unable to clear up, Aunt Cora has a completely inaccurate picture of who Rachel is and what her relationship with Hilary is like. So, for the first part of the book, the girls really had no one on their side (unlike the Fossils, who had a house full of supporters, and the Forbes children, who had Hannah and Alice).
If you can push through the disheartening beginning, you'll be rewarded with some happy developments. Pursey and Mrs. Storm eventually get to know the real Rachel, and they become her staunchest supporters. It takes practically the entire book for me to feel in any way attached to Hilary, but in the end, I liked her quite a bit, and I wished her honesty, straightforwardness, and certainty of conviction could have come through earlier.
Besides the "don't be prideful" lesson, we also learn, through Hilary, that talent alone is not enough to succeed. One also needs hard work and ambition. Yet, as with Mark, we also see that just because one is talented, that does not mean that one must devote one's whole life to honing that particular talent (as Posy did). The important thing is to do what makes you happy.
I thought the ending was more well-done than those of the other books, as I rather liked the final conversation between Hilary and Rachel.
After reading this book, I can't believe how much I want to say about it!
Isabelle didn't even finish this one. I was surprised because she gave 5 stars to both Ballet Shoes and Theatre Shoes, and how different could this book be? Once I started reading Dancing Shoes, however, I could see right away why she didn't like it.
On the surface, there is much about this book that is similar to the others. The main character, Rachel, is an orphan, and she and her adopted sister, Hilary, are forced to train for the stage. Hilary is naturally talented on the stage (like Pauline and Mark), but Rachel - we think - is not (like Petrova). In time, we find that even though Rachel can't dance, she can act (like Sorrel). Along the way, Rachel's cousin Dulcie learns that "pride will come before a fall" (the same lesson learned by Pauline and Miranda).
Unlike the other two books, however, this story begins with Rachel not yet orphaned. Her father died in an accident, but her mother is there to take care of her and Hilary, who was adopted by Rachel's father when her own parents died in a natural disaster. When Rachel's mother dies, we realize that poor young Hilary has lost two sets of parents! But, though Hilary is an important character in the book, it's really Rachel who is the main character. While we witness the ways in which Rachel deals with her mother's death, Hilary doesn't appear to deal with any emotions at all and just goes along with whatever is expected of her.
So, right off the bat, this book is different because the main character is trying to deal with the loss of her mother, and she feels a lot of anger. As you can imagine, it's kind of a downer. On top of that, the girls get taken in by Rachel's Aunt Cora, who is cold and not at all a sympathetic character. Because Hilary is not a "real" relation, Aunt Cora brushes her off as a second-class family member. Due to a huge misunderstanding that Rachel is unable to clear up, Aunt Cora has a completely inaccurate picture of who Rachel is and what her relationship with Hilary is like. So, for the first part of the book, the girls really had no one on their side (unlike the Fossils, who had a house full of supporters, and the Forbes children, who had Hannah and Alice).
If you can push through the disheartening beginning, you'll be rewarded with some happy developments. Pursey and Mrs. Storm eventually get to know the real Rachel, and they become her staunchest supporters. It takes practically the entire book for me to feel in any way attached to Hilary, but in the end, I liked her quite a bit, and I wished her honesty, straightforwardness, and certainty of conviction could have come through earlier.
Besides the "don't be prideful" lesson, we also learn, through Hilary, that talent alone is not enough to succeed. One also needs hard work and ambition. Yet, as with Mark, we also see that just because one is talented, that does not mean that one must devote one's whole life to honing that particular talent (as Posy did). The important thing is to do what makes you happy.
I thought the ending was more well-done than those of the other books, as I rather liked the final conversation between Hilary and Rachel.
Monday, September 2, 2013
Theater Shoes (The Shoe Books #4) by Noel Streatfeild
★★★★½
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!!! ***
I liked how nicely this book tied in with Ballet Shoes. It's not exactly a sequel, as Pauline, Petrova, and Posy are not central characters. It's more like a spin-off, with the Fossil girls - now grown up - having cameos. None of them live in London anymore, so they don't make literal appearances, but they are mentioned quite a bit.
This time, instead of being outright orphans, the three siblings - Sorrel, Mark, and Holly - are only temporarily under the guardianship of their maternal grandmother. Their mother died years ago. Their father, being in the Navy, was away at war.
The story takes place during World War II, and I frequently wondered if young readers would really understand the war references. Isabelle read the book before me, and I am sure many of the wartime details went right over her head. There is talk about rationing and black-outs, and though I tried to explain some of it to Isabelle after the fact, by the time we discussed it, it was all out of context, so I don't know if she learned much in the end.
Anyway, I really enjoyed reading about Madame again, and was pleased to see Winifred in a good place. It was fun hearing from Pauline, Petrova, and Posy, too. One should definitely read Ballet Shoes before Theater Shoes, and having read Ballet Shoes, a few of the story lines will sound familiar. In both books, the first time one of the girls gets a leading part in a production, she lets the role go to her head, acts up, and as punishment, an understudy gets to take over. There's also a big to-do about needing a new frock.
I also liked that, just as in Ballet Shoes, all the enthusiasm for show business was not shared by everyone. It's just nice to see a counterpoint so young children don't get to thinking that being star is everything. In Ballet Shoes, Petrova didn't like to perform, but then again, she didn't have much talent. This time, Mark does have quite a bit of talent, but we see that just because you are good at something doesn't mean you must do that thing as a career, even if you don't mind doing it. I'd like to think that Mark's talent doesn't just waste away, but maybe he uses it as a hobby while pursuing his real ambitions.
As with Ballet Shoes, the only real disappointment in this book was the ending. Noel Streatfeild seems to have had a way with abrupt endings. It's like she opened a scene on the very last page, but we don't get to see how that scene plays out. How does Daddy feel about his children performing? How do Daddy and Grandmother get along when they first see each other again? How does Daddy feel about Mark following in his footsteps when it means not pursuing his talent? It would have been nice if the father's return was taken just a little further, if only just through Christmas dinner, and long enough to lay out the family's plans for the immediate future.
Incidentally, Isabelle gave this book 5 stars.
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!!! ***
I liked how nicely this book tied in with Ballet Shoes. It's not exactly a sequel, as Pauline, Petrova, and Posy are not central characters. It's more like a spin-off, with the Fossil girls - now grown up - having cameos. None of them live in London anymore, so they don't make literal appearances, but they are mentioned quite a bit.
This time, instead of being outright orphans, the three siblings - Sorrel, Mark, and Holly - are only temporarily under the guardianship of their maternal grandmother. Their mother died years ago. Their father, being in the Navy, was away at war.
The story takes place during World War II, and I frequently wondered if young readers would really understand the war references. Isabelle read the book before me, and I am sure many of the wartime details went right over her head. There is talk about rationing and black-outs, and though I tried to explain some of it to Isabelle after the fact, by the time we discussed it, it was all out of context, so I don't know if she learned much in the end.
Anyway, I really enjoyed reading about Madame again, and was pleased to see Winifred in a good place. It was fun hearing from Pauline, Petrova, and Posy, too. One should definitely read Ballet Shoes before Theater Shoes, and having read Ballet Shoes, a few of the story lines will sound familiar. In both books, the first time one of the girls gets a leading part in a production, she lets the role go to her head, acts up, and as punishment, an understudy gets to take over. There's also a big to-do about needing a new frock.
I also liked that, just as in Ballet Shoes, all the enthusiasm for show business was not shared by everyone. It's just nice to see a counterpoint so young children don't get to thinking that being star is everything. In Ballet Shoes, Petrova didn't like to perform, but then again, she didn't have much talent. This time, Mark does have quite a bit of talent, but we see that just because you are good at something doesn't mean you must do that thing as a career, even if you don't mind doing it. I'd like to think that Mark's talent doesn't just waste away, but maybe he uses it as a hobby while pursuing his real ambitions.
As with Ballet Shoes, the only real disappointment in this book was the ending. Noel Streatfeild seems to have had a way with abrupt endings. It's like she opened a scene on the very last page, but we don't get to see how that scene plays out. How does Daddy feel about his children performing? How do Daddy and Grandmother get along when they first see each other again? How does Daddy feel about Mark following in his footsteps when it means not pursuing his talent? It would have been nice if the father's return was taken just a little further, if only just through Christmas dinner, and long enough to lay out the family's plans for the immediate future.
Incidentally, Isabelle gave this book 5 stars.
Labels:
book,
book: 4-and-a-half stars,
children,
series
Ballet Shoes (2007)
★★★★
Die-hard fans of the book may be disappointed with all the liberties taken by the movie. Quite a few changes were made, presumably with the intention of adding more drama and tension. While the book focused pretty much entirely on the girls, the movie made Sylvia a more central character. Madame in the book seemed rather warm, but Madame in the movie was quite stern. Still, I liked her. I'm usually a stickler for movies adhering to books, but in this case, I thought the movie version was really well-done.
The only thing I really disliked was the ending. It was too abrupt, just like the ending of the book. At the end of the movie, I felt primed to watch a new series or a sequel.
Isabelle said she liked the movie, but she liked the book better.
Die-hard fans of the book may be disappointed with all the liberties taken by the movie. Quite a few changes were made, presumably with the intention of adding more drama and tension. While the book focused pretty much entirely on the girls, the movie made Sylvia a more central character. Madame in the book seemed rather warm, but Madame in the movie was quite stern. Still, I liked her. I'm usually a stickler for movies adhering to books, but in this case, I thought the movie version was really well-done.
The only thing I really disliked was the ending. It was too abrupt, just like the ending of the book. At the end of the movie, I felt primed to watch a new series or a sequel.
Isabelle said she liked the movie, but she liked the book better.
Monday, August 26, 2013
Ballet Shoes (The Shoe Books #1) by Noel Streatfeild
★★★★½
I first heard of "the shoe books" when Meg Ryan's character mentioned them in You've Got Mail. I sort of had them in the back of my mind as an option for Isabelle, so I was pleased when she picked out this book all on her own at the library.
The whole set-up seems a bit contrived, but somehow, the author pulled it off.
I think the draw of the book is summed up in the very last line, when Petrova says, "I wonder... if other girls had to be one of us, which of us they'd choose to be?"
Would a little girl reading the book want to be Pauline, a beautiful actress with talent enough for stage and screen, but who, when it comes down to it, is not irreplaceable in her work? Someone who knows what she wants, but sacrifices it for the sake of her sister? (Granted, her sacrifice comes with the kind of opportunity dreams are made of, and you get the feeling she's going to be just fine.)
Or, would a reader choose to be Posy, a ballet prodigy whose talent was so remarkable that self-aggrandizing statements did not even come across as conceitedness because they were actually true? (I was intrigued by Petrova's ability to make that observation without quite being able to explain it, on page 140 of my paperback edition.)
Or, would a reader more often identify with Petrova, perhaps not with her fascination of motorcars and aeroplanes, but with her struggle to do what was expected of her, even though it did not interest her, while putting off her own dreams?
For me, I liked Petrova best. She did what she had to do to help her family, and even though she disliked it, she diligently did her work so that she became "technically one of the most proficient pupils in her class" (page 143). Still, she never lost sight of her true passions, and she optimistically held onto the possibility that one day she could do what she wanted for herself. Also, I liked that Petrova was smart and thoughtful and showed concern for others.
Throughout the book, I did wonder if - despite all the passages about hard work and long hours of practice - it might be glorifying show business? Petrova certainly provided a counterpoint to Pauline and Posy's talents and successes, but was it enough to let readers know that being a star isn't everything? I found it interesting, then, when Pauline said, towards the end of the book, "Film stars and dancers are nice things to be, but they aren't important." (page 231)
I liked that the girls were not perfect angels, and when they seriously misbehaved, they got dressed down for it. I also thought Pauline and Petrova were good role models in that they shared what little money they earned, and after putting some into savings, they were adamant about using what was left to help out with household expenses.
I wasn't sure if I wanted to give this book 4 or 5 stars, which is why I settled on 4 1/2 stars. It didn't jump out at me as a 5-star book, and yet, I really couldn't think of a good reason why it shouldn't be. Maybe I hoped the ending would be a bit less abrupt - everything was wrapped up nicely, but it was done awfully quick.
As it happened, Isabelle read this book and the first few Betsy-Tacy books around the same time. She gave the Betsy-Tacy books 4 stars, and Ballet Shoes 5 stars. But why? Is it because the girls in Ballet Shoes have special talents? Does she find the show business aspect fascinating? Is it because Ballet Shoes is more contemporary? More exciting? Or simply because the Fossil sisters are older than Betsy and Tacy so far in the books we've read? I don't know! It's interesting to see Isabelle's preferences and wonder what drives them.
I first heard of "the shoe books" when Meg Ryan's character mentioned them in You've Got Mail. I sort of had them in the back of my mind as an option for Isabelle, so I was pleased when she picked out this book all on her own at the library.
The whole set-up seems a bit contrived, but somehow, the author pulled it off.
I think the draw of the book is summed up in the very last line, when Petrova says, "I wonder... if other girls had to be one of us, which of us they'd choose to be?"
Would a little girl reading the book want to be Pauline, a beautiful actress with talent enough for stage and screen, but who, when it comes down to it, is not irreplaceable in her work? Someone who knows what she wants, but sacrifices it for the sake of her sister? (Granted, her sacrifice comes with the kind of opportunity dreams are made of, and you get the feeling she's going to be just fine.)
Or, would a reader choose to be Posy, a ballet prodigy whose talent was so remarkable that self-aggrandizing statements did not even come across as conceitedness because they were actually true? (I was intrigued by Petrova's ability to make that observation without quite being able to explain it, on page 140 of my paperback edition.)
Or, would a reader more often identify with Petrova, perhaps not with her fascination of motorcars and aeroplanes, but with her struggle to do what was expected of her, even though it did not interest her, while putting off her own dreams?
For me, I liked Petrova best. She did what she had to do to help her family, and even though she disliked it, she diligently did her work so that she became "technically one of the most proficient pupils in her class" (page 143). Still, she never lost sight of her true passions, and she optimistically held onto the possibility that one day she could do what she wanted for herself. Also, I liked that Petrova was smart and thoughtful and showed concern for others.
Throughout the book, I did wonder if - despite all the passages about hard work and long hours of practice - it might be glorifying show business? Petrova certainly provided a counterpoint to Pauline and Posy's talents and successes, but was it enough to let readers know that being a star isn't everything? I found it interesting, then, when Pauline said, towards the end of the book, "Film stars and dancers are nice things to be, but they aren't important." (page 231)
I liked that the girls were not perfect angels, and when they seriously misbehaved, they got dressed down for it. I also thought Pauline and Petrova were good role models in that they shared what little money they earned, and after putting some into savings, they were adamant about using what was left to help out with household expenses.
I wasn't sure if I wanted to give this book 4 or 5 stars, which is why I settled on 4 1/2 stars. It didn't jump out at me as a 5-star book, and yet, I really couldn't think of a good reason why it shouldn't be. Maybe I hoped the ending would be a bit less abrupt - everything was wrapped up nicely, but it was done awfully quick.
As it happened, Isabelle read this book and the first few Betsy-Tacy books around the same time. She gave the Betsy-Tacy books 4 stars, and Ballet Shoes 5 stars. But why? Is it because the girls in Ballet Shoes have special talents? Does she find the show business aspect fascinating? Is it because Ballet Shoes is more contemporary? More exciting? Or simply because the Fossil sisters are older than Betsy and Tacy so far in the books we've read? I don't know! It's interesting to see Isabelle's preferences and wonder what drives them.
Labels:
book,
book: 4-and-a-half stars,
children,
series
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Betsy and Tacy Go Over the Big Hill (Betsy-Tacy #3) by Maud Hart Lovelace
★★★★½
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
Isabelle continues to give each Betsy-Tacy book 4 stars. She can't really articulate, and I can't really figure out, why 4 and not 5.
I am REALLY glad I read the first few chapters of this book with Isabelle. Early on, the three girls are talking about a boy who is "horrid" because he called a Syrian a "dago". To be honest, I had to look up the word. Apparently, it is an ethnic slur for a person from Italy, Spain, or Portugal. (So, actually, the boy isn't even using the word correctly!) I'm sure the word probably wasn't as taboo when the book was written, but we ended up with an unexpected learning moment. I brought to Isabelle's attention a previous unexpected learning moment we had had, when Ken and Isabelle read Little Town on the Prairie together and we had a bit of a discussion about the use of the word "darkie". In this case, it is clear that the word "dago" is meant to be derogatory, and the girls seem to know it's a bad word, so it's not exactly the same as the Little Town example. But, it was similar in that the book introduced an offensive word that I would not have chosen to teach my child, and I wanted to make clear that these days, it is not at all acceptable to use such a word.
So, overlooking the bad word (which is basically why I didn't give this book 5 stars), most of the rest of book was as delightful as the previous two books. I found it particularly amusing that even before there were boy bands and movie stars, little girls always had it in them to create fan clubs and crush on celebrities!
There is an incident of truly malicious bullying, and I actually thought it was very well-written. Though I'm not sure it's wise to put yourself physically in harm's way, the girls certainly did the right thing by trying to help, and I like the anti-bullying message that young readers can take away.
I was also impressed with the way the book handled Little Syria. The author did a great job showing how the Syrian immigrants were different, but that "different" does not at all mean "bad", and in fact, the girls found it fascinating and fun to meet new people and learn new things. Especially considering that the book was written in 1942, I liked the positive representation of immigrants and a foreign culture.
It was interesting to come across the term "Mohammedans". It was another learning opportunity, and I talked with Isabelle a bit about Islam and how we now call followers of Islam "Muslims".
I thought the big "quarrel" was a true-to-life depiction of the feelings and behaviors commonly involved in a quarrel among girls, especially sisters. I even felt a bit of apprehension, really wanting the girls to work everything out! Happily, the resolution was beautifully executed.
The book ends with a heavy dose of patriotism, and young readers might realize that being American shouldn't be taken for granted. Others - particularly immigrants - consider it an honor just to be an American! In that respect, I was reminded of In the Year of the Boar and Jackie Robinson, another great read.
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
Isabelle continues to give each Betsy-Tacy book 4 stars. She can't really articulate, and I can't really figure out, why 4 and not 5.
I am REALLY glad I read the first few chapters of this book with Isabelle. Early on, the three girls are talking about a boy who is "horrid" because he called a Syrian a "dago". To be honest, I had to look up the word. Apparently, it is an ethnic slur for a person from Italy, Spain, or Portugal. (So, actually, the boy isn't even using the word correctly!) I'm sure the word probably wasn't as taboo when the book was written, but we ended up with an unexpected learning moment. I brought to Isabelle's attention a previous unexpected learning moment we had had, when Ken and Isabelle read Little Town on the Prairie together and we had a bit of a discussion about the use of the word "darkie". In this case, it is clear that the word "dago" is meant to be derogatory, and the girls seem to know it's a bad word, so it's not exactly the same as the Little Town example. But, it was similar in that the book introduced an offensive word that I would not have chosen to teach my child, and I wanted to make clear that these days, it is not at all acceptable to use such a word.
So, overlooking the bad word (which is basically why I didn't give this book 5 stars), most of the rest of book was as delightful as the previous two books. I found it particularly amusing that even before there were boy bands and movie stars, little girls always had it in them to create fan clubs and crush on celebrities!
There is an incident of truly malicious bullying, and I actually thought it was very well-written. Though I'm not sure it's wise to put yourself physically in harm's way, the girls certainly did the right thing by trying to help, and I like the anti-bullying message that young readers can take away.
I was also impressed with the way the book handled Little Syria. The author did a great job showing how the Syrian immigrants were different, but that "different" does not at all mean "bad", and in fact, the girls found it fascinating and fun to meet new people and learn new things. Especially considering that the book was written in 1942, I liked the positive representation of immigrants and a foreign culture.
It was interesting to come across the term "Mohammedans". It was another learning opportunity, and I talked with Isabelle a bit about Islam and how we now call followers of Islam "Muslims".
I thought the big "quarrel" was a true-to-life depiction of the feelings and behaviors commonly involved in a quarrel among girls, especially sisters. I even felt a bit of apprehension, really wanting the girls to work everything out! Happily, the resolution was beautifully executed.
The book ends with a heavy dose of patriotism, and young readers might realize that being American shouldn't be taken for granted. Others - particularly immigrants - consider it an honor just to be an American! In that respect, I was reminded of In the Year of the Boar and Jackie Robinson, another great read.
Labels:
book,
book: 4-and-a-half stars,
children,
multicultural,
series
Monday, August 12, 2013
The Ragnarök Conspiracy by Erec Stebbins
★★★½
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
I picked this book off our home bookshelf. I don't usually read thrillers - so I am certainly not the target audience for this book - but since it was written by a childhood friend of Ken's, I figured I'd give it a shot.
Mostly, reading this book felt just like watching an action movie. Everything that transpired was easily envisioned on a big screen, and the book even included what I consider the superfluous yet obligatory romance between the male lead and a supporting female character.
Just like a Hollywood movie, we are treated to a number of clichés. The investigative team included such stereotypical characters as an imposing ex-Marine, a computer science nerd, and a flaky yet intuitively intelligent woman. The evil mastermind is wealthy, powerful, and polished. The romance is revealed in a dramatic rain-soaked scene, and important people who want things done want them done "yesterday!".
I was occasionally put off by what seemed like excessive explanation. For example, when Jordan tries to barricade himself into a room, he "grabbed several crowbars and wedged them inside the metal handle and across the divider beside the door. It worked like a barricade in an old castle - as the door was pushed forward (or pulled from the outside), the bars caught on the metal handle and the wall, preventing further movement." (Pg. 324) Seems like the author could have simply written, "He barred the door with several crowbars."
At other times, I found myself confused about the lack of explanation. When Jordan is working a mission, he finds himself betrayed, the other person screaming, "You think I have no way to send message?" (Pg. 160) But, how did the guy send a message? Maybe I missed it, but when every other development in the book was so well-explained, it was all that much harder to blindly accept a gap in the chain without knowing how it got there. Also, I never did understand why all the higher-ups were so slow to accept the evidence that seemed to point pretty obviously to Savas's conclusions. With all the evidence, the push-back Savas received seemed like manufactured drama.
Most disappointing, though, was the de-evolution of Rebecca Cohen. She started out as the sharpest, most intelligent member of the team. But, once she was in a relationship with Savas, she became a helpless victim, internally calling out, "John, please, help me..." (Pg. 289) rather than trying to help herself in some way. In the dramatic climax full of action, every man had an active role to play, except Rebecca, who is only there to be saved.
So, all that aside, I'm still giving this book an "I like it" rating because, well, I did enjoy reading it. It's a good read. It was well-paced with developments that continuously drove the plot forward. There is a whole slew of interesting, named characters who play only supporting or minor roles at best; that kind of over-complication usually annoys me, but in this case, I feel the author did a really good job introducing characters, setting up their contexts, and integrating them into the story. Most chapters were relatively short, which made for good reading for me because, with two small children, I can usually only read for 5-20 minutes at a time. And, given the complexities of religion and Savas's personal history with it, I liked that his struggle with religion was not blithely reconciled in the end.
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***
I picked this book off our home bookshelf. I don't usually read thrillers - so I am certainly not the target audience for this book - but since it was written by a childhood friend of Ken's, I figured I'd give it a shot.
Mostly, reading this book felt just like watching an action movie. Everything that transpired was easily envisioned on a big screen, and the book even included what I consider the superfluous yet obligatory romance between the male lead and a supporting female character.
Just like a Hollywood movie, we are treated to a number of clichés. The investigative team included such stereotypical characters as an imposing ex-Marine, a computer science nerd, and a flaky yet intuitively intelligent woman. The evil mastermind is wealthy, powerful, and polished. The romance is revealed in a dramatic rain-soaked scene, and important people who want things done want them done "yesterday!".
I was occasionally put off by what seemed like excessive explanation. For example, when Jordan tries to barricade himself into a room, he "grabbed several crowbars and wedged them inside the metal handle and across the divider beside the door. It worked like a barricade in an old castle - as the door was pushed forward (or pulled from the outside), the bars caught on the metal handle and the wall, preventing further movement." (Pg. 324) Seems like the author could have simply written, "He barred the door with several crowbars."
At other times, I found myself confused about the lack of explanation. When Jordan is working a mission, he finds himself betrayed, the other person screaming, "You think I have no way to send message?" (Pg. 160) But, how did the guy send a message? Maybe I missed it, but when every other development in the book was so well-explained, it was all that much harder to blindly accept a gap in the chain without knowing how it got there. Also, I never did understand why all the higher-ups were so slow to accept the evidence that seemed to point pretty obviously to Savas's conclusions. With all the evidence, the push-back Savas received seemed like manufactured drama.
Most disappointing, though, was the de-evolution of Rebecca Cohen. She started out as the sharpest, most intelligent member of the team. But, once she was in a relationship with Savas, she became a helpless victim, internally calling out, "John, please, help me..." (Pg. 289) rather than trying to help herself in some way. In the dramatic climax full of action, every man had an active role to play, except Rebecca, who is only there to be saved.
So, all that aside, I'm still giving this book an "I like it" rating because, well, I did enjoy reading it. It's a good read. It was well-paced with developments that continuously drove the plot forward. There is a whole slew of interesting, named characters who play only supporting or minor roles at best; that kind of over-complication usually annoys me, but in this case, I feel the author did a really good job introducing characters, setting up their contexts, and integrating them into the story. Most chapters were relatively short, which made for good reading for me because, with two small children, I can usually only read for 5-20 minutes at a time. And, given the complexities of religion and Savas's personal history with it, I liked that his struggle with religion was not blithely reconciled in the end.
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Betsy-Tacy and Tib (Betsy-Tacy #2) by Maud Hart Lovelace
★★★★
A nice follow-up to Betsy-Tacy, though a bit less believable.
In the beginning, the author acknowledges that many grown-ups think, "Two little girls often do play nicely, but just let a third one come around... then the trouble begins!" Yet, Betsy, Tacy, and Tib never quarrel, and it's not exactly clear why not, except that they must be the three most good-natured girls ever to live in the same neighborhood!
Two years have passed since the girls first met, and they are now 8 years old. Isabelle will be 8 next month, so it was fun to read this book together about girls who are just her age. But while we did enjoy the stories and found them amusing, they just didn't sound like adventures Isabelle and her friends would have. Betsy, Tacy, and Tib's antics seemed more like activities that today's 5- or 6-year-olds might engage in. I don't know if kids today are exposed to more knowledge earlier, and so they are truly less innocent at younger ages? Whatever the case, whenever I asked Isabelle if she might have fun doing something similar to what we were reading about, she always answered, "No! It's just a story, it's all made up." She definitely "knows better" than to try to fly or to cut anyone's hair.
Anyway. As with the first book, I really liked the way this book takes you back in time. Diphtheria is not uncommon, and Aunt Dolly has "morning dresses" and "afternoon dresses".
Definitely looking forward to reading the next book in the series.
A nice follow-up to Betsy-Tacy, though a bit less believable.
In the beginning, the author acknowledges that many grown-ups think, "Two little girls often do play nicely, but just let a third one come around... then the trouble begins!" Yet, Betsy, Tacy, and Tib never quarrel, and it's not exactly clear why not, except that they must be the three most good-natured girls ever to live in the same neighborhood!
Two years have passed since the girls first met, and they are now 8 years old. Isabelle will be 8 next month, so it was fun to read this book together about girls who are just her age. But while we did enjoy the stories and found them amusing, they just didn't sound like adventures Isabelle and her friends would have. Betsy, Tacy, and Tib's antics seemed more like activities that today's 5- or 6-year-olds might engage in. I don't know if kids today are exposed to more knowledge earlier, and so they are truly less innocent at younger ages? Whatever the case, whenever I asked Isabelle if she might have fun doing something similar to what we were reading about, she always answered, "No! It's just a story, it's all made up." She definitely "knows better" than to try to fly or to cut anyone's hair.
Anyway. As with the first book, I really liked the way this book takes you back in time. Diphtheria is not uncommon, and Aunt Dolly has "morning dresses" and "afternoon dresses".
Definitely looking forward to reading the next book in the series.
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Betsy-Tacy (Betsy-Tacy #1) by Maud Hart Lovelace
★★★★★
A very sweet story of two little girls growing up in a simpler time. In this day and age of social media and online games, it was refreshingly quaint to read about a time when ladies went calling, milk was delivered in horse-drawn wagons, and children's play was limited only by the scope of their own imaginations. Betsy and Tacy, both five years old, play games and explore their neighborhood with their mothers' permission but without adult supervision.
The author takes Betsy and Tacy through several big life events, including the first day of school, the birth of a baby sister, and even the death of a baby sister. The situations are not treated lightly, but they convey the innocence of a child's perspective. I love that the girls show compassion and take care of each other in difficult times.
I also like that young children reading this book will probably encounter new vocabulary, even if the reading level is appropriate. First published in 1940 and presumably set it in the late 1800's or early 1900's, many frequently used words from that time are now less common. When the Kelly family moves in, Betsy sees a moving "dray", not a moving truck, and their houses have "parlors", not living rooms or family rooms.
The edition I read included some fun facts about the author and where she got her inspiration for writing the book, plus a delightful little map of the girls' neighborhood.
I think this will be a fun series to follow, and I'm looking forward to the next book.
Isabelle read this book on her own and gave it 4 stars. I couldn't get her to elaborate on why 4 and not 5. She never seems to want to talk about books that she reads on her own, and she gets annoyed when I ask her questions. Maybe I'll see if she wants to read the next one together.
A very sweet story of two little girls growing up in a simpler time. In this day and age of social media and online games, it was refreshingly quaint to read about a time when ladies went calling, milk was delivered in horse-drawn wagons, and children's play was limited only by the scope of their own imaginations. Betsy and Tacy, both five years old, play games and explore their neighborhood with their mothers' permission but without adult supervision.
The author takes Betsy and Tacy through several big life events, including the first day of school, the birth of a baby sister, and even the death of a baby sister. The situations are not treated lightly, but they convey the innocence of a child's perspective. I love that the girls show compassion and take care of each other in difficult times.
I also like that young children reading this book will probably encounter new vocabulary, even if the reading level is appropriate. First published in 1940 and presumably set it in the late 1800's or early 1900's, many frequently used words from that time are now less common. When the Kelly family moves in, Betsy sees a moving "dray", not a moving truck, and their houses have "parlors", not living rooms or family rooms.
The edition I read included some fun facts about the author and where she got her inspiration for writing the book, plus a delightful little map of the girls' neighborhood.
I think this will be a fun series to follow, and I'm looking forward to the next book.
Isabelle read this book on her own and gave it 4 stars. I couldn't get her to elaborate on why 4 and not 5. She never seems to want to talk about books that she reads on her own, and she gets annoyed when I ask her questions. Maybe I'll see if she wants to read the next one together.
Thursday, July 11, 2013
Framingham Beer Works - Framingham, MA
★★★★★
My kids love this place!
You might not expect it from a microbrewery, but this restaurant is super kid-friendly. We have eaten here twice so far, the first time arriving on the late side for lunch, and the second time arriving on the early side. Both times we were seated in a booth, which was great for the kids. The kids menu has all the staples for my kids - hot dog, hamburger, mac 'n cheese, pizza - and both kids really like the different root beers as well.
This restaurant is close enough - and well-liked enough by the kids - that we might be eating here relatively often. I think I'll try to order something different every time. So far I've had the Charlestown Burger and the Fish 'n Chips, both of which I thoroughly enjoyed.
The real reason I'm giving this restaurant 5 stars, though, is because of how allergy-aware they are. When Sebastien mentioned his allergies, the waiter was careful to make note of each allergen. One time, both Isabelle and Sebastien ordered the mac 'n cheese, and when the food came out, the server specifically asked who had the allergies so she could give that person a particular plate. Even though both plates looked exactly the same, presumably one had been served up to minimize cross-contamination. And, when the bill came, it included an all-caps warning about allergies, presumably because the same ticket was used in the kitchen.
My kids love this place!
You might not expect it from a microbrewery, but this restaurant is super kid-friendly. We have eaten here twice so far, the first time arriving on the late side for lunch, and the second time arriving on the early side. Both times we were seated in a booth, which was great for the kids. The kids menu has all the staples for my kids - hot dog, hamburger, mac 'n cheese, pizza - and both kids really like the different root beers as well.
This restaurant is close enough - and well-liked enough by the kids - that we might be eating here relatively often. I think I'll try to order something different every time. So far I've had the Charlestown Burger and the Fish 'n Chips, both of which I thoroughly enjoyed.
The real reason I'm giving this restaurant 5 stars, though, is because of how allergy-aware they are. When Sebastien mentioned his allergies, the waiter was careful to make note of each allergen. One time, both Isabelle and Sebastien ordered the mac 'n cheese, and when the food came out, the server specifically asked who had the allergies so she could give that person a particular plate. Even though both plates looked exactly the same, presumably one had been served up to minimize cross-contamination. And, when the bill came, it included an all-caps warning about allergies, presumably because the same ticket was used in the kitchen.
Jordan's Restaurant - Bar Harbor, ME
★★★
We arrived on a Saturday morning around 9 or 9:30 AM, and only had a brief wait before being seated, though we did have to break into two groups to be seated in two booths. The booths were close to each other, in the same area of the restaurant, but not adjacent.
Fast, friendly, very casual service.
Isabelle's French toast was delicious, and Sebastien's yogurt with fresh fruit was large and generously portioned. But the wild blueberry muffins were not as great as I had expected them to be, and my omelette - though well made - was kind of bland. I think maybe they used mild cheddar cheese, which hardly tasted like anything at all to me, since I am used to eating extra sharp cheddar at home.
We arrived on a Saturday morning around 9 or 9:30 AM, and only had a brief wait before being seated, though we did have to break into two groups to be seated in two booths. The booths were close to each other, in the same area of the restaurant, but not adjacent.
Fast, friendly, very casual service.
Isabelle's French toast was delicious, and Sebastien's yogurt with fresh fruit was large and generously portioned. But the wild blueberry muffins were not as great as I had expected them to be, and my omelette - though well made - was kind of bland. I think maybe they used mild cheddar cheese, which hardly tasted like anything at all to me, since I am used to eating extra sharp cheddar at home.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Beal's Lobster Pier - Southwest Harbor, ME
★★★½
A lobster pound - where you pick a lobster from a tank and pay by the pound. This was the only lobster pound I ate at, so I can't compare it to others...
The menu is both limited and extensive: limited because the only non-fried foods available were lobsters, clams, and corn, but extensive because they offered a wide variety of fried foods (including chicken tenders and fries), plus hot dogs and hamburgers.
Super kid-friendly because of the menu, plus you eat outdoors at picnic tables, which means the kids don't have to be well-contained in their seats and can run around.
No lobster crackers or wet naps, but they do have a hand washing station. Great view of southwest harbor.
A lobster pound - where you pick a lobster from a tank and pay by the pound. This was the only lobster pound I ate at, so I can't compare it to others...
The menu is both limited and extensive: limited because the only non-fried foods available were lobsters, clams, and corn, but extensive because they offered a wide variety of fried foods (including chicken tenders and fries), plus hot dogs and hamburgers.
Super kid-friendly because of the menu, plus you eat outdoors at picnic tables, which means the kids don't have to be well-contained in their seats and can run around.
No lobster crackers or wet naps, but they do have a hand washing station. Great view of southwest harbor.
The Jordan Pond House Restaurant - Acadia National Park, ME
★★★★
After battling the overflowing parking lot on a super hot day, we were dismayed to find out that our 3 PM reservation for 10 people was lost! Completely non-existent! Thankfully, the hostess - who remained calm and composed while juggling the high demands of the crowd that day - handled the situation wonderfully. She put us into the pager line just as if we did have reservations, and we ended up getting a perfect outdoor table with a gorgeous view of the pond at pretty much our original reservation time.
We all had desserts, most of us opting for the popovers a la mode. Yum! Even Sebastien had ice cream because it's made by the restaurant, and while they do have one flavor with Heath Bar (which contains almonds), the super friendly waitress said that because they serve 2,000 people a day, they are well-versed in allergies, and she assured us they could serve Sebastien safe, un-cross-contaminated vanilla ice cream.
The unsweetened lemonade came with sugar water. I put just enough in for my drink to be satisfyingly refreshing, but there just wasn't enough sugar water to satisfy the kids. I'm sure the waitress would have brought more if we asked, but we didn't bother asking.
After battling the overflowing parking lot on a super hot day, we were dismayed to find out that our 3 PM reservation for 10 people was lost! Completely non-existent! Thankfully, the hostess - who remained calm and composed while juggling the high demands of the crowd that day - handled the situation wonderfully. She put us into the pager line just as if we did have reservations, and we ended up getting a perfect outdoor table with a gorgeous view of the pond at pretty much our original reservation time.
We all had desserts, most of us opting for the popovers a la mode. Yum! Even Sebastien had ice cream because it's made by the restaurant, and while they do have one flavor with Heath Bar (which contains almonds), the super friendly waitress said that because they serve 2,000 people a day, they are well-versed in allergies, and she assured us they could serve Sebastien safe, un-cross-contaminated vanilla ice cream.
The unsweetened lemonade came with sugar water. I put just enough in for my drink to be satisfyingly refreshing, but there just wasn't enough sugar water to satisfy the kids. I'm sure the waitress would have brought more if we asked, but we didn't bother asking.
Portside Grill - Bar Harbor, ME
★★★★
Our party of 10 arrived around 6 PM on a Thursday evening, and they were able to seat us immediately.
Friendly service. When I mentioned Sebastien's allergies and asked about the bread, the waitress seemed knowledgeable and advised against Sebastien eating it.
My steamers appetizer was big and plentiful, and I loved my fish and chips entree - lightly battered, well-cooked. The watermelon cocktail, however, was not as interesting as it sounded on paper. The kids meals must have been good because both my kids polished off their plates - Sebastien ate all his mac 'n cheese, and Isabelle ate a whole hamburger.
Our party of 10 arrived around 6 PM on a Thursday evening, and they were able to seat us immediately.
Friendly service. When I mentioned Sebastien's allergies and asked about the bread, the waitress seemed knowledgeable and advised against Sebastien eating it.
My steamers appetizer was big and plentiful, and I loved my fish and chips entree - lightly battered, well-cooked. The watermelon cocktail, however, was not as interesting as it sounded on paper. The kids meals must have been good because both my kids polished off their plates - Sebastien ate all his mac 'n cheese, and Isabelle ate a whole hamburger.
Geddy's - Bar Harbor, ME
★★★
Fun atmosphere with lots of interesting things on the walls, like old license plates from around the country. Wide menu selection, including a kid's menu. We arrived around 6 PM on a Wednesday night, and our party of 10 got seated immediately at a large corner booth where we didn't have to worry about the kids bothering other diners.
I mentioned Sebastien's food allergies, and the waitress did not seem very interested or concerned.
As for the food... My lobster bisque was too buttery, and it didn't have as much lobster as I had hoped it would. My fried clams had too much batter. On the plus side, the kids' drinks came with small plastic fish toys, and their entrees came on souvenir frisbees - a great idea, not withstanding the disappointment my daughter experienced because she didn't like the color of her frisbee.
Fun atmosphere with lots of interesting things on the walls, like old license plates from around the country. Wide menu selection, including a kid's menu. We arrived around 6 PM on a Wednesday night, and our party of 10 got seated immediately at a large corner booth where we didn't have to worry about the kids bothering other diners.
I mentioned Sebastien's food allergies, and the waitress did not seem very interested or concerned.
As for the food... My lobster bisque was too buttery, and it didn't have as much lobster as I had hoped it would. My fried clams had too much batter. On the plus side, the kids' drinks came with small plastic fish toys, and their entrees came on souvenir frisbees - a great idea, not withstanding the disappointment my daughter experienced because she didn't like the color of her frisbee.
Saving Sight: An Eye Surgeon's Look at Life Behind the Mask and the Heroes Who Changed the Way We See by Andrew Lam
★★★★
When my daughter was 5, she had a frightening incident involving a foreign object in her eye. We had no idea what it was, but every effort to flush it out with water failed. Clearly in pain, she cried and repeated, "I can't see! It hurts!" I was scared out of my mind, afraid she'd have permanent eye damage. I called the doctor's office in tears, and in the end, a pediatric ophthalmologist used specialized equipment to identify and remove a TINY, thin, clear piece of plastic.
In Saving Sight, Andrew Lam writes about eye injuries that are 1,000 times worse than what my daughter experienced.
This book has two main focuses, both of which made for really fascinating and compelling reading: the author's personal experiences with various types of eye issues he has encountered with his patients, and the individuals who made the amazing advances in technology and medicine that help cure those eye conditions.
I appreciated the author's frank honesty as he recounted the care he gave his patients. He was at times doubtful and uncertain, but he utilized his training and found solutions to whatever problems were put in front of him. In this line of work, in which the doctor is literally giving people the gift of sight - which, in turn, is sometimes equivalent to the gift of life itself - one might imagine that such a doctor would develop a kind of God complex. But, Dr. Lam comes across as humble and dedicated, with a bedside manner that I wish my doctors had.
The stories behind the major innovations in eye care were equally interesting. Most of us probably don't give a second thought to the specialized equipment, techniques, and drugs used to examine, improve, and maintain our eye sight (like LASIK) or to cope with loss of sight (like braille). But, wow! These inventions and advancements - and the people behind them - have had and continue to have such an incredibly significant impact on so many people's lives that I really think Dr. Lam is doing the world a service by telling their stories. As a sort of added bonus, many of the stories have a World War II connection that any history buff would be likely to appreciate. (It's not surprising that the author received his undergraduate degree in History, as noted in the "About the Author" section.)
If you're very squeamish, it may be worth noting that some of the information outlining medical procedures performed on the eyes is explicit and detailed. Also, the book describes medical research performed on animals, which may not be agreeable to everyone (though hopefully everyone would be able to see the important scientific value of such research). Even Monsanto, the giant of recent GMO (genetically modified organisms) backlash, makes a cameo in a positive light.
While thoroughly appreciating all that I read in this book, I sometimes wondered if the one book tried to be too many things all at once. As a whole, the book is readable and approachable, though the writing style jumps around between informal first-person narrative (like a memoir), third-person historical fiction, and straight-up non-fiction. Tangential commentary popped up here and there about different aspects of the American medical system, like the medicolegal climate and flaws in the healthcare system. Though still interesting to read, these observations were like side discussions relative to the main ideas of the book.
Finally, as a person with a close family member with Parkinson's Disease, I sometimes feel it is my responsibility to help accurately spread Parkinson's awareness. On page 51 of the paperback version, Dr. Irving S. Cooper is said to have "developed a freezing probe...to cure Parkinson's disease." Many people might just gloss over the sentence, but in this case, I am a stickler for word choice. While Parkinson's Disease can be "managed" with medicine and surgery, there is no actual cure yet - though many dedicated people are working towards finding one. The U.S. National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health describes Dr. Cooper this way: "He developed several novel techniques for the surgical management of Parkinson's disease," and his work helped to "alleviate the movement disorders associated with Parkinson's disease." (Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/98...)
Overall, a really interesting read that I think any person who has ever seen an eye doctor would appreciate. An inspirational book that I will keep on my bookshelf and encourage my children to read when they are older.
When my daughter was 5, she had a frightening incident involving a foreign object in her eye. We had no idea what it was, but every effort to flush it out with water failed. Clearly in pain, she cried and repeated, "I can't see! It hurts!" I was scared out of my mind, afraid she'd have permanent eye damage. I called the doctor's office in tears, and in the end, a pediatric ophthalmologist used specialized equipment to identify and remove a TINY, thin, clear piece of plastic.
In Saving Sight, Andrew Lam writes about eye injuries that are 1,000 times worse than what my daughter experienced.
This book has two main focuses, both of which made for really fascinating and compelling reading: the author's personal experiences with various types of eye issues he has encountered with his patients, and the individuals who made the amazing advances in technology and medicine that help cure those eye conditions.
I appreciated the author's frank honesty as he recounted the care he gave his patients. He was at times doubtful and uncertain, but he utilized his training and found solutions to whatever problems were put in front of him. In this line of work, in which the doctor is literally giving people the gift of sight - which, in turn, is sometimes equivalent to the gift of life itself - one might imagine that such a doctor would develop a kind of God complex. But, Dr. Lam comes across as humble and dedicated, with a bedside manner that I wish my doctors had.
The stories behind the major innovations in eye care were equally interesting. Most of us probably don't give a second thought to the specialized equipment, techniques, and drugs used to examine, improve, and maintain our eye sight (like LASIK) or to cope with loss of sight (like braille). But, wow! These inventions and advancements - and the people behind them - have had and continue to have such an incredibly significant impact on so many people's lives that I really think Dr. Lam is doing the world a service by telling their stories. As a sort of added bonus, many of the stories have a World War II connection that any history buff would be likely to appreciate. (It's not surprising that the author received his undergraduate degree in History, as noted in the "About the Author" section.)
If you're very squeamish, it may be worth noting that some of the information outlining medical procedures performed on the eyes is explicit and detailed. Also, the book describes medical research performed on animals, which may not be agreeable to everyone (though hopefully everyone would be able to see the important scientific value of such research). Even Monsanto, the giant of recent GMO (genetically modified organisms) backlash, makes a cameo in a positive light.
While thoroughly appreciating all that I read in this book, I sometimes wondered if the one book tried to be too many things all at once. As a whole, the book is readable and approachable, though the writing style jumps around between informal first-person narrative (like a memoir), third-person historical fiction, and straight-up non-fiction. Tangential commentary popped up here and there about different aspects of the American medical system, like the medicolegal climate and flaws in the healthcare system. Though still interesting to read, these observations were like side discussions relative to the main ideas of the book.
Finally, as a person with a close family member with Parkinson's Disease, I sometimes feel it is my responsibility to help accurately spread Parkinson's awareness. On page 51 of the paperback version, Dr. Irving S. Cooper is said to have "developed a freezing probe...to cure Parkinson's disease." Many people might just gloss over the sentence, but in this case, I am a stickler for word choice. While Parkinson's Disease can be "managed" with medicine and surgery, there is no actual cure yet - though many dedicated people are working towards finding one. The U.S. National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health describes Dr. Cooper this way: "He developed several novel techniques for the surgical management of Parkinson's disease," and his work helped to "alleviate the movement disorders associated with Parkinson's disease." (Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/98...)
Overall, a really interesting read that I think any person who has ever seen an eye doctor would appreciate. An inspirational book that I will keep on my bookshelf and encourage my children to read when they are older.
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Mountain Top Mystery (The Boxcar Children #9) by Gertrude Chandler Warner
★★★
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers! ***
Gertrude Chandler Warner seems to have a special interest in Native American Indians... This book is somewhat reminiscent of The Yellow House Mystery in that, once again, the children meet an isolated Indian woman who makes baskets.
On the one hand, this story had a lot of interesting pieces - I liked the mountain setting and the Indian boy - but on the other hand, the mystery itself was pretty contrived, requiring quite a bit of set-up. I also wasn't really fond of the way Grandfather, within minutes of meeting the Indian woman, decides to help her by buying an entire forest. The message seems to be, "Money solves all problems, it's a good thing I have so much of it!" I was also bothered by the way the rangers brought in and interrogated the Indian boy simply because he was not from the area. I know they were just trying to help, but it seemed more like they were taking him into custody, even though he hadn't done anything wrong.
One other interesting thing of note: In this book, for the first time that I can tell, the kids don't drink milk - they drink Coke!
*** Warning: This review contains spoilers! ***
Gertrude Chandler Warner seems to have a special interest in Native American Indians... This book is somewhat reminiscent of The Yellow House Mystery in that, once again, the children meet an isolated Indian woman who makes baskets.
On the one hand, this story had a lot of interesting pieces - I liked the mountain setting and the Indian boy - but on the other hand, the mystery itself was pretty contrived, requiring quite a bit of set-up. I also wasn't really fond of the way Grandfather, within minutes of meeting the Indian woman, decides to help her by buying an entire forest. The message seems to be, "Money solves all problems, it's a good thing I have so much of it!" I was also bothered by the way the rangers brought in and interrogated the Indian boy simply because he was not from the area. I know they were just trying to help, but it seemed more like they were taking him into custody, even though he hadn't done anything wrong.
One other interesting thing of note: In this book, for the first time that I can tell, the kids don't drink milk - they drink Coke!
Friday, June 14, 2013
Benny Uncovers a Mystery (The Boxcar Children #19) by Gertrude Chandler Warner
★★★★
Even though I still have more Boxcar Children books to read (I plan to read all 19 of the original series), I actually feel a bit sad knowing that this is the last book of the series written by Gertrude Chandler Warner.
I haven't read all the books in the series yet, but this book differs from many of the others in that not all of the children are present for the mystery. Some of the earlier books do focus more on Benny, but Henry and the girls were at least always around. In this book, Benny is almost as big as Henry (as depicted in the illustrations), and he and Henry are the main characters. Though it was nice to see Henry in a front-and-center role again, Violet and Jessie basically only showed up in the beginning and end of the book.
The mystery itself was a good one, I thought. Maybe even one of my favorites, though that might be because of the nostalgia I felt for the old-fashioned department store that delivered small items to its customers. Basically, some strange things happen at the store, and everyone wonders who is behind it all.
I also liked that this book included a wider range of emotions than most others in this series. Usually, the family is happy and friendly and everyone likes them. But in this book, Henry and Benny find that other people actually resent them for the advantages they enjoy by being the grandchildren of the wealthy and powerful James Alden. Henry and Benny even find themselves feeling angry and indignant!
Anyway, I do wonder if the author knew this would be her last book of the series... I was hoping to find some kind of closure to wrap up the series - What does Henry do when he graduates from college? Does Jessie marry Mr. Carter? - but was disappointed in that regard.
Even though I still have more Boxcar Children books to read (I plan to read all 19 of the original series), I actually feel a bit sad knowing that this is the last book of the series written by Gertrude Chandler Warner.
I haven't read all the books in the series yet, but this book differs from many of the others in that not all of the children are present for the mystery. Some of the earlier books do focus more on Benny, but Henry and the girls were at least always around. In this book, Benny is almost as big as Henry (as depicted in the illustrations), and he and Henry are the main characters. Though it was nice to see Henry in a front-and-center role again, Violet and Jessie basically only showed up in the beginning and end of the book.
The mystery itself was a good one, I thought. Maybe even one of my favorites, though that might be because of the nostalgia I felt for the old-fashioned department store that delivered small items to its customers. Basically, some strange things happen at the store, and everyone wonders who is behind it all.
I also liked that this book included a wider range of emotions than most others in this series. Usually, the family is happy and friendly and everyone likes them. But in this book, Henry and Benny find that other people actually resent them for the advantages they enjoy by being the grandchildren of the wealthy and powerful James Alden. Henry and Benny even find themselves feeling angry and indignant!
Anyway, I do wonder if the author knew this would be her last book of the series... I was hoping to find some kind of closure to wrap up the series - What does Henry do when he graduates from college? Does Jessie marry Mr. Carter? - but was disappointed in that regard.
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
The Lighthouse Mystery (The Boxcar Children #8) by Gertrude Chandler Warner
★★½
For the first time, I thought the children - though it's hard to call Henry a child since he is now in college - came across as spoiled! The family drives by a lighthouse for sale, and the kids ask Grandfather to buy it as if it's no big deal! It's weird, too, because later on, when the kids want to go swimming but don't have any bathing suits, Jessie is hesitant to ask for new ones because "four new suits would cost too much." Their money sense just seems to be out of whack.
While many of the books include some thing or other that dates the writing - e.g., a reference to "long distance phone calls", or illustrations of the kids boating without life jackets - this one included something that seemed a bit much even for "the old days". The family wants to have a place to eat outdoors, so they move around the rocks to form chairs and a table, and then they cement the rocks in place! This activity just doesn't sit well with me in today's heightened environmental consciousness, and there really isn't even any sense of nostalgia to redeem it. It seemed like an arrogant and entitled thing to do.
I was also kind of bummed that the author seems to have made up the names of the towns in this book. We know the Boxcar Children live some place in New England, but are they in MA? Or CT? This book mentions two towns: Conley and Ashland. There is an Ashland in MA, but it's not a seaside community, and I can't find any Conley anywhere in New England. Oh, well.
Finally, I don't know if I'm just getting tired of the Boxcar Children's we'll-fix-the-world adventures, but for the first time, their interest in other people's activities seemed to border on meddling. Sure, this "Cook boy" was gruff and seemingly unhappy, but was it really any of the Aldens' business? I can understand their interest in any goings-on at the house next to the lighthouse, but beyond that, why are they so interested in other people's affairs?
For the first time, I thought the children - though it's hard to call Henry a child since he is now in college - came across as spoiled! The family drives by a lighthouse for sale, and the kids ask Grandfather to buy it as if it's no big deal! It's weird, too, because later on, when the kids want to go swimming but don't have any bathing suits, Jessie is hesitant to ask for new ones because "four new suits would cost too much." Their money sense just seems to be out of whack.
While many of the books include some thing or other that dates the writing - e.g., a reference to "long distance phone calls", or illustrations of the kids boating without life jackets - this one included something that seemed a bit much even for "the old days". The family wants to have a place to eat outdoors, so they move around the rocks to form chairs and a table, and then they cement the rocks in place! This activity just doesn't sit well with me in today's heightened environmental consciousness, and there really isn't even any sense of nostalgia to redeem it. It seemed like an arrogant and entitled thing to do.
I was also kind of bummed that the author seems to have made up the names of the towns in this book. We know the Boxcar Children live some place in New England, but are they in MA? Or CT? This book mentions two towns: Conley and Ashland. There is an Ashland in MA, but it's not a seaside community, and I can't find any Conley anywhere in New England. Oh, well.
Finally, I don't know if I'm just getting tired of the Boxcar Children's we'll-fix-the-world adventures, but for the first time, their interest in other people's activities seemed to border on meddling. Sure, this "Cook boy" was gruff and seemingly unhappy, but was it really any of the Aldens' business? I can understand their interest in any goings-on at the house next to the lighthouse, but beyond that, why are they so interested in other people's affairs?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)