Sunday, December 30, 2012

Dolphin Tale (2011)

★★★

*** Warning! This review contains spoilers. ***

A good movie for kids. Even Isabelle - who has seen very few movies because she is easily scared or emotionally upset by scenes that are in any way unpleasant - watched the whole movie and enjoyed it.

I liked the messages that the movie conveyed. A boy who struggled in school found joy in learning when he found a subject about which he was enthusiastic. The same boy saw a problem and found a solution - even though implementing that solution required going out on a limb and committing a lot more than he ever imagined. A young man who was dealt a major blow in the prime of his life learns - with some help from the boy - to overcome personal, physical, and emotional challenges. You get the idea that you should push yourself to do more than you think you can, and every person can make a real impact if they are willing to take action.

I thought for sure that the single mom and the single dad would get together, but the movie skipped that Hollywood twist.

Friday, December 28, 2012

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (#1) (2012)

★★★★★

So, as we know, The Hobbit, the book, is a prequel to the LOTR series, and it is shorter, simpler, and more approachable than any of the individual books in the trilogy. I have to admit, then, that before seeing the movie, I wasn't entirely sure that dividing the film version into three parts was a good idea.

But, come on! What did I have to be skeptical about?! This is Peter Jackson, who gave us the amazing LOTR trilogy on the big screen! (I have just now realized that I never rated those movies, but of course, they all would get 5 stars!)

I was practically giddy just watching the movie, it was such a great adventure! My only complaint now, about there being three parts, is that I have to wait to see the sequel!

I haven't recently read the book, so of course a re-reading is in order, but my impression is that the movie follows the book pretty closely - lots of the scenes were familiar.

One thing that surprised me is that there was no effort at all to individually introduce all the dwarves - Thorin and Balin had more prominent roles, and Kili and Fili stood out as well, but all the rest just blended together. Afterwards, I realized that I didn't even know which dwarf was Gloin, which would have been fun to know just because he is, of course, Gimli's father.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Ramona and Beezus (2010)

★★★½

Isabelle was the one who actually gave this movie the 3 1/2 star rating, and when I asked her why it wasn't so great, she said, "The beginning wasn't very interesting." I agree! It started out kind of slow, and we had no problem pausing it in the middle to eat dinner. Returning to the movie after dinner, it gradually got better so that by the end, I was really enjoying it.

Even though the Ramona Quimby books span ages four through ten for Ramona, Ramona is nine years old in this movie. Still, the movie manages to include plenty of Ramona's misadventures from the entire series, and they are all tied together really well.

As you'd expect, there was plenty from the books that was omitted. I didn't mind Daisy being left out, but I did miss Yard Ape.

Actually, any disappointment I may have felt about omissions was probably made up for by the clever additions. In the books, Beezus, as Aunt Bea's namesake, seemed to have more of a connection with Aunt Bea. In the movie, Ramona also had a connection because they were both younger sisters. I liked that Beezus and Henry Huggins were into each other in high school. (Henry gradually just faded away in the books.) Uncle Hobart was more likable in the movie, and he and Aunt Bea's relationship was more fleshed out, though his profession wasn't exactly clear in the movie. Mr. Quimby was well portrayed, and I like the way his job situation was resolved in the movie.

In the movie, a bigger deal was made about the Quimby family having to move so that Mr. Quimby can accept a job farther away. In the book, it was just a possibility, but in the movie, the house was actually put up for sale. Isabelle said her favorite part of the movie was that the Quimbys got to stay in their home.

Ramona's World (Ramona Quimby #8) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★★

Even though I was so sad to say goodbye to Ramona, I was pleased that the series ended on a high note.

This book returns to the familiar format of the earlier books in the series. It focuses on Ramona, her growing-up experiences, and how she deals with them. In Ramona's World, Ramona makes a new best friend, her friendship with Yard Ape continues to develop, and she and Susan even come to a bit of an understanding. She is more mature and responsible, though she still manages to inadvertently get herself into trouble.

I like that this book also puts a spotlight on Beezus's growing-up experiences. It's her first year in high school, and she is worried about her complexion, she makes new friends, gets her ears pierced, and goes to her first boy-girl party.

Isabelle may not be old enough to really understand some of the Beezus stuff, but I think she can relate to Ramona's struggle with spelling - that is, having to put up with something she has to do, but doesn't like. (In Isabelle's case, that would be Chinese school homework.)

I even picked up a little parenting tip! When Ramona faces a situation in which she turns to her mother for help, Mrs. Quimby says to Ramona, "Cope". I like that! Instead of getting into a wordy reminder to "find a solution" and "work it out yourself" - just one word is needed.

Finally, I like that Ramona's attitude towards Roberta is more complicated now than it was when she was first born. At first, Ramona was all happy and welcoming, but just like in real life, the reality of having a new family member quickly sinks in. Ramona doesn't get so far as to resent Roberta, but she is no longer always thrilled to have the baby around, and it's clear that she understands that she has to share her mother even more now, and she especially values any time she gets to spend with her mother.

As for Isabelle, what she liked most about this book is that Ramona and Yard Ape become friends. I like that, too!

Friday, December 21, 2012

The Polar Express (2004)

★★½

Sebastien's Pre-K class had a "Polar Express Party", where they planned to wear pajamas, eat popcorn and pizza, and watch The Polar Express. Unfortunately, it was planned on a Wednesday, not a day Sebastien usually goes to school. He actually didn't mind at all, and we just decided to have our own "Polar Express Party" at home instead, on the same day.

At first I was afraid that Isabelle would be upset about missing out, but as it turned out, she said she didn't want to watch the movie anyway. She's seen it already, at the "Polar Express Party" when she was in Pre-K, and she didn't like it!

Now that I've seen the movie myself, I can totally see why Isabelle doesn't like it. In the book, the boy is sure that Santa exists, despite the fact that he has friends who tell him otherwise. In the movie, the boy doubts Santa's existence and is on the verge of not believing. Clearly, it is not a movie for very young children - by showing this movie to a child who believes in Santa, you are essentially introducing doubt! This movie is really for older children who are already doubting, or who have outgrown Santa but wouldn't mind a bit of childhood nostalgia.

The movie is furthermore geared towards older kids because it really is filled with one scary / anxiety-filled scene after another. First a little boy almost misses the train - Oh, no!!! Then the main character boy almost loses another girl's ticket - Aaahhhh!!! Before you know it, the boy is walking on top of the speeding train in the freezing cold in the middle of the night all alone, where he encounters some kind of ghost hobo who vanishes into thin air?!? Then there's the roller coaster ride from the front of the train, the train trying to outrun the breaking ice, and the creepy marionette in the train car for recycled toys. It is nothing like the train ride in the book, which was an altogether pleasant ride of Christmas carols and tasty snacks. Even the moment when the boy first sees Santa Claus - or rather, can't see him (because of the crowds) or hear the sleigh bells - is more of an anxious moment than a joyous moment.

Sure, the movie ends exactly as it does in the book, but the whole ride really wasn't worth it. Too bad. Just stick with the book.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

The Three Musketeers (1973)

★★

I really wanted to like this movie, but it was so campy and dated that I found myself multi-tasking, and then forgetting to actually watch the movie.

To its credit, the movie did have good sets and good costumes, and it included unexpected details from the book - like d'Artagnan's mother's healing ointment, the Cardinal's guards paying the townspeople to cheer for the Cardinal, and the Duke of Buckingham's shrine to Anne of Austria.

But then, other important details from the book were inexplicably changed, seemingly for no reason. d'Artagnan did not lose his letter of introduction when he first encountered Rochefort, and d'Artagnan did not save Constance when she was first kidnapped by the Cardinal's guards - she got away merely by being clumsy! Obviously, Constance was made into a klutz for comic purposes, but why cut out a good swashbuckling scene? Frequently, opportunities to showcase swashbuckling were enhanced by bringing in the three musketeers to aid d'Artagnan, though they were not all four so frequently brought together in the book. At one point, it's made clear that d'Artagnan is illiterate - What!? Why!? Weird.

Overall, the movie was just too corny, and the actors never drew me in. I wanted so much to like it, I even tried to watch the sequel, The Four Musketeers, which presumably finishes the story from where the first movie left off. It's not often that I just give up on a movie and turn it off, but I really just found myself not enjoying the movie at all. Now I can't even give the sequel a rating because I didn't even finish watching it!

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Ramona Forever (Ramona Quimby #7) by Beverly Cleary

★★★½

*** Warning: This review contains spoilers! ***

Isabelle wanted to give this book 4 stars, and I actually wanted to give it 3, so I'm compromising with 3 1/2.

Thinking back about this book, I'm a little sad that Ramona is growing up. In the first few books of the series, I really felt immersed in Ramona's world, like Beverly Cleary was opening my eyes to a child's perspective. In this book, Ramona is in 3rd grade, and she basically now understands the world around her, and she fits in. Maybe there's a sense of bittersweetness; it's nice that Ramona grows up and is not so troublesome anymore, but she's growing up! It's just too fast. I miss the little girl! And she's just a fictional character. Isabelle - my little girl! - is really growing up fast! *sniff*

Anyway, anyway. So now that Ramona is growing up, the book is no longer really focused on her and her perspective. It's more like a book about the whole Quimby family. ("That's okay!" Isabelle says.) It's nice to see what happens to the characters - like wanting to follow the story arc of a TV series. And this book - this episode - is kind of like the one in which the series jumps the shark. There's a new baby, a wedding, a character moves away, and a pet dies.

Isabelle, for her part, likes the book because Ramona gets a little sister. I asked her what exactly about Ramona getting a little sister did she like, and she said, "Because I want one." Ha. Too bad, she got stuck with a little brother.

Well, there is one last book to read, and we'll see how that one goes. I'm actually already sad at the anticipation of having to say goodbye to Ramona Quimby, so I'm afraid I may have some high hopes for the final book in the series...

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Twenty Years After (The d'Artagnan Romances #2) by Alexandre Dumas

★★★★

*** Warning: This review contains spoilers! ***

Before reading this book, if you had asked me whether or not I enjoy reading historical fiction, I would have quickly answered, "No." In my opinion, most prominent historical figures actually led interesting lives, so why bother making stuff up about them? I was once turned off by a historical fiction book about John F. Kennedy - it just seemed a bit ridiculous. Here's a man whose place in American history is larger than life, and dozens of biographies have been written about various aspects of his personal and political life - why make up a story when there are fascinating true stories to be told?

It wasn't until I started reading Twenty Years After that I had a sudden epiphany: the "d'Artagnan Romances" are all historical fiction! While reading The Three Musketeers, of course I knew that the King of France, Anne of Austria, and Richelieu were real people, and along the way I found out that d'Artagnan himself was an actual person, too! But I didn't put the "historical fiction" label on the series until I started reading Twenty Years After and found myself Googling "Mazarin" and "Frondist". I gradually realized that the reason I so much enjoy Alexandre Dumas's historical fiction, while shunning other historical fiction I have encountered in the past, is because - perhaps to the chagrin of my high school world history teacher - I literally had absolutely zero knowledge of the English and French historical figures in his books. I might as well have been reading about fictional characters. For a while, when the four friends were perpetually on the verge of saving England's King Charles I, I was in such suspense! Not having any clue about the life and death of King Charles I, I really didn't know - would they save him or not?! Haha. (The same thing happened to me in reading The Three Musketeers. For the well-educated student of history, wondering whether or not John Felton would succeed in assassinating the Duke of Buckingham is perhaps like wondering whether or not Lee Harvey Oswald would succeed in assassinating John F. Kennedy.) On the other hand, I am so well acquainted - simply by being an American - with John F. Kennedy's life story that I just couldn't take the jump to fictionalizing him.

Anyway, the actual historical context of this book was even more confusing than it was in The Three Musketeers. So you had Mazarinists and Frondists, but then what of the many dukes and princes!? I couldn't really figure out or keep track of who was on which side, or whether or not that information was really important to the story anyway. All I knew is that the four friends found themselves in opposing political parties, and that really bummed me out.

It really was kind of sad to see middle-aged versions of the musketeers, though I guess d'Artagnan was the only one who I really sort of pitied. Athos was in a good place, and even if Aramis was perpetually conflicted about whether he was truly an abbe or a musketeer, at least he managed to keep himself involved. Porthos, of course, wished for a barony, but since Mousqueton was so happy with their life, I found Porthos's wistfulness more comical than anything else. (Indeed, Porthos was frequently much more the comic relief in this book than in the previous one.) d'Artagnan, though, was still, after twenty years, only a lieutenant! Dumas poignantly described him in this way: "So long as he was surrounded by his friends he retained his youth and the poetry of his character... Athos imparted to him his greatness of soul, Porthos his enthusiasm, Aramis his elegance. Had D'Artagnan continued his intimacy with these three men he would have become a superior character." Alas, they had separated.

It was satisfying to see that the original three musketeers still had their original lackeys in their service. Planchet alone had gone his own way, and he had his own part to play in this story. Happily, he still had a special place in his heart for d'Artagnan.

Like The Three Musketeers, Twenty Years After wasn't really a funny book overall, but it had moments of comical genius. Honestly, I laughed out loud when d'Artagnan spoke of the biscuits as "veritable sponges", and I even related the excerpt to Ken!

In so many ways, Twenty Years After was a great continuation of The Three Musketeers. There's plenty of swashbuckling and action, and such honor! Such nobility! Even more than before, we see examples of d'Artagnan's cleverness.

Sadly, in the end, we see the four friends part once again. I can't pick up the next volume in the series fast enough.

Saturday, December 8, 2012

The Three Musketeers (1948)

★★★★★

*** Warning: This review constains spoilers! ***

I love this movie!

Great costumes, great casting - it's a beauty to watch. Especially the swashbuckling! Even the scenes of galloping horses were exciting. I also saw, for the first time, a beautiful young Angela Lansbury. Really, just an all-around very entertaining movie!

This screen adaptation is, for the most part, delightfully true to the book. Buttercup, the Count de Warde, and Kitty are included, and we see that all four lackeys exist, though Planchet is the only one with a major role, and Grimaud is the only other one mentioned by name.

My prudish sensibilities actually appreciated some of the efforts to "purify" the story. Madame Bonacieux in the book is Mademoiselle Bonacieux in the movie, and she is d'Artagnan's landlord's niece rather than his wife. Instead of talking about "rich mistresses", the movie has "rich widows".

As the story progresses, it gradually starts to deviate from the book, mostly to simplify and condense the story. It is, after all, only a 2 hour movie. There is no siege of La Rochelle, and Lord de Winter and John Felton are omitted. In a nice twist, Constance is sent by the Queen to the Duke of Buckingham in England for her safety (rather than to a French convent), and she ends up being Milady's jailer. There is no "Hollywood ending" for Constance or Milady - there the movie is completely faithful to the book.

I liked this movie so much that I watched it again the very next day, and enjoyed just as much the second time!

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Ramona Quimby, Age 8 (Ramona Quimby #6) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★

In this book, Ramona is in third grade, and she starts to mature. There's a boy in her class who could have become a bully to her, but with the right attitude and some clever thinking, she managed to turn the relationship into one of respectful teasing. She doesn't cause as much trouble in this book, which on the one hand makes for less interesting reading, but on the other hand makes me feel (as a parent!) hopeful that the difficult behavior I see in Isabelle really might just be, at least in part, a function of her age. :P

While Ramona had had misunderstandings with her teachers before, this time, it becomes personal, and for the first time, Ramona struggles with the idea that some people - even grown-ups - actually might not like her.

As usual, Beverly Cleary effectively gets inside Ramona's head, and you get a good sense of what really matters in the world of a third grader.

As for Isabelle, she says she liked the part when Ramona made a cat mask for her oral book report. In the books, Ramona is very creative and artistic, and when she gets assigned an oral book report, she comes up with a really clever way of doing it. She throws herself into her project and is proud of her work. Even if Isabelle only remembered this part of the book because of the silliness factor, it's nice that it also had a have-fun-with-your-work-and-be-proud-of-what-you-can-do component.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The Three Musketeers (2011)

★★★

Definitely an action-adventure flick. The movie has a lot more swashbuckling and gun fighting than the book, and it's clear this is a Hollywood production. I didn't realize until afterwards that the movie was intended for 3D, and in retrospect, it probably would have been a lot more impressive as a big screen, 3D experience.

From the very beginning, this movie plays fast and loose with the original story. The movie invents a crazy back story in which Athos, Porthos, and Aramis are in cahoots with Milady, and they are involved in some kind of James Bond-like intrigue. Oddly, Buckingham is an over-stylized villain.

I thought Orlando Bloom was overly dramatic as Buckingham, and actually, I would have preferred to see him as d'Artagnan! d'Artagnan was a bit younger than I expected (15-ish instead of 19-ish), and Athos and Porthos came across as a lot older than I expected (mid-30's instead of mid-20's). Buckingham and Aramis shared an uncanny resemblance, which is actually an important point in the book, but completely irrelevant in this movie.

I did enjoy the casting of the cardinal, the king, and the queen.

Besides the glaring deviations from the book, and the altogether invented material, I also wondered why smaller deviations were made. Why make Athos, Porthos, and Aramis ex-musketeers? It would have been fun to see them in musketeer uniforms.

There were also shortcuts and LOTS of omissions - no Captain de Treville, no Grimaud or Mosqueton or Bazin, no fleur-de-lis, no Lord de Winter. But what else could be expected, the book is much too long and complex to be done justice in a two-hour movie.

The ending is completely different from the book's ending, but it's about what you would expect from a Hollywood movie. Clearly there is a sequel in the works, but I don't expect it to be in any way related to the books. Overall, the movie is comfortably light-hearted, and the song for the closing credits, "When We Were Young," really captures the spirit if the book.

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Ramona and Her Mother (Ramona Quimby #5) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★

Okay, just after saying that this series deserves 5 stars across the board, I'm giving 4 stars to Ramona and Her Mother. :P

It's not that this book isn't great - it is! - I just didn't find it quite as interesting as the others. Ramona watches her mother and Beezus bond while hosting a brunch and discussing hair, and she feels left out. She yearns for her mother to show her the same type of affection that she shows Beezus.

As a mother, I am always thinking about "fairness"... Of course, I need to treat my older daughter differently than the way I treat my younger son - they are different ages, different genders, different people! But, at the same time, I don't want either kid to feel shafted when one or the other is getting more attention, for whatever reason. Well, maybe I feel like the underlying issue in this book wasn't addressed - Beezus is older, and therefore, she gets different kinds of attention than Ramona. In the end, all Ramona wanted was for her mother to say the same things to her as she said to Beezus. I suppose it's a good reminder that kids really do listen, even when we think they aren't, so we should give thought to what we say.

Isabelle, anyway, says her favorite part of this book was when Beezus got her hair cut and styled by a beauty school student, and when it turned out looking awful, Ramona wanted Beezus to look like herself. I'm pleased with this answer, because it shows that Isabelle actually has a sense of compassion. :P Even though Ramona was in the midst of feeling jealous of the attention Beezus was getting from their mother, that didn't stop her from wanting her sister to look like her sister.

Ramona and Her Father (Ramona Quimby #4) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★★

I wish I could just review the entire series all at once, because these 5-star ratings are just getting repetitive.

In this book, Beverly Cleary broadens Ramona's world and introduces some more serious concepts. Ramona's father loses his job, and thanks to Beezus, Ramona learns that her father's smoking is a terrible habit. Not unexpectedly, Beverly Cleary is able to frame these issues from Ramona's perspective. Ramona may not understand money matters, but she understands that when her father isn't working, he's always cross, and that, in turn, affects the entire family's dynamics. She also doesn't know exactly why smoking is bad, but she just wants to save her father's life.

Isabelle likes that Beezus and Ramona work together to get their father to stop smoking - they don't always get along, but sometimes, they do.

Ramona the Brave (Ramona Quimby #3) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★★

Up until now, we've been reading Ramona books illustrated by Tracy Dockray. I really like her drawings because they do such a great job of conveying the emotions of each character - from elation to concern to anger. Illustrations definitely add to the story, helping Isabelle to put a greater context around the words being read.

Since we're going through the series by borrowing books from the library, we read whatever editions are available. With this book, for the first time, we encountered a different illustrator - Alan Tiegreen. I thought Isabelle might not like the change, but she told me that in school, her teacher reads books illustrated by yet another person, who turned out to be Jacqueline Rogers. This is great! I personally prefer Tracy Dockray's pictures because Alan Tiegreen's drawings look, well, not so cute. :P But they do do an equally good job of bringing the story to life, and I love that Isabelle is seeing different interpretations of the same characters.

In Ramona the Brave, Ramona is in first grade, just like Isabelle! Ramona begins to learn a few things about people and relationships - other people may sometimes behave in ways that belittle you, and some people (like teachers) may misinterpret situations in such a way as to misunderstand you completely. Poor Ramona! I really felt for her in this book. I think every person has some strong memory of being misunderstood as a child.

Interestingly, while I focused on the emotions and the possible take-away lessons, Isabelle said her favorite thing about this book was the brick factory game that Ramona played with Howie. How typical! :) The parent tries to emphasize some worthy lesson, but the child really just wants to enjoy the story. :P

Ramona the Pest (Ramona Quimby #2) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★★

Isabelle and I are going through the entire Ramona Quimby series!

I actually remember reading (or hearing) this book as a child - I think in first grade - because I have a distinct memory of the "dawnzer" that "gives a lee light". :)

Ramona the Pest was especially fun because in this book, Ramona is in kindergarten, and Isabelle just finished kindergarten. Since Isabelle is my older child, I really didn't know what to expect when she started kindergarten, and I spent a lot of time worrying and wondering about whether or not her behavior and skill level in various areas was "normal". For me, I struggled with watching Isabelle struggle with her behavior - she was an angel in school, but a bear at home! This book - though fiction - highlights how difficult it is for young children to conform to expectations of behavior, and even though it's not a parenting book, it really helped me to better understand Isabelle and more easily forgive her less-than-ideal behavior.

Isabelle, who is in first grade now, likes this book because when her teacher read it aloud in class, she had the class "crank back their minds" - complete with whirring sound effects and a hand gesture cranking their minds backwards - to think about what kindergarten was like for them. Clearly, Isabelle is able to identify with Ramona, and of course, being able to identify with the characters in a book always makes for good reading!

Beezus and Ramona (Ramona Quimby #1) by Beverly Cleary

★★★★★

I remember reading some, not all, of the Ramona Quimby series when I was a kid. I was delighted when Isabelle told me that Beezus and Ramona was the "read aloud" book at school - which means her teacher reads it aloud during snack time and after lunch.

I really love this series! I have as much fun reading these books to Isabelle as Isabelle does listening to me read them. Beezus and Ramona introduces us to Ramona, and as a mother, I feel better just knowing that someone - Beverly Cleary! - seemed to understand what it's like to parent a difficult child like Ramona. It made me feel not so bad about my own kids' misbehavior. :P I like that it highlights the relationship between two sisters - they love each other, of course, but they don't always like each other, and that's okay.

From a kid's standpoint, Isabelle says she likes this book because when Ramona wants to get a library card, she tries to sign her name as a series of i's and t's. Yes, this is what Isabelle loves about this book! Clearly, Beverly Cleary understands children! She gets inside the head of Ramona and gives us a peek of what might be going through a child's mind. She shows us that even when Ramona misbehaves, there is some kind of reason for her behavior that is logical to a child.

The Count of Monte Cristo (2002)

★★★½

*** Warning: This review contains spoilers! ***

I remember being very excited to see this movie in the theaters, and then being very disappointed. After re-reading the book - and seeing the French mini-series - I actually ended up enjoying this re-watching more than I thought I would.

Of course, the original 1,462-page story is really too much for a standard 2-hour movie, so some condensing of the story and omissions of characters is expected. Making Fernand the son of a count actually turned out to be a smart way of making Mercedes into a countess without having to spend any time on Janina, which was completely left out. No Haydee! A significant omission, but one could easily suspect the she would not be needed in a Hollywood version of the story.

All told, I wouldn't be surprised if there were more characters omitted than included - no Caderousse, no Bertuccio (who was replaced by Jacopo, whose role was increased), no Benedetto, no alter egos for the Count of Monte Cristo, no Maximilian and Valentine love story, no Franz or DeBray or Beauchamp. The only young person was Albert, whose story was given an unexpected twist.

Danglar and Villefort were minimized, and Edmond's revenge on them was much less complex than in the book. Fernand was the primary antagonist, and he was made into a womanizing gambler with no sense of honor at all - quite a change from the character in the book.

Despite all the differences from the book, I really enjoyed the first part of the movie. I loved that the movie progressed chronologically, and we saw Edmond at sea, we saw the love between him and Mercedes, and we saw the hope of his future as he was promoted to captain. Edmond's imprisonment, and his developing relationship with the Abbé Faria, was portrayed so well that it was just all that much more disappointing when, after Edmond escaped, the story veered farther and farther from the book.

I thought the casting of Edmond was perfect - he made a believable transformation from naive young sailor to worldly count. Mercedes, though, didn't have the dignity or the beauty I expected. Guy Pearce was maybe a bit over-dramatic as Fernand.

The ending, though far from the one laid out in the book, was about what you'd expect from a Hollywood production. I really didn't mind, but being such a huge fan of the book, I just can't bring myself to give this movie more stars. Still, it was entertaining, and not bad.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The Count of Monte Cristo (1998)

★★

*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!! ***

Ugh. So much of my time watching this mini-series was spent feeling disappointed that I really can't bring myself to give it more than 2 stars. Where do I begin?

Of course, whenever a movie is based on a book, every way in which the movie deviates from the book is a point of criticism for me. I do understand that in order to simplify the story for the screen, the story sometimes needs to be condensed, or characters omitted. In this way, it did not really bother me at all that Eugenie Danglars and Julie Morrel were left out, or that Madame Danglar's affair with Lucien DeBray (also completely omitted) was not included.

I can't, however, so easily overlook other omissions or modifications that seemed to serve no purpose. Haydee was not introduced until much later in the story, which was detrimental to the Count's character development. Her mere presence upon their arrival in Paris is what gave the Count an air of mystery and eccentricity. Without Haydee, the Count came across as just another rich guy.

I suppose it made sense, for simplicity's sake, to separate Benedetto from Bertuccio, but was it really necessary to change Benedetto's name? His role became so minor, his entire relationship with the Count having been omitted, that the whole court scene in which he identifies Villefort as his father was omitted! This scene was pivotal in the book, filled with drama, and without it, Villefort doesn't descend into madness as he does in the book.

And speaking of Villefort - Madame Villefort's cherished son, Edward, was completely left out as well. Indeed, he had a small role to play, but it was significant in that it was only upon his death that the Count of Monte Cristo realized - by his own accord - that his vengeance had gone too far.

Instead of having that meaningful moment of self-realization, the movie gives us the Count's realization through Camille, who was not in the book at all and who was nothing but an annoying, infuriating distraction. At one point in the movie, Monte Cristo calls Valentine "too blond, too insipid" - he might as well have been talking about Camille, and yet, he supposedly fell for her! A huge part of the Count of Monte Cristo's character was his long-held belief that having had his heart broken by Mercedes, he did not think he was capable, nor did he think he was worthy, of loving again. And even though we saw a glimmer of hope in Monte Cristo, it wasn't until after everything unfolded that he allowed himself to feel love again. The one redeeming thing about Camille is that the Count did not end up with her.

But wait, there's more. Instead of progressing chronologically from the beginning, the movie relied too much on flashbacks to explain why Edmond Dantes was in prison in the first place, and it never really explained the motivation of Danglars or Fernand. We never saw a true portrait of the young, happy, life-loving, filled-with-potential Edmond, and so the viewer never got a good sense for what was really sacrified when Edmond was sent to prison.

In the book, it was clear that the only way Edmond was able to survive so many years in prison was because he and the Abbe Faria devoted their time to Edmond's all-around education - in politics, languages, alchemy, etc. Why did the movie dismiss all that, and say that the abbe taught him nothing?!

The movie also took strange liberties to introduce a sexual angle to the story. Besides the booty call with Camille (which was LAME-O!), Edmond encountered a superfluous prostitute when he first escaped from prison, and then the judge who pardoned Peppino had a weird fetish! Why bother with that stuff?

Overall, the lack of attention to details was disappointing. The "red silk purse" represented so much in the book, why change it to a dull brown sack!? The portrait of Mercedes looking out to sea let the reader know that Mercedes never stopped loving Edmond - so why leave it out of the movie?

Finally, much of the casting and character portrayals just didn't seem right. I really did not find Gerard Depardieu convincing at all. He was not the imposing figure I've always imagined the Count to be. Instead, he was stocky and fat and his shoulders were distractingly broad. Albert did not have any of the joie de vivre that he had in the book, and one of the best scenes in the book - when Albert slept peacefully while in Luigi Vampa's lair - was, of course, omitted. Fernand looked about 20 years too old.

So, was there anything I liked about this mini-series? Honestly, I didn't mind the new, Hollywood ending, because deep down I sort of wished for that ending in the book, too. I liked the way the movie gave us a glimpse of the Count's alchemy lab, so we see how he came to possess so many vials of potions and antidotes. Mostly, though, as I watched the episodes, I found myself just waiting for the series to end.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

The Three Musketeers (The d'Artagnan Romances #1) by Alexandre Dumas

★★★★

*** Warning: This review contains spoilers! ***

A really entertaining read!

The first part of the book, in which we are introduced to d'Artagnan and the three musketeers, is downright funny. I swear I laughed out loud! As the story progresses, though, the humor is replaced by the drama of mistresses, duels, war, and intrigue.

I have to admit that all the illicit affairs with married women somewhat affected my prudish sensibilities. Maybe that sort of thing was accepted practice back then, though Dumas still seemed to go out of his way to show the reader that both Madame Bonacieux and Madame Coquenard were stuck in pitiful, loveless marriages. At first I kept thinking that poor Madame Coquenard was being quite ill-used by Porthos, but in the end it all worked out, I guess.

The ease with which the men fought duels also took some getting used to. The idea that a man would be willing to die over some off-the-cuff remark was crazy!

Characters were reliably one-dimensional, which generally speaking makes for less interesting reading, but in this case, it allowed me to confidently put my faith into certain characters without having to worry about being let down by some sort of surprise twist. There was no annoying Harry Potter-esque withholding of information - everyone dutifully told everyone else what was going on, and Monsieur de Treville - always in a position to help - was admirably informed throughout the book. 

The only character whose one-dimensionalism I really didn't appreciate was Milady's. Ugh! Even as her history was gradually revealed, we never got to the root of her evil. Why was she in the convent in the first place? What was her motivation for being so evil? With her wits and feminine wiles, she could have had fame and fortune without having to be wicked to boot.

To better appreciate the book, I really could have stood to have a better understanding of French and European politics and religion at the time. Every now and then, I just muddled along, content to accept that this one person was enemies with that person and allies with that other person, but not really understanding why.

Finally, I just have to say that I really loved the ending. Not the epilogue (which was good, too, though I was sorry to see the group disbanded), but the last conversation between d'Artagnan and Athos, in which d'Artagnan says he has "nothing but bitter recollections," and Athos responds, "You are young, and your bitter recollections have time to change themselves into sweet remembrances." Ah, so poignant! Those early days, when the four friends pooled their money during times of wealth, and then equally shared the burden of hunger when the money was gone, would surely one day be looked upon as bittersweet memories.

If only we all had such devoted friends in our lives. "All for one, one for all!"

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas

★★★★★

O, Edmond! Edmond!

I love this book.

I was inspired to re-read it after spending a month in Corsica, where, on a clear day, you can see the island of Monte Cristo from the east coast beaches. When setting eyes on the outline of this large rock, it's not hard to imagine something mysterious associated with it. In fact, these days, you can take a boat near the island to fish, but if you get too close, military boats come along to shoo you off.

As a story, The Count of Monte Cristo has everything - everything! Deception! Intrigue! Romance! Ambition! Honor and vengeance, redemption and forgiveness. More than one character sinks to the depths of utter despair. All that's missing is a bit of swashbuckling, which might have appeared, except that the story took a different turn...

Towards the beginning, it would probably help to know just a little about the politics around the time of Napolean. You can get by on context, though I did find myself reading up on some Wikipedia entries.

As the story progresses, it does get a bit soap opera-y, as all the characters eventually come together, and everyone happens to know everyone else. But, all the connections do make for a great story, so I'm not complaining. If this is your first time reading the book, it might help to write down the characters in order to keep track of them.

At 1,462 pages, this book can be called a tome. But don't let that discourage you! It's just more of the story to enjoy. I usually can only get a few pages of reading in a day, and it honestly made me happy just to have this book to look forward to, for whenever I might find a spare five minutes to indulge myself.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Lady Susan, The Watsons, Sanditon by Jane Austen (Edited by Margaret Drabble)

★★★

Three unfinished stories are included in this collection - "Lady Susan," "The Watsons," and "Sanditon" - plus a lot of additional reading under the titles of "Introduction," "Social Background," "A Note on the Text," "Notes," and "Chronology."

Despite being called the "Introduction," I think that chapter might actually be best read after having finished each of the stories. It certainly sheds light on story lines and characters, but it's hard to follow without knowing who or what is being discussed. I found myself going back to re-read parts of the Introduction while reading each of the stories.

"Social Background" would probably be most appreciated by a reader who has not already read other Jane Austen novels, one who doesn't totally grasp the social context of the time. But if you're not already an ardent Jane Austen fan, then this really isn't the book to be using as your introduction to her work anyway. Still, this chapter is short enough that it's worth reading, and you still might learn a thing or two about Jane Austen's era.

"A Note on the Text" I actually found to be the most interesting bit to read before jumping into the stories. This short chapter tells a little about what kind of editing was needed to get these unfinished stories into a publishable state.

"Notes" may very well have been my favorite part of this book! This chapter of footnotes sheds even more light on Jane Austen's writing. Very frequently, the footnotes tell you that instead of the words you just read, Jane Austen originally wrote different words, but then erased them or crossed them out. It was really fascinating to think about what kind of consideration went into Jane Austen's word choice. Additionally, this section provided interesting information, clarification, and reaction to various parts of the text.

"Chronology" provides a nice overview of major world events that occurred during Jane Austen's lifetime, plus major events in her personal life as well.

As for the stories themselves... "Lady Susan" came first, and it was my least favorite piece. It is an "epistolary novel" - one written as a series of letters among the main characters. It was my first exposure to such a book, and honestly, it just seems like such a constrictive way of telling a story. Maybe in a more traditional novel, the same characters could have been fleshed out to be more complex, but as they were written, many of them were one-dimensional. 

"The Watsons" is most similar to Jane Austen's other well-known works, and it was for me the most satisfying to read. I was pulled in from the very start! I was so interested in the characters and couldn't wait to find out what would happen next - and then completely unexpectedly, I turned a page, and there was no more. It's a shame Jane Austen never finished this book, and it was but small consolation that it was followed by a brief note regarding what Jane Austen intended would happen to the main characters.

"Sanditon," I'm afraid, got off to a very slow start for me. Jane Austen's stories focus primarily on "the young people," and "Sanditon" just took too long in introducing all the young people. I dare say I got bored while waiting for all the key players to arrive at Sanditon, and just when they did, the writing stopped. There seems to be a lot of social commentary in this piece, and having been written just before Jane Austen died, I wonder if that's why there was so much talk of health in this book.

Overall, certainly an interesting read for the most fervent of Jane Austen fans. But if you're not interested in learning a bit more about Jane Austen's works as a whole, then there isn't as much stand-alone entertainment value in this collection as you would find in her finished novels.

Sunday, June 3, 2012

What To Expect When You're Expecting (2012)

★★½

Another one of those movies that follows several story lines that have the same theme, and the characters' paths cross each other tangentially.

This movie is so completely geared towards people who are or have been pregnant (or the significant others of those people) that if you don't fit that category, I really don't see why you'd bother with this movie. The story lines seem to cover the bases of what you might go through when you're expecting a baby, and one of the character's pregnancies reminded me of my own, so I could really relate. Other than that, though, a lot of the scenes went on for too long, and I expected more funny stuff from the dad's group - the trailer I saw focused almost entirely on the dads.

Again, a movie you could watch as part of a girls night, but only if those girls are moms, or pregnant.

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Mockingjay (The Hunger Games #3) by Suzanne Collins

★★½

*** WARNING!! THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS!!! ***

I really wanted to like this book, but page after page, I found myself lowering my mental rating.

I started out the series wary about the violent premise, but I was pleasantly surprised by how little actual violence there was in The Hunger Games. I wasn't happy with the way that first book skirted the psychological questions of whether or not Katniss was capable of murder (those questions are actually answered in great detail in this book), but I had to admit that the way The Hunger Games unfolded (with Katniss playing defense and all her killings fully justifiable) was more age-appropriate for its target audience.

I think Mockingjay, however, really crossed the line of what is appropriate for middle-schoolers. This book is action-packed, and Katniss goes from war zone to war zone; at each stop, we are treated to a LOT of graphic descriptions of gruesome and macabre deaths that were brought about in horrible, twisted ways. The rebellion basically trains child soldiers, starting at age 14, and Katniss - who is still only 17 years old - is armed to the teeth. Finally, while alcohol was portrayed as an evil throughout the series (you see Haymitch's pathetic life ruined by drink, and the one time Katniss tried it, she didn't like the way it felt), apparently the only harm of the addictive drug morphling is that you might end up a flower-loving hippie.

I didn't like how quickly the rebels labeled Peeta a traitor - wasn't it obvious that he was being tortured and was saying things under duress?!

I did think Coin's questionable leadership of the rebellion made for good reading. District 13 was run almost as much like a dictatorship as Panem, and her sense of humanity was not much better. This uneasiness I felt about her leadership provided for a good bit of suspense, and I liked the way the whole issue was resolved in the end.

It was interesting to see a bit of role reversal with Peeta and Gale. This time, Gale is the sidekick, and Peeta is out of sight. I'm really not a fan of romance creeping into action stories, so I liked that Katniss's dilemma of who to choose was not front and center. As in previous books, she makes a brief mention of it from time to time, but mostly she has bigger fish to fry.

I guess The Hunger Games isn't quite as big as Twilight, because no one talks about Team Gale versus Team Peeta. I have to admit, I could understand how Katniss felt, because I had a hard time choosing who to root for. The juxtaposition of Gale and Katniss's perspectives on what is acceptable behavior during wartime, and Katniss's uncompassionate behavior towards a "hijacked" Peeta, made me think that Peeta would make Katniss a better person, while Katniss would make Gale a better person. Still, Katniss and Gale knew each other better than any two people in the world, so I think I found myself leaning towards Gale, even though I knew I could be happy with either ending, as long as the other person was somehow okay with the final choice, too. Once again, though, the resolution comes with a cop-out: Katniss never actually does any choosing. The series of events forces the choice upon her - it's a happy coincidence that the man she ends up with happens to be the one she realizes was best for her anyway - and frankly, one of the most disappointing parts of the book for me is how Katniss and Gale's relationship is irrevocably severed. That was really hard to swallow, given their past together.

I also really didn't like how depressing Katniss's situation was after the war. She, the Mockingjay, left to wallow in depression with no one to look after her but Greasy Sae and Haymitch?! She was basically abandoned by both her mother and Gale, which I just thought was really not cool.

Sure, the book technically had a happy ending, but even the epilogue left me unsatisfied. What was Gale doing, twenty years on? Did he ever get married? Did he ever think of Katniss, or did Katniss ever think of him? What happened to Panem? My first order of business would be to rename the country and all the districts. How is Annie doing, and where does she live? We know that she was dependent on Finnick for her sanity, so who takes care of her now? What about Johanna? Does she ever put her life together, find love again? Does Haymitch ever get sober? I can't imagine that even after Katniss and Peeta find happiness together, they would just sit by and watch him drink himself to death. And what about all the Capitol citizens? How did they get along with their new reality, and whatever became of Katniss's prep team?

Overall, I had high hopes for this book, but was disappointed in the end.

Friday, April 27, 2012

Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me? (And Other Concerns) by Mindy Kaling


★★★½

For most of the book, I thought I would end up rating it 3 stars for sure. Mindy Kaling is frequently self-congratulatory, and even though you know she's doing it to be funny, sometimes I had to remind myself of that perspective. She mentions several times that teenage girls are something of a target audience for the book - and I do agree, I think I'd like to give this book to Isabelle maybe when she's in high school, though all the pop cultural references will be outdated by then - but for a book that was expected to be in the hand of teenage girls, I wasn't crazy about the use of profanity.

Mindy Kaling is definitely funny, and I was certainly entertained by the book, chuckling at times. The more I got to know her through her writing, the more I liked her. I love the way her relationship with her mom is portrayed, and it is so clear that she respects her parents immensely. Despite her emotional and dramatic tendencies (as she describes herself), she seems to be remarkably down-to-earth with good morals and healthy perspectives on friendships, family, and romances. I like that she is a loyal and devoted friend, which is made especially clear in the chapter titled "Best Friend Rights and Responsibilities". And I think it's great that she shared some her most embarrassing and humiliating experiences - it really makes the reader (perhaps a teenage girl!) feel like it's okay to be embarrassed and humiliated, that it really does happen to everybody, and you'll get over it.

I'm always especially pleased when a book takes place in the Boston area, and since Mindy Kaling grew up around here, it was fun to read about her experiences at places I know. Also, I was SO thrilled to see that photos were interspersed throughout the book. I've always found it kind of annoying when memoirs have photos grouped together in the middle of the book, so I have to constantly flip back and forth between the text and the photos to get the full contextual meaning of the pictures.

I definitely finished the book thinking I might rate it 4 stars, which is why I averaged it out to 3 1/2 stars. She mentions at the end of her book that maybe she'd write another about married life and having kids, once she is married and has kids. If she ever does write that book, I'd definitely read it!

Monday, April 23, 2012

Catching Fire (The Hunger Game #2) by Suzanne Collins

★★★½

*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***

First, the negatives. As the book opened, I really thought the first-person narrative voice of Katniss sounded forced, somehow not as natural as in the first book. The writing improved as the book progressed, but it was a bit of a hurdle to get over.

I never liked the idea of this kind of violence being in young adult novels, and I actually found Catching Fire a lot more violent than The Hunger Games, what with all the descriptions of Katniss's nightmares, the violence of past Games, and the violence of the current Games.

Finally, after Peeta's character was built up a bit in District 12, it was disappointing to see that once the Games began, he was again relegated to being little more than dead weight. It would've been nice to see him be more useful in the arena this time.

Anyway, despite the above, there were plenty of positives to keep me interested in this trilogy. The first thing that struck me in this book was the way it lends itself to potential discussions about revolutions. What makes people want to rebel? What does it take to spark a rebellion? Why would one district be more willing or able to stage an uprising than another?

I thought the mockingjay as a symbol of hope and rebellion - and the idea of Katniss as the mockingjay personified - was great. I really loved the resurrection of District 13, though Ken tells me that kind of thing is a very common plot device in sci-fi fiction. (But I didn't know! So it's new to me.)

In some ways, this book redeemed the trilogy in terms of complaints I had about the first book. The significance of the mockingjay pin is made more clear, and I liked that some of Katniss's inner psychological struggle of having to kill other tributes finally surfaced in these Games.

The ending was unsatisfying, but I think that can be forgiven because it's a trilogy. I'll just have to read the final installment and hope that its ending doesn't disappoint.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)

★★★★

*** Warning!! This review contains spoilers!! ***

Wow, am I really giving this movie 4 stars?! I totally got sucked in way more than I thought I would. Little Caesar was so cute, so human, that I couldn't help but root for him - even though I knew that his rise would mean the fall of the entire human race! 

Caesar's sense of "humanity" was moving - and by "humanity" I mean his kindred connection with his fellow primates, and his respect for human life.

I know it's sci-fi, but I actually got a little worried, wondering how the U.S. National Guard might take down a powerful mob of intelligent primates. I expected the human race to fall at the hands of the primates, so the way it actually unfolded at the very end was an interesting twist. If a super virus really was on the loose - well, okay, I'd have to assume that in real life, Franklin would have been quarantined immediately after having been exposed to the gas, so it wouldn't actually have had a chance to spread. Alright, alright, I know, it's just a movie - I just can't believe how much it sucked me in!

Friday, April 20, 2012

The Hunger Games (2012)

★★★½

A rare case in which I enjoyed the movie more than the book. I wasn't entirely comfortable with the premise of the book, but it does seem to work better as a movie. I don't know, maybe I hold books to a higher standard than movies.

I might even have given this movie 4 stars if they hadn't left out my absolute favorite scene from the book - District 11's gesture towards Katniss, and Katniss's response.

I actually really enjoyed the way the Capitol was over-stylized, and I liked the Gamemasters' control room (which was not at all in the book). I thought the movie improved on the book in a number of ways, including the way the mockingjay pin was incorporated into the story (its significance was questionable in the book), the introduction of the primary Gamemaster character, and the toning down of the book's crazy sci-fi wolves. Also, Katniss and Peeta's relationship just unfolded much more naturally and less frustratingly in the movie than it did in the book. I liked the casting. I didn't like the frequent use of the shaky camera trick.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams

★★★

Yeah, I don't know. I read this book back in middle school, I think, maybe early high school, and I do remember thinking it was funny. I remember my cousin being enthusiastic when I told him I was reading it, and him saying he laughed out loud at parts. I've just re-read it for the first time, and I did chuckle to myself a few times. There were certainly a handful of one-liners that I thought were especially clever, but I wasn't rolling on the floor laughing like I thought I would be. Mostly this book is just plain silly. A light and fun read, though I have to admit, considering how light and fun it is, I'm surprised at how long it took me to finish it.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Rethinking Tikki Tikki Tembo

As a child, did you love Tikki Tikki Tembo by Arlene Mosel? Did you find the absurdly long name "Tikki Tikki Tembo-no Sa Rembo-chari Bari Ruchi-pip Peri Pembo" intoxicatingly fun to chant or sing? First published in 1968, the book has won some honors:

When I overheard my half-Chinese/half-Caucasian 6-year-old daughter singing the name a couple months ago, I had to ask her where she learned it. "In music class, at school," she replied. And to tell you the truth, I felt uneasy.

My first encounter with Tikki Tikki Tembo occurred around middle school. A Chinese-American friend was talking about the way other kids chanted "Tikki Tikki Tembo" around her. I had never heard those words before, so I asked her, "What does that mean?" The quiet seriousness of her response struck me. She looked me in the eye and said, "It's racist."

This is how the story is summarized on Amazon.com:

"In this beautiful edition--complete with line and wash illustrations by artist Blair Lent--Arlene Mosel retells an old Chinese folktale about how the people of China came to give their children short names after traditionally giving their "first and honored" sons grand, long names. Tikki tikki tembo (which means "the most wonderful thing in the whole wide world") and his brother Chang (which means "little or nothing") get into trouble with a well, are saved by the Old Man with the Ladder, and change history while they're at it." (http://www.amazon.com/Tikki-Tembo-Arlene-Mosel/dp/0312367481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1332508100&sr=8-1)

The Multiculturalist, a publication by Northern Illinois University, warns that, contrary to common misconception, not all children's books about other cultures are authentic.(http://www.niu.edu/mct/newsletter/2009-2010/vol3_num1.pdf) On page 4, the article states:

"Teachers who want to share other cultures may unintentionally choose books that are racist or not representative of a particular group... A book that is often recommended (see Huck, Hepler, & Hickman, 1987) is Tikki Tikki Tembo (Mosel, 1968)... The text and illustrations, however, are inaccurate depictions of any Chinese... The message about Chinese names is less than flattering."

I do think the use of the word "unintentional" is important. I hold my daughter's school system in very high regard, and from the beginning, I had to assume that the teachers and administration - not a single person of color among them! - simply did not know about the racist perceptions of this popular tale. I mulled over the idea of calling up the school principal and just letting him know that the story isn't exactly culturally sensitive. But I admit, part of me thought, "Maybe another Asian parent will do it." It wasn't until I found out that the entire school would be acting out the story and performing the song "Tikki Tikki Tembo" at a school meeting that I finally realized, "No one else is going to speak up."

So, in a phone call with the principal, I explained why the story is racist.
  1. The book purports to be an "old Chinese folktale," but it is not. It is actually thought to be based on a Japanese folktale called Jugemu. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jugemu) Presumably, that tale was picked up and retold by Westerners, who mistakenly attributed it to China and added to the story. The result is a story that is neither Japanese nor Chinese, and it exemplifies the racist attitude of, "Chinese, Japanese, what's the difference, they're all the same."

  2. Though the book's illustrations are beautifully drawn by Caldecott Medal-winning artist Blair Lent, they do not authentically depict Chinese people, as noted by The Multiculturalist above. Tikki Tikki Tembo's shoes are actually strikingly similar to traditional Japanese geta footwear, again reinforcing the inaccurate perception that all Asian cultures are the same.

  3. Tikki Tikki Tembo's full name does not include any actual Chinese words, and it perpetuates the stereotype that Chinese words and names sound like nonsensical syllables. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikki_Tikki_Tembo) If anyone doubts that this stereotype continues to persist in modern society, look no further than the 2011 racist rant by a UCLA student.

  4. Tikki Tikki Tembo's little brother does have a Chinese name, Chang, which, according to the book, means "little or nothing." The book was written in 1968, well before pinyin was standardized, but even if we generously consider all tones of "chang" and "zhang," none of the dozens of possible translations even come close to meaning "little" or "nothing."

  5. According to the story, Chinese people traditionally gave their first-born sons long and honorable names. This is not true. I tried to find a source to back up this point, but apparently there isn't really a good way to find evidence of what a culture is not. This Wikipedia article, at least, provides information on Chinese names, modern and historical, and makes no mention of first-born sons ever getting especially long names.

When I read online forums and discussions about the potentially offensive nature of Tikki Tikki Tembo, I am disappointed because so frequently the responses are dismissive. People say, "Oh, lighten up, it's just a fun story for kids." There is, of course, a difference between INTENT and IMPACT. I feel pretty confident in surmising that the author and illustrator of Tikki Tikki Tembo did not set out to offend anyone. In fact, the INTENT may even have been to honor the Chinese culture by sharing a charming story of their understanding of China. But the IMPACT is that an entire culture is misrepresented, and it is not unreasonable that people within the misrepresented culture might feel offended. It's understandable that some people may have happy and fond childhood memories of this book, but their positive experiences with this book does not make other people's negative experiences any less valid.

Another common argument in defense of Tikki Tikki Tembo is, "Children know the difference between truth and fiction. They know this is not a real story of actual Chinese culture." Perhaps some do, but what if the book is actually presented by a teacher or librarian as an authentic Chinese folktale describing Chinese culture? Weston Woods, a production arm of Scholastic, a children's book publisher that specifically creates educational materials for schools, provides a lesson plan for use with their Tikki Tikki Tembo video. Two explicit objectives of the lesson are to "learn about Chinese culture" and "enjoy a well-known Chinese folktale." (http://westonwoods.scholastic.com/products/westonwoods/study_guides/tikki_tikki_tembo.pdf) Of course, in reading this particular book - or watching a video based on the book - the class will do neither.

In 1968, when cultural diversity wasn't yet the major issue it is today, any book that featured a foreign culture was probably welcomed, even if only for its novelty factor. But now that it's 2012, and the children's sections of our libraries are filled with authentic books about other cultures, there is no longer any need to rely on inauthentic tales like Tikki Tikki Tembo as an example of Chinese culture. I am a big fan of Grace Lin, who writes children's books of all levels ranging from picture books to chapter books. Her books are set in America, but they feature a Chinese-American family and plenty of Chinese and Taiwanese culture. For a book set in "old China," I recommend Ruby's Wish by Shirin Yim, a book my daughter actually discovered herself in the school library.

So what did my daughter's school principal say and do in response to my concerns? (My on-the-spot explanations were not quite as organized as my post here, but I think I got the ideas across!) I was so pleased and relieved to hear him say, "I had never thought about the book that way before, but now that you explain it to me, of course I understand." He repeatedly stressed his desire to be culturally sensitive, and he suggested a compromise for the school's upcoming performance of Tikki Tikki Tembo. (I knew the school had been practicing the show for months, and it was too late to do anything drastic like cancel the performance or choose a new story and song.) Rather than introduce it as "a Chinese folktale," they would simply call it "a story" and avoid any references to China or Chinese culture. I thought that was a great idea.

Moving forward, seeing how popular Tikki Tikki Tembo is in schools and with parents, I think it's unrealistic to expect everyone to simply remove it from their bookshelves. My hope is that if people do continue to pass on the story of Tikki Tikki Tembo, they do it in a responsible way.
  • One option is to use the story to bring back oral storytelling, and to leave out all references of China and Chinese culture. Without using the actual book at all, parents and teachers can tell the tale of Tikki Tikki Tembo, simply setting it in "a far away land." The younger brother can have a name that does not strongly evoke any particular foreign culture, and it can be comparable to the syllables in Tikki Tikki Tembo's name. Perhaps something like Bip.

  • Another option is to use the book as a teaching opportunity. Parents and teachers can enjoy the book and its illustrations, but follow it up with a discussion about how not all books are true stories, and not all pictures are true representations of what they are trying to depict. Inaccuracies in the story and pictures can be explicitly pointed out, and the book can be followed by a reading of another book that does authentically portray Chinese culture.

For another person's insights, I recommend this article. It gives what I think is a fair and balanced review of the book, and then it discusses the appropriateness of the book in today's diverse society. It goes even further by suggesting other books about names, and Asian names in particular, that can be used to supplement a reading of Tikki Tikki Tembo.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games #1) by Suzanne Collins

★★★

*** Warning: This review contains spoilers!!! ***

Okay, okay, I have to admit, I went into this book with a bias against it. I already knew the premise, and I just didn't think it was appropriate for middle schoolers to be reading about kids killing kids. (Amazon lists the book as being for ages 12 and up.) Once I started reading, though, I saw right away that the killings weren't actually a real focus of the book, so I lightened up. There are explicit descriptions of killings, but they are brief and infrequent, so I guess I can get over it. But, I still don't like the premise, and I still don't think it's appropriate for middle schoolers. Maybe it's okay for high schoolers. 

I do like the idea of parents reading this book along with their kids and having discussions about the bigger themes. When a society is made up of haves and have-nots, how does that affect the attitudes of the people within those populations? What does it say about the range of humanity that in some districts, being chosen as a tribute is feared, but in others, it's an honor? Though the premise of the book involves killings, how does the book actually turn attention to positive human emotions like compassion and loyalty?

The examples of compassion and loyalty were really my favorite parts of the book. I even teared up when District 11 sent a gesture of thanks for Katniss's kindness towards Rue. I really liked Peeta's devotion to Katniss - even though, once they teamed up, Peeta only seemed to weigh Katniss down.

I liked that the book was easy to read; the literary voice of the teenage girl was convincing. As a reader, I got a pretty good understanding of her confusing emotions regarding Gale and Peeta. But, with Katniss narrating, it seemed like there were only a limited number of possible outcomes, and I wonder if a third-person narration would have been more effective. And, after a while, her dense inability to see Peeta's true feelings got kind of annoying.

One thing that really kept bothering me as the book progressed was that even though the author chose to use this controversial premise of kids killing kids, she actually side-stepped all the difficult issues. Once the Hunger Games actually started, it was one cop-out after another: Katniss kills a boy basically in self-defense, after he kills Rue; Peeta accidentally causes the death of Foxface; both Katniss and Peeta "finish off" a dying competitor, presumably putting them out of their misery more than anything else; Cato kills Thresh so they don't have to. Conveniently, neither Katniss nor Peeta ever had to kill anyone in cold blood. Katniss wasn't even ever in a position to face that question head-on. Not that I would necessarily WANT them to be in that position, but for a book based on the premise of kids killing kids, I think it would have been worth exploring the difficult questions of whether or not Katniss or Peeta could have actually brought themselves to kill someone for the sake of killing, or what the psychological aftermath would have been if they did. 

Another thing that really threw me off was the arrival of the mutts at the lake. Where did that come from?! The book suddenly had a weird horror element. The idea of the fallen tributes being turned into monsters - rather than their bodies being sent home to their families - was truly horrifying. It seemed even to go beyond the level of inhumanity previously attributed to the Capitol. I just didn't see the point of that twist. Why not use killer wolf-like mutts without the human connection? Is the author setting the groundwork for something in one of the sequels?

One more thing - I was a little annoyed that the significance of the mocking-jay pin was never revealed. Why was Madge SO insistent that Katniss wear it into the arena? I can only hope it's revealed in a sequel.

Given that the book ended on a clear cliff-hanger, I will be putting the next book in the series on my to-read list. I admit, I'm dying to find out what happens between Katniss and Gale.

Overall, despite my misgivings about the premise, it was entertaining, and it was easy reading - like eating popcorn, Ken says - but I think it ultimately fell short of its potential.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

The Lord of the Rings Part Three: The Return of the King by J.R.R. Tolkien

★★★★★

I can't believe how much I had forgotten. There are SO many liberties taken in the movies, but I love the movies, too, so I'm not going to complain.

Mostly I just love, love how the book provides closure for every loose end, and I'm always a sucker for happy endings. I get sad thinking about the Grey Havens, but it's a poignant and nostalgic kind of sadness.

The last third of the book was actually made up of the appendices, which I did remember as being worthwhile reading. I admit I barely skimmed Appendices C, D, E, and parts of F, but for the rest, I really enjoyed being filled in on the back story and on what happens to each character in the future just as much as I enjoyed the main story itself.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

The Flowers of War (2011)

★★★★

As beautifully stylized as would be expected from a Zhang Yimou film, but also terribly graphic. Sadly, it was probably not an exaggerated account of Japan's Rape of Nanking.

Christian Bale plays a shameless American mortician who, in order to survive, impersonates a priest. Amid the atrocities of war, he finds his courage and his moral compass.

In times of war, there are heroes, big and small. Not all are well-known or publicly lauded, but that doesn't make their deeds any less honorable or brave.

A few details compel me to give this movie a less-than-5-star rating. Towards the end, Christian Bale's character started to open up about his past, but his back story wasn't fleshed out; it was just enough to make you curious and then leave you hanging. Rather than adding to his character development, it seemed superfluous. Also, at one point, two people managed to leave the cathedral, which seemed incredulous given the armed guards outside. Even the characters in the movie repeatedly asked, "How did they get out?!" but no answer was ever given.

New Year's Eve (2011)

★★½

This movie is just what you'd expect it to be. A couple mildly interesting characters and story lines, at least one disappointing ending, nothing surprising or particularly entertaining, but diverting enough for a girls night out.

Friday, January 13, 2012

The Lord of the Rings Part Two: The Two Towers by J.R.R. Tolkien

★★★★★

Well, it turns out that in The Two Towers, even more so than in The Fellowship of the Ring, liberties were taken when the movie was made. I can't believe I had forgotten so much of the book!

In the book, both the Ents and Theoden King are decisive, unafraid, and eager to take on the challenge of confronting Saruman and Sauron, respectively. For some reason, the movie made them out to need convincing in order to defend themselves. Maybe to build up the characters of Aragorn, Merry, and Pippin, who did most of the convincing. Faramir, also, was portrayed a bit differently. In the book, he is much more thoughtful and wise.

I can't remember the details of how the series ends, but I hope it answers a question that was posed in this book. At one point Galadriel sends Legolas a message and warns him to stay away from the sea. But why?!

Overall I was pleased with how much I enjoyed this book. In the movie, the Frodo and Sam parts were the least interesting - dare I say boring? - and I sort of expected the same for the book. But actually, I think I ended up enjoying Frodo and Sam's story - especially when Gollum or Faramir were involved - just as much as the Merry / Pippin and Aragorn / Legolas / Gimli story lines.